2010 Ford Transit Connect Xlt on 2040-cars
1001 N. Riley Hwy, Shelbyville, Indiana, United States
Engine:2.0L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:4-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): NM0KS9BN5AT013775
Stock Num: H4434
Make: Ford
Model: Transit Connect XLT
Year: 2010
Exterior Color: Silver
Interior Color: Dark Gray
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 51475
Silver Metallic, Best Color for Resale!, Clean AutoCheck - One Owner!, FWD - Hates Gas!, And Manager Special - Just Reduced!. br br Creampuff! This handsome 2010 Ford Transit Connect is not going to disappoint. There you have it, short and sweet! Ford has established itself as a name associated with quality. This Ford Transit Connect will get you where you need to go for many years to come. br br Visit Heritage Automotive Group online at www.heritageshelbyville.com to see more pictures of this vehicle or call us at 877-336-3046 today to schedule your test drive. (Come see us at Heritage Automotive Sales or visit us at www.heritageautomotivesales.com or call 877-336-3046 to schedule your test drive today.)
Ford Transit Connect for Sale
2014 ford transit connect xlt(US $28,990.00)
2012 ford commercial(US $29,040.00)
2013 ford transit connect xl(US $24,145.00)
2014 ford transit connect xlt(US $24,520.00)
2014 ford transit connect xlt(US $25,520.00)
2014 ford transit connect xlt(US $25,520.00)
Auto Services in Indiana
Wolski`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Wheels Auto Sales ★★★★★
Tony Kinser Body Shop ★★★★★
Tilley`s Hilltop ★★★★★
Standard Auto Sales ★★★★★
Schepper`s Tires & Batteries ★★★★★
Auto blog
Consumer Reports explains its disdain for infotainment
Thu, 20 Mar 2014One of the perks of reviewing all manner of cars and trucks is that we're exposed to all the different infotainment systems. Whether Cadillac's CUE, Chrysler's UConnect, BMW's iDrive or MyFord Touch, we sample each and every infotainment system on the market.
Not surprisingly, some are better than others. It seems consumers have come to a similar consensus, with Consumer Reports claiming that Ford and Lincoln, Cadillac and Honda offer the worst user infotainment experiences. Not surprisingly, you won't find much argument among the Autoblog staff.
Take a look below to see just what it is about the latest batch of infotainment systems that grinds CR's gears. After that, scroll down into Comments and let us know if you agree with the mag's views.
2016: The year of the autonomous-car promise
Mon, Jan 2 2017About half of the news we covered this year related in some way to The Great Autonomous Future, or at least it seemed that way. If you listen to automakers, by 2020 everyone will be driving (riding?) around in self-driving cars. But what will they look like, how will we make the transition from driven to driverless, and how will laws and infrastructure adapt? We got very few answers to those questions, and instead were handed big promises, vague timelines, and a dose of misdirection by automakers. There has been a lot of talk, but we still don't know that much about these proposed vehicles, which are at least three years off. That's half a development cycle in this industry. We generally only start to get an idea of what a company will build about two years before it goes on sale. So instead of concrete information about autonomous cars, 2016 has brought us a lot of promises, many in the form of concept cars. They have popped up from just about every automaker accompanied by the CEO's pledge to deliver a Level 4 autonomous, all-electric model (usually a crossover) in a few years. It's very easy to say that a static design study sitting on a stage will be able to drive itself while projecting a movie on the windshield, but it's another thing entirely to make good on that promise. With a few exceptions, 2016 has been stuck in the promising stage. It's a strange thing, really; automakers are famous for responding with "we don't discuss future product" whenever we ask about models or variants known to be in the pipeline, yet when it comes to self-driving electric wondermobiles, companies have been falling all over themselves to let us know that theirs is coming soon, it'll be oh so great, and, hey, that makes them a mobility company now, not just an automaker. A lot of this is posturing and marketing, showing the public, shareholders, and the rest of the industry that "we're making one, too, we swear!" It has set off a domino effect – once a few companies make the guarantee, the rest feel forced to throw out a grandiose yet vague plan for an unknown future. And indeed there are usually scant details to go along with such announcements – an imprecise mileage estimate here, or a far-off, percentage-based goal there. Instead of useful discussion of future product, we get demonstrations of test mules, announcements of big R&D budgets and new test centers they'll fund, those futuristic concept cars, and, yeah, more promises.
Chrysler called out over lackluster Ram Runner by racer who helped develop it
Fri, 11 Apr 2014Fans of off-roading and desert blasting might recall that Chrysler offers an aftermarket conversion that can turn a Ram 1500 into a road-legal desert racer, called the Ram Runner. The kit, sold through Mopar, includes some significant suspension upgrades, body tweaks and a brawnier cat-back exhaust for the truck's 5.7-liter V8.
Considering all of this, comparisons with the almighty Ford F-150 SVT Raptor are common. Among the off-road community, that makes these two a sort of Chevrolet Camaro and Ford Mustang for people that prefer driving on dirt. In the Race-Dezert forum, the discussion as to which truck was better was proceeding as normal - Ram fans said their piece and Ford fans said theirs. Then, a man named Kent Kroeker offered up his two cents.
See, Kroeker is a Baja racer, and the man that helped develop the Ram Runner. Despite his association with the truck, though, he had some less than kind words for Chrysler and the Ram Runner.