Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1986 Ford Thunderbird Base Sedan 2-door 5.0l on 2040-cars

Year:1986 Mileage:7267 Color: with red pinstripe
Location:

Macedonia, Ohio, United States

Macedonia, Ohio, United States
Advertising:

 Offered for auction a 1986 Ford Thunderbird. 

Purchased new in November of 1985 (vehicle still has original build date written in chalk on top of radiator shroud).

Currently: 7267 original miles. 

Features include: 

  • 5.0L V-8 engine with dress up kit and JET computer chip.
  • Power steering, Power brakes
  • Ford AOD transmission
  • Power windows and cruise control. 
  • Goodyear P225/60R15 tires on turbo coupe wheels. 
  • Ford AM/FM stereo radio with cassette player and 4 Pioneer speakers. 
  • Air conditioning converted to R134 several years ago. 
  • Black exterior with red pinstripe, and red vinyl interior with Thunderbird floor mats. 

Included with vehicle:  2 car covers, many NOS trim parts and set of lowering springs that were never used and still in original box.

I have clear, original (yellow copy) Ohio title. 

Everything on vehicle works except right hand mirror which is fixed in place.  

 have set what I feel to be a fair reserve price for this vehicle considering the mileage and condition. 

Vehicle has NO warranties either expressed or implied. 

Payment is to be by either cash or certified check only (in the case of a certified check from an out-of state bank, you will not receive the title until the check clears.)  

Buyer is responsible for any shipping fees. Vehicle is also for sale locally, and I reserve the right to end the auction early if it sells to a local buyer. 

Vehicle is available for inspection by appointment, (usually evenings or weekends) call 330-603-7848 for further information. 

Good luck and thanks for looking.


Auto Services in Ohio

West Side Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Electric Service, Brake Repair
Address: 429 Front St, Millersport
Phone: (740) 653-0772

Wally Armour Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Used Truck Dealers, Credit Repair Service
Address: 1950 W State St, Beloit
Phone: (888) 689-9957

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 5363 Dixie Hwy, Mayfield-Village
Phone: (513) 829-9733

Tucker Bros Auto Wrecking Co ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Salvage, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 760 Hickory Ln, Mansfield
Phone: (855) 877-3557

Tire Discounters Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 795 Sunbury Rd, Magnetic-Springs
Phone: (740) 203-2926

Terry`s Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Truck Service & Repair, Brake Repair
Address: 10620 Main St, Struthers
Phone: (330) 391-7437

Auto blog

Detroit 3 to implement delayed unified towing standards for 2015

Tue, Feb 11 2014

Car buyers have a responsibility to be well-informed consumers. That's not always a very simple task, but some guidelines are self-evident. If you live in a very snowy climate, you generally know a Ford Mustang or Chevrolet Camaro might not be as viable a vehicle choice as an all-wheel drive Explorer or Traverse, for example. If you want a fuel-efficient car, it's generally a good idea to know the difference between a diesel and a hybrid. But what if it's kind of tough to be an informed consumer? What if the information you need is more difficult to come by, or worse, based on different standards for each vehicle? Well, in that case, you might be a truck shopper. For years, customers of light-duty pickups have had to suffer through different ratings of towing capacities for each brand. For 2015 model year trucks, though, that will no longer be a problem. According to Automotive News, General Motors, Ford and Chrysler Group have announced that starting with next year's models, a common standard will be used to measure towing capacity. The Detroit Three will join Toyota, which adopted the Society of Automotive Engineers' so-called SAE J2807 standards way back in 2011. The standard was originally supposed to be in place for MY2013, but concerns that it would lower the overall stated capacity for trucks led Detroit automakers to pass. Ford originally passed, claiming it'd wait until its new F-150 was launched to adopt the new standards, leading GM and Ram to follow suit. Nissan, meanwhile, has said it will adopt the new standards as its vehicles are updated, meaning the company's next-generation Titan should adhere to the same tow ratings as its competitors. While the adoption of SAE J2807 will be helpful for light-duty customers, those interested in bigger trucks will still be left with differing standards. There is no sign of the new tow standards being adopted for the heavy-duty market.

10 of 18 midsize SUVs earn 'good' IIHS side impact safety rating

Wed, May 18 2022

It's not terribly surprising that midsize SUVs earned better safety ratings than small SUVs in the latest side-impact tests performed by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Just how much better they scored, on the other hand, certainly raises an eyebrow. Ten out of 18 midsize SUVs earned the highest rating of 'good' in the stringent new test, altered for vehicles starting with the 2020 model year with a heavier barrier (4,200 pounds) that moves at a higher speed (37 miles per hour) and is fitted with a hard honeycomb frontal structure. By way of contrast, just one out of of 20 small SUVs earned a 'good' score.  SUVs that receiving 'good' scores were the Ford Explorer, Infiniti QX60, Lincoln Aviator, Mazda CX-9, Nissan Pathfinder, Subaru Ascent, Toyota Highlander, Volkswagen Atlas, Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport and Volkswagen ID.4. For EV fans, it's worth noting the ID.4 was the only electric vehicle included in the test. The Buick Enclave and Chevrolet Traverse scraped away with 'acceptable' ratings while the Honda Passport, Honda Pilot, Hyundai Palisade, Jeep Wrangler 4-door, Kia Telluride and Nissan Murano were deemed merely 'marginal' in the tough new test. Only two models — the Mazda CX-9 and Volkswagen ID.4 — earned a "Good" rating in every test category.  Interestingly, the Jeep Wrangler would have scored a 'good' rating if it were equipped with side airbags for the rear seating positions. It would likely be an engineering challenge to equip its removable top and/or doors with airbags, but the lack of that safety feature allowed the head of the rear passenger dummy to hit the vertical support of the top. Otherwise, the Wrangler scored good ratings across the board. The new Ford Bronco, which makes more allowances for side-impact safety, has not yet been tested.  The popular Hyundai Palisade and Kia Telluride SUVs stand out in the test with 'poor' ratings for driver pelvis injuries. The Nissan Murano, a vehicle last redesigned for the 2015 model year, was the only vehicle tested that received a 'poor' rating for its structure and safety cage. Videos of the tests of 12 of these 18 SUVs can be found on the IIHS' YouTube page. Related video: Green Buick Chevrolet Ford Honda Hyundai Infiniti Jeep Kia Mazda Nissan Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Safety Crossover SUV IIHS Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

Ward's calls out Ford's EcoBoost engines for their crummy fuel economy

Thu, Jan 8 2015

With a name like EcoBoost, one might expect Ford's line of turbocharged engines to be somewhat, um, economical. In other words, replacing displacement with a turbocharger is supposed to deliver better fuel economy. Based on the experience time and time again of multiple Autoblog editors, your author included, this is simply not the case. Now, Ward's is calling out the cruddy efficiency numbers of Ford's EcoBoost line of engines. The column dresses down not just the new 2.7-liter V6 of the 2015 F-150, but also the 2.3-liter of the Mustang, the 1.5-liter from the Fusion and the 3.2-liter PowerStroke diesel found in the Transit, while also explaining why just one Ford engine was named to Ward's 10 Best Engines list. In its testing of all four engines, Ward's editors never came even remotely close to matching the 2.7's claimed 26 miles per gallon (for two-wheel-drive models), with the truck's computer indicating between 17.6 and 19 mpg over a 250-odd-mile run. Calculating the fuel economy manually revealed an even more depressing 15.6 miles per gallon. Criticisms with the 2.3-liter four-cylinder focused on its strange soundtrack, although it was business as usual with the 1.5-liter and 3.2 diesel, with Ward's criticizing the fuel economy of both engines. The 1.5, which Ward's claims is sold as a hybrid alternative, failed to get over 30 miles per gallon, while the five-cylinder turbodiesel's figures couldn't stand up against FCA's 3.0-liter EcoDiesel. The entire column really is worth a read, especially if you were disappointed in Ward's decision to only salute Ford's three-cylinder EcoBoost while shunning the rest of the company's new turbocharged mills.