Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1963 Tbird on 2040-cars

Year:1963 Mileage:5 Color: Rose Beige /
 White
Location:

Salem, Alabama, United States

Salem, Alabama, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:390
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 3Y83Z155036 Year: 1963
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: Thunderbird
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: 2 Door
Options: Leather Seats
Drive Type: RWD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Power Windows, Power Seats
Mileage: 5
Exterior Color: Rose Beige
Interior Color: White
Disability Equipped: No
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

63 T-Bird  I have owned and worked on this vehicle about 3 years now. I have had the front end rebuilt, engine has been rebuilt with less than 100 mile on new engine, in, new exhaust, carb rebuilt, steering box rebuilt, seats re-upholstered.  As you can see, its been painted the original color Rose Beige.  I have completely rebuilt the Bird. The chrome on the inside needs to be replaced and thats about it. I have the right to cancel this auction at any time as I have it for sale locally.  I might take a trade, it all depends. Bid to win.  I wish you well. Clear title in hand. Also in the picture the left rear light is out this has been replaced.

Auto Services in Alabama

Y-Bi-Nu-Karz ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: Section
Phone: (256) 886-6069

Wright Tire And Service ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tires-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Brake Repair
Address: 205 W Fort Williams St, Winterboro
Phone: (256) 245-7778

Weeks Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Tire Recap, Retread & Repair
Address: 1883 Hickman Ave, Elba
Phone: (334) 897-2270

Tuscaloosa Chevrolet ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 6500 Interstate Pkwy, Peterson
Phone: (205) 758-4451

Transtech ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Logistics, Auto Transmission
Address: 84 Cedar Ln #102, Clay
Phone: (205) 403-2933

Townsend Roadside Assistance ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Roadside Service, Locks & Locksmiths
Address: 1061 Chateau Dr, Siluria
Phone: (205) 406-7489

Auto blog

Ford finds flex-fuel engine design plays big role in emissions output

Mon, Jan 6 2014

How bad is ethanol for your engine? There's been a lot of debate on this issue as the US considers upping the biofuel content in the national gasoline supply from 10 percent (E10) to 15 percent (E15). The ethanol industry and some scientists say higher ethanol blends show no "meaningful differences" in new engines while the oil industry says ethanol creates health risks. Researchers working at the Ford Research and Innovation Center decided to take a closer look at how a wide range of gas-ethanol blends - E0, E10, E20, E30, E40, E55 and E80 - affected the emissions coming out of a flex-fuel 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis. To see the full report, printed in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, requires payment, but there is an abstract and Green Car Congress has some more details. The gist is that, "with increasing ethanol content in the fuel, the tailpipe emissions of ethanol, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, methane, and ammonia increased." At least NOx and NMHC emissions decreased. The researchers say that the effects are due to the fuel and "are expected for all FFVs," but that the way that a manufacturer calibrates the engine will affect NOx, THC, and NMOG emissions. It's this last bit that's important, since the researchers found, "Higher ethanol content in gasoline affects several fundamental fuel properties that can impact emissions. ... These changes can have positive or negative effects that can depend on engine design, hardware, and control strategy. In addition to direct emissions impacts, higher ethanol content fuel can also provide more efficient combustion and overall engine operation under part-load conditions and under knock-limited higher-load conditions." So, as we head towards more ethanol in our fuel supply (maybe), manufacturers are going to need to learn how to burn it most efficiently.

Ford starting up 2.0L EcoBoost engine production in Ohio

Fri, 22 Feb 2013

Joe Hinrichs, Ford's President of The Americas (pictured above), announced today that in late 2014, the automaker will be building the 2.0-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder at its Cleveland Engine Plant, a move requiring a $200-million investment and the hiring of 450 new employees. European-built Ford products will continue to source this engine from the Valencia, Spain plant where all of these EcoBoost four-cylinder engines are currently built, and the new Cleveland engines will be used for all North American-made models.
Ford is planning to build its popular EcoBoost engines regionally to maximize production capacity and meet customer demand. Last year, Ford sold 334,364 vehicles with EcoBoost engines in the US alone, and that number is expected to swell to more than 500,000 by the end of this year, with global sales expected to total 1.6 million. By 2015, Ford says that 95 percent of its nameplates will offer an EcoBoost engine.
One such vehicle that could be adding an EcoBoost engine, according to Automotive News, is none other than the 2015 Ford Mustang. The report says that Ford could use either the 2.0-liter EcoBoost or an upcoming 2.3-liter EcoBoost in the sixth-generation pony car.

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.