Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2004 Gmc Envoy Slt White 4d Suv on 2040-cars

US $4,500.00
Year:2004 Mileage:79511
Location:

Clio, Michigan, United States

Clio, Michigan, United States

 if your interested in financing please contact us at 810-640-7227

Auto Services in Michigan

Welling`s Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Brake Repair
Address: Stanwood
Phone: (989) 967-3642

Waterford Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3783 Elizabeth Lake Rd, Lathrup-Village
Phone: (248) 499-6767

Victor George Chrysler-Jeep ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 5050 S Saginaw Rd, Clayton-Twp
Phone: (810) 744-6537

Twin Village Tire & Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Towing
Address: 1755 Metamora Rd, Oxford
Phone: (248) 628-4025

Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 2716 S Rochester Rd, Bingham-Farms
Phone: (248) 392-2098

Tuffy Auto Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheels-Frame & Axle Servicing-Equipment
Address: G3045 Miller Rd, Otisville
Phone: (810) 239-6643

Auto blog

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

MotorWeek looks back at 1995 Chevy Tahoe, GMC Yukon

Sat, Jun 20 2015

MotorWeek's Retro Review series gives us a nostalgic look back at some of the best sports cars and luxury sedans available in the 1980s and '90s. For its latest clip, the show shifts gears to remember the 1995 Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon. Similar to the success of crossovers today, SUVs were tallying big sales and making big money for automakers in the mid-'90s. The Tahoe and Yukon filled slots in the market as steps down from the larger Suburban. These twins weren't wanting for space, though, with plenty of room to haul around a family. MotorWeek came away generally impressed too, and called the models some "of the better riding sport utilities we've ever experienced." This review comes with some jazzy, electric guitar licks to enjoy in the background.

GM will no longer remove parts from trucks to calculate curb weights

Fri, 08 Aug 2014

Following last week's mild uproar after it was discovered that Ford and General Motors were removing some optional parts from their pickups to lower the curb weight and consequently increase the maximum payload, GM has come out and committed to a base curb weight for its upcoming Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon compact trucks (although it has yet to publish them) and its current Silverado and Sierra. The company will do the same for its heavy duty offerings, although those numbers have not been finalized yet.
"This will make our curb weight and payload specs more consistent with those of most other truck makers, making it easier for customers to compare vehicles," GM spokesman Tom Wilkinson told Autoblog in an emailed statement.
As GM notes - and as every manufacturer has noted since this story broke - customers still shouldn't take max payload ratings as gospel. Instead, they should refer to their truck's Tire and Load Label, like the one shown at the inset, which will offer detailed information on max payload, specific to their truck.