Classic With Very Low Mileage For The Age on 2040-cars
Brooklyn, New York, United States
I BOUGHT THE CAR FOR MY WIFE WHO JUST STARTED DRIVING . SHE DECIDED TO BUY A 4 DOORS CAR INSTEAD BECAUSE SHE DOESN'T LIKE COUPE SO BASICALLY I DIDN'T EVEN GET TO REGISTER THE CAR . I BOUGHT IT FROM MY FRIEND WHO WORKS FOR A DEALER,THEREFORE THE WINNING BIDDER WILL ALSO GET A REASSIGNMENT SUPPLEMENT WITH THE TITLE . THE CAR RUNS GREAT . MECHANICALLY ENGINE AND TRANNY IS GREAT. IT JUST NEEDS 3 THINGS THAT I KNOW OF .1 THE PASSENGER SIDE HEADLIGHT STAYS UP BECAUSE THAT WAS WHERE THE CAR WAS HIT BY A POLE , WHEN I CHANGED THE HEADLIGHT , I SHOULD'VE BOUGHT THE MOTOR FOR IT AS WELL , SO EASY FIX. 2 THE DRIVER INSIDE PANEL IS KINDA TORN A LITTLE WHILE TRYING TO REMOVE THE ORIGINAL SPEAKERS TO PUT AFTER MARKET ONES,3 THE RIGHT FENDER NEEDS PAINTING . CAR IS BEING SOLD AS IS . GREAT FOR A FIRST CAR OR SOMEONE WHO JUST STARTS DRIVING . 4 TIRES WERE PURCHASED A FEW MONTHS AGO BY THE PREVIOUS OWNER .ALTHOUGHT THE HISTORY OF THE CAR SAYS 3 PREVIOUS OWNERS , IT'S MORE LIKE 2 OWNERS . THE CAR WAS PURCHASED FROM THE ORIGINAL OWNER FROM HIS FRIEND THEN EVENTUALLY GAVE THE CAR TO HIS SON . NO RUST SPOTS WHATSOEVR JUST THE ORIGINAL PAINT IS RUNNING ITS COURSE , I WAS GONNA PAINT IT FOR WIFEY BUT SHE CHOSE A 4 DOORD CAR INSTEAD . BID WITH CONFIDENCE , YOU WON'T BE SORRY. FOR ANY QUESTIONS , SEND ME A MESSAGE . |
Honda Prelude for Sale
1998 honda prelude type sh coupe 2-door 2.2l(US $4,500.00)
1989 honda prelude 2.0 si coupe 2-door 2.0l(US $2,400.00)
2000 honda prelude (base) jdm h23a blue top(US $4,800.00)
1989 honda prelude 2.0 si 4ws coupe 2-door 2.0l
2001 honda prelude base coupe 2-door 2.2l
Beautiful 2001 honda prelude video available, with ac & power steering(US $6,500.00)
Auto Services in New York
Xtreme Auto Sales ★★★★★
WaLo Automotive ★★★★★
Volkswagon of Orchard Park ★★★★★
Urban Automotive ★★★★★
Trombley Tire & Auto ★★★★★
Tony`s Boulevard Service Center ★★★★★
Auto blog
Rolls-Royce Cullinan, Mercedes-AMG E 53 and BMW 2 Series | Autoblog Podcast #734
Fri, Jun 17 2022In this episode of the Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore and Senior Editor, Consumer, Jeremy Korzeniewski kick things off with a discussion of the Rolls-Royce Cullinan and the future of the brand. The Mercedes-AMG E-Class is next up, followed by the BMW 2 Series Coupe. Next, Senior West Coast Editor James Riswick reports from the ground at the first drive of the latest Honda HR-V. Our hosts revisit the week's news, including automakers requesting a lift of the EV federal tax credit cap, Chevy giving us a peek at its electric Blazer, and Ford recalling millions of vehicles, including about half of all the Mustang Mach-E EVs it has sold. Finally, our guys dig through the mailbag to help a reader decide whether to purchase a Ford Focus ST or another hot hatch. Send us your questions for the Mailbag and Spend My Money at: Podcast@Autoblog.com. Autoblog Podcast #734 Get The Podcast Apple Podcasts – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes Spotify – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast on Spotify RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown Cars we're driving Rolls-Royce Cullinan Mercedes-AMG E 53 BMW 2 Series Coupe Dispatch from the 2023 Honda HR-V first drive event GM, Ford, Toyota, Stellantis CEOs want EV tax credit cap lifted 2024 Chevy Blazer EV partly revealed, details coming in July Ford recalls Mustang Mach-E, includes stop-sale order Ford recalls 3 million other vehicles Spend my money Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on Apple Podcasts Autoblog is now live on your smart speakers and voice assistants with the audio Autoblog Daily Digest. Say “Hey Google, play the news from Autoblog” or "Alexa, open Autoblog" to get your favorite car website in audio form every day. A narrator will take you through the biggest stories or break down one of our comprehensive test drives. Related video:
Honda accused of not reporting all airbag problems
Fri, 17 Oct 2014The Takata airbag recall that has afflicted a number of automakers may have just taken a very bad turn for Honda, which has already recalled over one million vehicles. Clarence Ditlow and the Center for Auto Safety have accused the Japanese manufacturer of failing to report two "injury-and-death" incidents. To determine just what happened, the company has initiated a third-party audit.
According to Bloomberg, CAS claims Honda failed to report fatalities in 2009 and 2013, a point Honda doesn't seem to contest, indicating that it didn't report so-called "verbal claims."
"It is our understanding that some manufacturers choose to include these types of verbal claims, and that these constitute the majority of the injury-and-death claims that they report to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration," the company told Bloomberg via email. "We believe this practice accounts for the vast majority of the difference between the total number of injury-and-death claims reported by Honda compared to certain other manufacturers."
Carmakers ask Trump to revisit fuel efficiency rules
Mon, Feb 13 2017Car companies operating in the US are required to meet stringent fuel efficiency standards (a fleet average of 54.5MPG) through 2025, but they're hoping to loosen things now that President Trump is in town. Leaders from Fiat Chrysler, Ford, GM, Honda, Hyundai, Nissan, Toyota and VW have sent a letter to Trump asking him to rethink the Obama administration's choice to lock in efficiency guidelines for the next several years. The car makers want to revisit the midterm review for the 2025 commitment in hopes of loosening the demands. They claim that the tougher requirements raise costs, don't match public buying habits and will supposedly put "as many a million" jobs up in the air. The Trump administration hasn't specifically responded to the letter, although Environmental Protection Agency nominee Scott Pruitt had said he would return to the Obama-era decision. The automakers' argument doesn't entirely hold up. While the EPA did estimate that the US would fall short of efficiency goals due to a shift toward SUVs and trucks, the job claims are questionable. Why would making more fuel efficient vehicles necessarily cost jobs instead of pushing companies to do better? As it is, even a successful attempt to loosen guidelines may only have a limited effect. All of the brands mentioned here are pushing for greater mainstream adoption of electric vehicles within the next few years -- they may meet the Obama administration's expectations just by shifting more drivers away from gas power. This article by Jon Fingas originally appeared on Engadget, your guide to this connected life. Related Video: News Source: ReutersImage Credit: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg via Getty Images Government/Legal Green Chrysler Fiat GM Honda Hyundai Nissan Toyota Volkswagen Fuel Efficiency CAFE standards Trump