Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Numbers Matching 2 Top 312 V8 Continental Pkg- Not Running Solid Frame Project on 2040-cars

Year:1957 Mileage:51051
Location:

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
Advertising:

Numbers Matching 1957 Ford Thunderbird

*Continental Package*


Save this old gal!  312 engine is torn town with all parts present ready to be rebuilt. Needs new paint and some minor body work. Frame is solid. Many new engine parts for the rebuild as well as 4 brand new, still in plastic wrap tires. Listing for a friend so I may not have all the answers but can get them for you. Car will need towed. All the random parts in the one picture were spread out for pictures and are now in the trunk. Has porthole hard top on currently with convertible top inside. Feel free to ask questions. Conversion done to run unleaded fuel. All glass is original.  The car last ran in 1991 and the engine was torn down in 1994.  Electronics have not been tested, but car did run and function properly prior to tear down.  Bumpers are present, though unattached.  Additional pictures will be available upon request.

I'm listing this for an older friend who can no longer work on this.  I'm not mechanically inclined and may not have all the answers but can find them out for you.  Feel free to ask questions and i'll answer the best I can.  This is a local pickup only auction.  Buyer will be responsible for this.  Will not ship.  

Feel free to call or text and I will respond as soon as possible.
570.764.6002


On Sep-17-14 at 23:03:02 PDT, seller added the following information:

Deposit is due within 48 hours of auction close.  Remaining balance is to be paid within 7 days of the auction end, unless other arrangements are made.  Item will be relisted with no refund if communication is lost with seller past 20 days.

Feel free to call or text and I will respond as soon as possible.
If I don't answer, please leave a message.
~Tyler
570.764.6002

Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Young`s Auto Body Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 111 S Bolmar St, Thornton
Phone: (610) 431-2053

West Shore Auto Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 736 State St, Carlisle-Barracks
Phone: (717) 730-7060

Village Auto ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 52 Rocky Grove Ave, Oil-City
Phone: (814) 432-4509

Ulrich Sales & Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers
Address: 4340 Morgantown Rd, Isabella
Phone: (610) 856-7050

Trust Auto Sales ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 1422 Trindle Rd Ste C, Plainfield
Phone: (717) 249-2667

Steve`s Auto Body & Repair ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 115 Valley View Dr, Marwood
Phone: (724) 763-1333

Auto blog

We compare 2021 Ford Bronco and Bronco Sport specifications to their ritzy Land Rover competiton

Tue, Jul 14 2020

The 2021 Bronco and Bronco Sport are the spearheads for Ford's new 4x4 sub-brand, with the former taking the fight directly to the Jeep Wrangler and the latter providing Ford with a more rugged alternative to the Escape. We've already looked at how the new Bronco and Bronco Sport compare to their mainstream competition, but we'd like to see how the Bronco stacks up to another hotly anticipated returning nameplate: the Land Rover Defender.  Not to leave its little sibling in the cold, I decided to browse Land Rover's lineup and see what might be a suitable counterpoint to the Bronco Sport. For better or worse, I found an almost-perfect fit in the Range Rover Evoque. So, how do these new American 4x4s compare to the Old Country's more-expensive alternatives? Let's dig in, starting with the big boys.  As you might expect from the Bronco's robust credentials, it holds its own here against the more-expensive Brit. The Defender's higher price point brings along a good bit of power advantage with both engines, but that's to be expected. The Defender also has that trick adjustable-height suspension that the Bronco lacks, giving it an edge in practicality, and it can also tow quite a bit more.  On the flip side, there are quite a few advantages to going with the Ford, including a greater number of choices in terms of powertrain. The available manual transmission on four-cylinder Broncos is a nice bonus, for instance, as is the option of getting either the base 2.3-liter or the optional 2.7-liter engine with either wheelbase. The Defender is a bit more restrictive in this regard offering only the inline-six on the short-wheelbase model. As an added bonus, the Bronco is a convertible. That may not necessarily be a "plus" for all shoppers, but it's certainly an added bit of versatility (and potential appeal) the Defender lacks. And of course, the Bronco can be had for as little as $30,000, whereas the Land Rover starts at $50,000. Now, on to the less-rugged siblings. The specs here are actually a little tighter in most respects, but the powertrain story is almost identical. The Evoque checks in where the Bronco Sport tops out, and the Range Rover gets an optional high-output variant of the 2.0-liter turbocharged four.

Are we about to see a real SUV revival?

Wed, Mar 23 2016

Now that the marketplace has been oversaturated with cute-utes, crossovers, and CUV coupes, are we about to see a resurgence of real, honest-to-God SUVs? Ummm... maybe. The stars seem to be aligning in that direction, at least that's the sense I'm getting. We know an all-new Jeep Wrangler is only a few auto shows away; and that Jeep is about to introduce a new Grand Cherokee Trailhawk for 2017, in the same rugged spirit of the successful Cherokee and Renegade Trailhawks. Ford has hinted at a neo-Bronco, after showing the concept above in 2014 to wet the mouths of all those Duck Dynasty-types out there. And, and... wait for it... I recently learned that Subaru sent a questionnaire out to some Forester owners asking if they might be interested in an off-road package if it were offered. The items listed were pretty hardcore, serious stuff, such as: integrated tow/recovery hooks, additional ground clearance, more rugged wheels, skid plates, altimeter, front-view off-road camera, improved approach and departure angles, advanced differentials, Inclinometer, full-size spare tire, upgraded off-road suspension components, more aggressive tires, off-road driving mode (engine, transmission, throttle, and steering settings), more rugged styling, low-range gearing, and a more advanced traction management system. Folks that's not my wish list (well, actually it is), but those are words from Subaru, asking if that's what customers would like to see. Need proof? Go to the SubaruForester.org website. It's in a discussion there. So... no promises or guarantees here, and feel free to call me a rumormonger if you like; but the next few years could prove very interesting for those who actually do go off road. If this pans out, remember, you read it here first. Related Video: Image Credit: Ford Ford Jeep Subaru Crossover SUV Off-Road Vehicles open road

GM also sheds parts from its pickups to boost payload ratings

Thu, 31 Jul 2014

The row between Ford and Ram over who boasts the best-in-class tow rating for heavy duty pickups has revealed a number of things. Chief among them is a report that Ford removes items like the spare tire, jack, radio and center console from its vehicles in a bid to lower its base curb weight and therefore keep the truck's gross vehicle weight rating down.
For those that need a refresher, GVWR is the vehicle's curb weight plus its maximum payload. A lower GVWR allows Ford to station its F-450 among the so-called Class III pickups, despite the fact that internally, it has the makings of a more brutish Class IV truck.
Ford explains away these deletions, saying a customer could order their vehicle in such a manner. It has also come to light that Ford is not the only automaker to engage in such practices.