Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1972 Gmc 2500 Custom 4wd on 2040-cars

Year:1972 Mileage:70588
Location:

Salem, Oregon, United States

Salem, Oregon, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
VIN: TKE242Z502212 Year: 1972
Mileage: 70,588
Make: GMC
Model: Sierra 2500
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"NOT RUNNING"

3/4 ton 4wd with factory air converted over. NON RUNNING MOTOR. Comes with fresh 327 short block with forged steel crankshaft in a 1971 4bolt main block with forged flattop pistons(30 Over). Needs camshaft as the old one took a walk and munched distributor gear. should have used a cam button.... No heads or intake manifold but does include Holley 650. Fresh Master Rebuilt Turbo 350 with Stage2 Shift kit and new 2500 stall converter. Rebuilt 205 transfer case. New Morrosso deep pan. New water pump, Alternator and power steering pump. New Hooker headers and Magnaflow Exhaust. 6 inch lift and BFGs with over 50% tread. Interior is decent with newer carpet and cloth split bucket/bench seats with fold down console in middle.Everything for factory air is included. Rust is limited to the rocker panels, mostly on drivers side. Floor is solid.

Bed has a newer Chrome Step Bumper and spray in bed liner. Front bed panel got bent into cab pretty good, but its all fixable. Couple of small spots on bed side where bondo is cracking.
This was a strong running truck until the cam walked. Its a solid old truck and an excellent candidate for a full restoration.
Any questions call me at 503-551-8021.
Payment must be in cash at time of pickup within 3 weeks of auction close.
Buyer responsible for all shipping.
Needs a 7ft wide trailer.

Auto Services in Oregon

Uncle Al`s Automotive Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 180 E Clarendon St, Aurora
Phone: (503) 457-4210

Tualatin Transmission Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Clutches
Address: 8240 SW Tonka St, Tualatin
Phone: (503) 691-1555

TRS 24Hr Towing, South Salem ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Roadside Service, Marine Towing
Address: 4676 Commercial ST SE, Turner
Phone: (971) 600-2330

Town & Country Glass ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Automobile Accessories
Address: 9427 SE Sun Crest Dr, Tualatin
Phone: (503) 284-5277

Tim`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 15688 SE 135th Ave, Damascus
Phone: (503) 656-0600

The Offroad Shop & Automotive Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 9952 SE Ash St, Oak-Grove
Phone: (503) 702-4996

Auto blog

GMC boss wants a Jeep Wrangler rival

Wed, 12 Nov 2014

Challengers come and challengers go, but the Jeep Wrangler continues to push forward even after vehicles like the Toyota FJ Cruiser and the entire Hummer brand have been shut down. Now GMC reportedly wants to take a stab at the quintessential Jeep, as well.
The news comes directly from Buick-GMC vice president Duncan Aldred, speaking with our compatriots over at Edmunds. Although Aldred said there are no plans currently on the table to expand GMC's lineup beyond the current range, "there is plenty of room everywhere in the hierarchy."
That could include a rival to the Wrangler, as well as a flagship luxury SUV positioned above the current Yukon Denali (pictured above). Just when (or for that matter, if) such models might come into fruition remains a big question mark, but it's certainly interesting to see what GM's dedicated truck brand has on the drawing board.

NHTSA, IIHS, and 20 automakers to make auto braking standard by 2022

Thu, Mar 17 2016

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and virtually every automaker in the US domestic market have announced a pact to make automatic emergency braking standard by 2022. Here's the full rundown of companies involved: BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Jaguar Land Rover, Kia, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Subaru, Tesla, Toyota, Volkswagen, and Volvo (not to mention the brands that fall under each automaker's respective umbrella). Like we reported yesterday, AEB will be as ubiquitous in the future as traction and stability control are today. But the thing to note here is that this is not a governmental mandate. It's truly an agreement between automakers and the government, a fact that NHTSA claims will lead to widespread adoption three years sooner than a formal rule. That fact in itself should prevent up to 28,000 crashes and 12,000 injuries. The agreement will come into effect in two waves. For the majority of vehicles on the road – those with gross vehicle weights below 8,500 pounds – AEB will need to be standard equipment by September 1, 2022. Vehicles between 8,501 and 10,000 pounds will have an extra three years to offer AEB. "It's an exciting time for vehicle safety. By proactively making emergency braking systems standard equipment on their vehicles, these 20 automakers will help prevent thousands of crashes and save lives," said Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx said in an official statement. "It's a win for safety and a win for consumers." Read on for the official press release from NHTSA. Related Video: U.S. DOT and IIHS announce historic commitment of 20 automakers to make automatic emergency braking standard on new vehicles McLEAN, Va. – The U.S. Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety announced today a historic commitment by 20 automakers representing more than 99 percent of the U.S. auto market to make automatic emergency braking a standard feature on virtually all new cars no later than NHTSA's 2022 reporting year, which begins Sept 1, 2022. Automakers making the commitment are Audi, BMW, FCA US LLC, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Jaguar Land Rover, Kia, Maserati, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi Motors, Nissan, Porsche, Subaru, Tesla Motors Inc., Toyota, Volkswagen and Volvo Car USA.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.