55 T Bird Needs Restoration on 2040-cars
Pinole, California, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:none
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Used
Make: Ford
Mileage: 3,465
Model: Thunderbird
Year: 1955
Warranty: none
Trim: 1955
Drive Type: n/a
Important Note Before Bidding: Seller will not accept bids from Ebay members who have any negative feedback or bid retractions or less than (10) Feedback, these bids will be cancelled! Thank you!
Hello, and welcome to our Ebay Motors No Reserve Price auction for this great California Black Plate 1955 Ford Classic T-Bird! The first year Ford made a T-Bird! She currently has no motor or tranny. (explanation in owners notes below). This awesome restorable classic car has (0) zero cancer, has no bondo, and her frame and body are as straight as an arrow! '55 T-Bird restorables in this shape are hard to find! She is a third owner vehicle and odometer reading is 03465. This classic Bird comes with extra parts, including extra front grill and headlight hoods. If you have any questions at all about this awesome '55 T-Bird don't hesitate to contact us anytime by clicking on the ask seller question link. Please bookmark this auction with Watch This Auction Ebay link, so you don't miss the close of our auction! And be sure to practice your own "Due Diligence" before bidding!
Payment & Shipping Information: A 10 % PayPal Deposit Non Refundable will be due from Winning Bidder within 24 hours of close of auction, and Full Balance of payment will be due within 7 days of auction closing. Balance will be paid by verified wire transfer to vehicle owners bank account from winning bidders bank account.
Buyer is responsible for picking up vehicle or for arranging shipping, we can recommend a shipper to contact, but will not be responsible for vehicle after it is picked up at its location.
Thank You!
MESSAGE FROM OWNER
I got my 55 T-bird about 6 years ago. This car was my Dad car my uncle had stored it for 35+ years. When I got the car the motor was seized and was not the original motor, I pulled the motor and transmission
with the idea of installing a larger mustang motor and trans in it.
There was a few small dents in a fender and quarter panel I had a friend with a body shop and we pulled the dents (did not fill them) I wanted to paint the car the same color as one of my Choppers so I
had the shop sand the complete car getting ready to block and paint.
The relationship fell apart with my friend and so the restoration of the 55 stopped.
In the pics you can see some surface rust but that's all it is, there is no cancerous rust on the car.
I have all the head light pieces not on the car seen in the pics
As far as I know my father was the second owner and he did drive the car on weekends and I was told that the miles are original but both my father and uncle are deceased so I would not be able to reconfirm
that.
|
Ford Thunderbird for Sale
- 2004 ford thunderbird pacific coast roadster convertible 2-door 3.9l(US $21,500.00)
- 1956 ford thunderbird base convertible 2-door 5.1l
- 1956 ford thunderbird tbird t bird(US $21,500.00)
- 2003 ford thunderbird(US $11,000.00)
- 2003 ford thunderbird convertible dark shadow gray california car 55,200 mi(US $11,000.00)
- 2003 ford thunderbird premium hardtop convertible leather heated seats 45k(US $17,320.00)
Auto Services in California
Z & H Autobody And Paint ★★★★★
Yanez RV ★★★★★
Yamaha Golf Cars Of Palm Spring ★★★★★
Wilma`s Collision Repair ★★★★★
Will`s Automotive ★★★★★
Will`s Auto Body Shop ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford not backing down on MPG-based marketing strategy
Thu, Jun 26 2014The Blue Oval may have to back off a bit from the green messaging. Ford has had to lower fuel-economy ratings on a number of 2013 and 2014 model-year vehicles, namely its hybrids. And that may force the US automaker to rethink some of its marketing strategy, Automotive News reports. Ford has spent much of the year pushing its fuel-efficiency improvements, with everything from a Super Bowl ad saying its Fusion Hybrid gets "almost double" the fuel efficiency of an average vehicle (after the recalculation, it's now more like 75 percent better) to claiming the Fiesta is the most fuel-efficient non-hybrid in the US (it's actually the Mitsubishi Mirage) to stating the C-Max Hybrid gets better fuel economy than the Toyota Prius V (it doesn't). Nonetheless, Ford doesn't plan on changing its mpg marketing emphasis anytime soon, the company said in an e-mailed statement to AutoblogGreen. "Providing customers great fuel economy is a key part of our Ford vehicle DNA." "Providing customers great fuel economy is a key part of our Ford vehicle DNA," the company said. "We will continue to highlight our vehicles features and attributes in our advertising and marketing, which includes fuel economy and fuel-saving technologies like EcoBoost and hybrids." Earlier this month, Ford said it would lower the fuel-economy ratings of models such as the C-Max, Fusion and Lincoln MKZ Hybrids as well as most of the Fiesta line because of mistakes in the company's internal testing data. It was the second change for the C-Max Hybrid. The good news for Ford is that its fleetwide fuel economy is up almost 40 percent from a decade ago, compared to an improvement of around 23 percent for Toyota. Still, while sales of Ford hybrids and plug-ins are about even with last year through the first five months of 2014, C-Max Hybrid sales have plunged 49 percent from a year earlier. Earlier this year, Ford admitted that the first fuel economy downgrade had a negative effect on sales and we can find proof in the numbers. Before that the change was announced, in August 2013, Ford was consistently selling over 2,000 – and sometimes over 3,000 – C-Max Hybrids a month. In September, it dropped to 1,424, then to 1,438 in October. It didn't climb back above 2,000 until May 2014. The second mpg adjustment was announced in June.
Preposed class-action lawsuit targets 'defective' MyFord Touch
Tue, 16 Jul 2013A national law firm, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, has filed a proposed class action lawsuit whose presupposition is that MyFord Touch is defective. Specifically, the complaint states that the system - as well as the MyLincoln Touch and MyMercury Touch clones - often freeze, fail to respond to voice or touch commands and have issues connecting to mobile phones.
According to Hagens Berman managing partner Steve Berman, MyFord Touch is a theoretically "brilliant idea" that falls short in actual execution. Said Berman in a press release, "In reality, the system is fundamentally flawed, failing to reliably provide functionality, amounting to an inconvenience at best, and a serious safety issue at worst."
Other MFT issues enumerated within the 41-page filing include problems controlling the window defroster, rear-view camera and navigation system. The suit maintains that Ford is aware of the problem but has yet to submit a workable and acceptable solution to MFT customers. Scroll down if you'd like to read the full press release.
1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express in Generation Gap showdown with 1933 Ford Pickup
Fri, 18 Jul 2014Auto enthusiasts love a good debate, whether it's Mustang versus Camaro or Ferrari against Lamborghini. But how about a battle between two very different vintages of classic pickup trucks? In this case, the fight is between a 1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express and a 1933 Ford Model 46 truck with a flathead V8.
The shootout comes courtesy of the internet series Generation Gap, and its concept is super-simple. One guy prefers classics, and the other likes newer rides. They choose a category, pick two vehicles and put them head to head. In this case, neither is exactly modern, though. The Ford is more than old enough to receive Social Security checks, and the Dodge is hardly a young whippersnapper.
Other than both being pickups, these two models were made to serve very different functions. The Li'l Red Express was basically the progenitor of today's muscle trucks, with a big V8 that made it one of the quickest new models in its day (admittedly, 1979 was a rough time for automotive performance). On the other hand, the '33 Ford was just meant to work, with little pretense for anything else. One of the hosts describes it as "the simplest, most difficult" vehicle he's driven because of the tricky double clutchwork necessary to shift gears. Scroll down to watch the video and try to decide which of these two American classics you would rather have in your garage.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.058 s, 7802 u