Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1965 Ford Thunderbird on 2040-cars

US $2,400.00
Year:1965 Mileage:104218 Color: Yellow /
 Tan
Location:

Ridgway, Colorado, United States

Ridgway, Colorado, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:390 4bbl
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 5Y93Z139279 Year: 1965
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: Thunderbird
Trim: 2 door hardtop
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Drive Type: automatic
Mileage: 104,218
Exterior Color: Yellow
Number of Doors: 2
Interior Color: Tan
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Here is one awesome running 65 Thunderbird. the interior is in really good condition other than the headliner needs replaced. the body has been redone years ago, unfortunately it looks to be a very poor repair job, and will need to be redone.  I have done very little to this since I have gotten it other than getting it running. it will need to be gone thru in order to drive it reliably. I just put on some good used tires and looked at the brakes, they looked around 50-60%, changed the oil and filter. I did not look at the gas tank, I hooked up a can to the carburetor and got it running good. put in a new ignition and solenoid. The glass is not broke, and it goes thru gears easily. I am just trying to clean up the yard so I am selling this relatively cheap with no reserve so that I do not have to part it out, it would be a shame to part out such an awesome car but the motor alone is worth the asking price.
Please feel free to ask questions. I will do my best to answer quickly, or you can call 970-319-7786
I am willing to work with you on storing until you can get it transported, but deposit will need paid immediately (within 72 hours) after auction is over. and the remainder within 2 weeks (14 calendar days) or when picked up . Whichever comes first.

Auto Services in Colorado

Volvo Specialists Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 36 S Santa Fe Dr, Cherry-Hills-Village
Phone: (303) 722-8658

The 4Wheeler ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 6519 Arapahoe #2, Hygiene
Phone: (303) 835-9200

Spec-Wheels of America ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheels, Automobile Accessories
Address: 5850 E 58th Ave # A, Dupont
Phone: (303) 853-9978

Six Stars Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6989 S Jordan Rd Ste 3L, Centennial
Phone: (720) 870-2611

Simpson Brothers Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Towing
Address: 2510 Weslo Ave, Whitewater
Phone: (970) 986-4938

Santos Muffler Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 1225 Federal Blvd, Columbine-Valley
Phone: (303) 972-3800

Auto blog

Recharge Wrap-up: California breaks ground on high-speed rail, Ford launches global mobility experiments

Wed, Jan 7 2015

California has celebrated the groundbreaking of the country's first high-speed rail system. The ceremony took place in Fresno, in the San Joaquin Valley, situated along the line's initial route through California's Central Valley. The train will travel at speeds of up to 220 miles per hour, delivering passengers from San Francisco to LA in less than three hours when finished by 2029. California eventually plans to extend high-speed rail service north to Sacramento and south to San Diego, with a total of 24 stations. The project is expected to cost a total of $68 billion, but could potentially ease road and air traffic, as well as the pollution that comes with it. See the groundbreaking ceremony in the video below, and read more at Engadget or the California High-Speed Rail Authority website. Elon Musk (barely) commented on the Tesla Model 3 during his Reddit AMA. A commenter asked for any new information on the upcoming electric sedan, to which Musk merely replied, "It won't look like other cars." Unfortunately for Tesla fans, the lone comment was the only reference to the electric automaker Musk leads as CEO. The event was full of some really cool space talk, though. Musk also noted he gets an average of six hours of sleep per night, and that showering is the daily habit that impacts his life the most positively. Read the entire AMA at Reddit. Ford outlined its Smart Mobility Plan at the 2015 Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas. It includes 25 global mobility experiments designed to provide insights into the future of transportation needs around the world. "We see a world where vehicles talk to one another, drivers and vehicles communicate with the city infrastructure to relieve congestion, and people routinely share vehicles or multiple forms of transportation for their daily commute," says Ford President and CEO Mark Fields. The mobility experiments include carsharing programs in Michigan, London, Germany and India, a fast-charging infrastructure experiment, a shuttle service in New York and London and even a cycling focused data program in Palo Alto. Read more at Ford's website. This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings. "Our priority is not in making marketing claims or being in a race for the first autonomous car on the road," Fields said. "Our priority is in making the first Ford autonomous vehicle accessible to the masses and truly enhancing customers' lives.

Nissan Z Proto, next-gen Hyundai Tucson and a hi-po mystery Bronco | Autoblog Podcast #645

Fri, Sep 18 2020

In this week's Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by Senior Editor, Green, John Beltz Snyder and News Editor Joel Stocksdale. In the news this week, Ford has teased some sort of high-performance Bronco, Nissan unveiled the Z Proto, Hyundai revealed the next-gen Tucson and GMC teased the Hummer EV's "Crab Mode." Our editors break that all down for you, and share some insights and opinions before they turn to the cars in their own driveways. This week, they've been spending time with the 2020 Mercedes-AMG G 63, as well as the 2020 BMW Alpina B7. Autoblog Podcast #645 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown Ford's beefed-up Bronco prototype stars in new teaser photo Nissan Z Proto previews the retro, rear-drive, turbo, manual future of the Z All the Nissan Z cars that got us to the Z Proto 2022 Hyundai Tucson debuts with striking styling inside and out GMC Hummer teases crab mode, reveal set for Oct. 20 Cars we're driving: 2020 Mercedes-AMG G 63 2020 BMW Alpina B7 Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on iTunes Related Video:

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.