Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2011 Ford Ranger Sport on 2040-cars

US $24,999.00
Year:2011 Mileage:28075 Color: Black
Location:

1630 North Shadeland Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

1630 North Shadeland Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:4.0L V6 12V MPFI SOHC
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTLR4FEXBPA18089
Stock Num: K3071
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger Sport
Year: 2011
Exterior Color: Black
Options:
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • AM/FM/Satellite Radio
  • Automatic locking hubs
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Cloth seat upholstery
  • Cupholders: Front
  • Curb weight: 3,606 lbs.
  • Digital Audio Input
  • Door pockets: Driver and passenger
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Engine immobilizer
  • Fold-up cushion rear seats
  • Front fog/driving lights
  • Front Head Room: 39.2"
  • Front Hip Room: 52.7"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 42.4"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 54.5"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 19.5 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 15 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 19 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Gross vehicle weight: 5,150 lbs.
  • In-Dash single CD player
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Manual front air conditioning
  • Manufacturer's 0-60mph acceleration time (seconds): 7.7 s
  • MP3 player
  • Overall height: 67.7"
  • Overall Length: 203.6"
  • Overall Width: 71.3"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power steering
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Rear Head Room: 33.2"
  • Rear Hip Room: 18.7"
  • Rear jump seat
  • Rear Leg Room: 39.1"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 14.1"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote power door locks
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Short and long arm front suspension
  • Side airbag
  • Silver aluminum rims
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Stability control with anti-roll control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Tires: Pr
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Torsion bar front spring
  • Total Number of Speakers: 4
  • Trailer hitch
  • Two 12V DC power outlets
  • Type of tires: AT
  • Urethane shift knob trim
  • Urethane steering wheel trim
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV II
  • Wheel Width: 7
  • Wheelbase: 125.9"
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 28075

Auto Services in Indiana

Williams Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Electrical Equipment
Address: 127 S Detroit Ave, Portland
Phone: (866) 943-9403

Williams Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Electrical Equipment
Address: 127 S Detroit Ave, Saratoga
Phone: (866) 943-9403

Webb Hyundai ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 9236 Indianapolis Blvd, Highland
Phone: (219) 923-2277

Trusty & Sons Tire Co ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 1074 Old Forest Rd NW, Corydon
Phone: (812) 738-4212

Tom Roush Lincoln Mazda ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 525 David Brown Dr, Westfield
Phone: (866) 869-7884

Tire Barn Warehouse ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 9821 Lima Rd, Fort-Wayne
Phone: (260) 490-8473

Auto blog

Cars with the worst resale value in 2022

Thu, Nov 10 2022

Car values are all over the map right now. Used vehicles that were worth a small fortune earlier this year are now coming back to Earth, but the new vehicle supply remains tight. Prices are still elevated overall, but some models have seen more severe price drops. Depreciation strikes almost every model, supply constraint or not, though a few vehicles are leading the way. New research from analytics iSeeCars found that a handful of cars depreciated more than 50 percent over five years, with the BMW 7 Series dropping 56.9 percent and an average price cut of $61,923 over that time. The vehicles with the highest depreciation — or worst resale value — over five years: BMW 7 Series: -56.9% Maserati Ghibli: -56.3% Jaguar XF: -54% Infiniti QX80: -52.6% Cadillac Escalade ESV: 52.3% Mercedes-Benz S-Class: 51.9% Lincoln Navigator: -51.9% Audi A6: -51.5% Volvo S90: -51.4% Ford Expedition: -50.7% iSeeCarsÂ’ research showed that midsize trucks, sports cars, and fuel-efficient vehicles were slowest to depreciate over five years, while itÂ’s clear that luxury brands tend to lose value much faster. As iSeeCarsÂ’ Executive Analyst Karl Brauer explained, used buyers donÂ’t value high-end vehiclesÂ’ features as much as the first owners, so resale values tend to be softer. The tech and options that made the cars so expensive and appealing new donÂ’t add the same value on the used market. Read more: Cars with the best resale value Interestingly, electric vehicles also depreciated quite heavily, though they were just short of the abysmal numbers in luxury segments. The Nissan Leaf depreciated most among EVs, dropping by 49.1 percent. The average EV depreciation is 44.2 percent, with the Tesla Model S and Model X sliding in right under the bar at 43.7 and 38.8 percent, respectively. As iSeeCars notes, itÂ’s important to be vigilant when car shopping and not let your emotions win over reason. Shiny new luxury cars look great in the showroom, but you could end up taking a bath when you try selling them a few years later on. Related video: Audi BMW Cadillac Ford Infiniti Jaguar Lincoln Maserati Mercedes-Benz Volvo Car Buying Used Car Buying Ownership Resale Value depreciation

Ford Focus was best-selling nameplate in 2012

Tue, 09 Apr 2013

Last August, Ford made a few waves by claiming that the Ford Focus was, at that point, the top-selling car in the world. The automaker failed to account for variations of the Toyota Corolla wearing a different name (such as the Auris and Matrix), however. With official data from Polk coming in now, Ford is able to say that the Focus was, in fact, the best-selling nameplate in the world last year.
Using new-car registrations (which doesn't factor in fleet sales), the Polk data shows that a total of more than one million Focus models around the world. Strong sales in the US and China have led to a 16 percent increase in year-over-year Focus sales from 2011 that helped to create even more of a gap between it and the second-best global seller, the Corolla.
Ford also had the Fiesta and F-Series listed in the top 10 for worldwide nameplates, but what's even more impressive is the fact that the F-Series is only sold in North America. Scroll down to see the list (compiled by Ford using Polk data) of the top global sellers last year and a press release from Ford.

We compare 2021 Ford Bronco and Bronco Sport specifications to their ritzy Land Rover competiton

Tue, Jul 14 2020

The 2021 Bronco and Bronco Sport are the spearheads for Ford's new 4x4 sub-brand, with the former taking the fight directly to the Jeep Wrangler and the latter providing Ford with a more rugged alternative to the Escape. We've already looked at how the new Bronco and Bronco Sport compare to their mainstream competition, but we'd like to see how the Bronco stacks up to another hotly anticipated returning nameplate: the Land Rover Defender.  Not to leave its little sibling in the cold, I decided to browse Land Rover's lineup and see what might be a suitable counterpoint to the Bronco Sport. For better or worse, I found an almost-perfect fit in the Range Rover Evoque. So, how do these new American 4x4s compare to the Old Country's more-expensive alternatives? Let's dig in, starting with the big boys.  As you might expect from the Bronco's robust credentials, it holds its own here against the more-expensive Brit. The Defender's higher price point brings along a good bit of power advantage with both engines, but that's to be expected. The Defender also has that trick adjustable-height suspension that the Bronco lacks, giving it an edge in practicality, and it can also tow quite a bit more.  On the flip side, there are quite a few advantages to going with the Ford, including a greater number of choices in terms of powertrain. The available manual transmission on four-cylinder Broncos is a nice bonus, for instance, as is the option of getting either the base 2.3-liter or the optional 2.7-liter engine with either wheelbase. The Defender is a bit more restrictive in this regard offering only the inline-six on the short-wheelbase model. As an added bonus, the Bronco is a convertible. That may not necessarily be a "plus" for all shoppers, but it's certainly an added bit of versatility (and potential appeal) the Defender lacks. And of course, the Bronco can be had for as little as $30,000, whereas the Land Rover starts at $50,000. Now, on to the less-rugged siblings. The specs here are actually a little tighter in most respects, but the powertrain story is almost identical. The Evoque checks in where the Bronco Sport tops out, and the Range Rover gets an optional high-output variant of the 2.0-liter turbocharged four.