Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2002 Clean Ford Windstar Fior Sale!!!!!! on 2040-cars

Year:2002 Mileage:107000 Color: Green /
 Tan
Location:

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Minivan, Van
Engine:3.8L 232Cu. In. V6 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Private Seller
Vehicle Title:Clear
VIN: 2fmza52402ba20716 Year: 2002
Make: Ford
Model: Windstar
Options: CD Player
Trim: SE Mini Passenger Van 4-Door
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Mileage: 107,000
Exterior Color: Green
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Tan
Drive Type: automatic
Number of Cylinders: 6
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Up for sale is a 2002 ford Windstar...nice, sliding doors...rides smooth...107k on it clean van inside and out...all features work good. Good passenger van for big family ...No mechanical issues at the moment. just get in and drive. The blue book value for this van is 4500-4900 in the shape that it is in..but I am asking lower than market value for buffer purpose and wear and tear problem all cars can have down the road due to it being a used car. So be realistic in bidding to know no used car is perfect. If you do move on...because all used cars will need something. This one will need minimal at this point. I am looking for someone who wants a nice van at a good price. Cash only.......no money orders or checks and pickup only. This van is being sold locally as well so please keep in mind it could be sold before auction ends.. if you want to see van please and I say please see it before auction ends so the sale can commence. Thank u and happy bidding.

Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Wood`s Locksmithing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Locks & Locksmiths, Keys
Address: Columbia-Cross-Roads
Phone: (607) 731-8382

Wiscount & Sons Auto Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: Lebanon
Phone: (717) 647-2629

West Deptford Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 466 Crown Point Rd, Sharon-Hill
Phone: (856) 848-5020

Waterdam Auto Service Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 1041 Waterdam Plaza Dr, New-Eagle
Phone: (724) 941-9110

Wagner`s Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 514 Market St, Forty-Fort
Phone: (570) 288-2689

Used Auto Parts of Southampton ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Parts & Supplies-Used & Rebuilt-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: Wycombe
Phone: (215) 396-9109

Auto blog

Motor Trend pits Subaru WRX vs. Ford Focus ST

Thu, 23 Jan 2014

The Ford Focus ST has enjoyed a relatively calm, if brief, reign in the world of hot hatches. With nothing else in the class (in the States, at least) but the aging Mazdaspeed3 and Subaru Impreza WRX and the slow-selling Volkswagen Golf R, the Blue Oval's 252-horsepower five door has been the go-to vehicle for those that don't need the high-octane lunacy (and expense) of the rally bred Subaru Impreza WRX STI and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X.
Now, though, as the new Subaru WRX (it's not an Impreza anymore, though, neither is it a hatchback...) starts to arrive at dealers, the Focus ST appears to be under threat for the first time. Naturally, Motor Trend is here to figure out which one is the best, with another one of its Head 2 Head videos. Host Jonny Lieberman puts both cars through their paces, going above and beyond, quite literally, at the very end of the video.
Have a look below and let us know what you think of MT's verdict in Comments.

Consumer Reports declares most and least loved cars [w/video]

Wed, Dec 3 2014

Consumer Reports is crunching the numbers from its annual owner-satisfaction survey, and part of that process is finding out how attached drivers are to their cars. CR simply asks readers of models up to three years old if they would buy the same vehicle again in light of their entire ownership experience, and tallies the results. After looking at the responses for about 350,000 vehicles, it turns out that people really love a certain California-built, electrically powered luxury sedan. That's right, this year's the overall winner was the Tesla Model S with a whopping 98 percent of owners saying they would purchase another one (the Model S also won this award last year, with 99 percent satisfaction). The Chevrolet Corvette Stingray came in a close second with 95 percent of drivers hoping to park another one in their garage. A few models weren't quite so favored, though. The Nissan Versa Sedan was the least loved model among its owners; a mere 42 percent said that they would purchase another. The aging Jeep Compass didn't do much better, with just 43 percent of drivers willing to buy the softroader again. On average, about 70 percent of owners say they would buy their car again, and only four cars ranked below 50 percent in CR's findings. Check out the video above to see some of the winners and losers in a few of CR's categories. If you're a subscriber, you can check out the full list on its website. Related Gallery Consumer Reports Most Loved Cars 2014 Related Gallery Consumer Reports Least Loved Cars 2014 News Source: Consumer Reports - sub. req., Consumer Reports via YouTube Chevrolet Ford Mazda Mercedes-Benz Porsche Subaru Tesla Ownership Videos car ownership

Ford Mustang Mach-E fails Sweden's moose test

Wed, Sep 29 2021

The infamous moose test has claimed another casualty. This time it's the Ford Mustang Mach-E AWD Long Range, which was tested in an electric four-way alongside the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Skoda Enyaq iV (an electric utility vehicle closely related to the Volkswagen ID.4 that is sold in the United States). According to the Swedish testers at Teknikens Varld, Ford's electric car not only failed to hit the speed necessary for a passing grade, it didn't perform well at slower speeds, either. To pass the outlet's moose test, a car has to complete a rapid left-right-straight S-shaped pattern marked by cones at a speed of at least 72 km/h (44.7 miles per hour). The test is designed to mimic the type of avoidance maneuver a driver would have to take in order to avoid hitting something that wandered into the road, which in Sweden may be a moose but could just as easily be a deer or some other member of the animal kingdom elsewhere in the world, or possibly a child or car backing into the motorway. Not only is the maneuver very aggressive, it's also performed with weights belted into each seat and more weight added to the cargo area to hit the vehicle's maximum allowable carrying capacity. The Mustang Mach-E only managed to complete the moose test at 68 km/h (42.3 mph), well below the passing-grade threshold. Even at much lower speeds, Teknikens Varld says the Mach-E (which boasts the highest carrying capacity and was therefore loaded with more weight than the rest of the vehicles tested in this quartet) is "too soft in the chassis" and suffers from "too slow steering." Proving that it is indeed possible to pass the test, the Hyundai and Skoda completed the maneuver at the 44.7-mph figure required for a passing grade and the Tesla did it at 46.6 mph, albeit with less weight in the cargo area. It's not clear whether other versions of the Mustang Mach-E would pass the test. It's also unknown if Ford will make any changes to its chassis tuning or electronic stability control software, as some other automakers have done after a poor performance from Teknikens Varld, to improve its performance in the moose test. Related video: