Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2003 Ford Ranger Xl. No Reserve on 2040-cars

Year:2003 Mileage:143512
Location:

Reynoldsburg, Ohio, United States

Reynoldsburg, Ohio, United States
Advertising:

You are bidding on this 2003 Ford Ranger. This truck is the perfect truck for someone who needs a light weight work truck because you will get a truck that will get you to where you need to go with little money. I bought this truck for my brother who is starting his own flooring/painting company. He hasn't really done much with the painting (That was the purpose of this light weight good on gas Ranger). In all honesty, he is not even requiring any heavy duty vans that can carry much heavier cargo (carpet). This truck has 143,500 miles, but it is still a ford truck. it starts right up. There is a hard shift in the first gear sometimes the second gear. I have sent this truck to get inspected, and the result show transmission is slipping. There is nothing my mechanic knew to work on transmissions, so I am selling the truck as is. it does drives straight, has lots of power, no noises or shakes. just simply doesn't shift properly. it isn't scary. I assume because the miles are high and the truck is in the cosmetic shape of a work truck, I will let the winning bidder deal with it. Again, this truck is drivable and you will not hurt the transmission or engine or anything like that. Cosmetically, it is a truck that is 11 years old and shows its wear and tear. it is not in bad shape at all. it is actually in good shape. The A/C is ice cold and all the knobs switches etc etc for the radio and such are in perfect working order Please bid confidently. I have 100% feedback and try to really give a descriptive detail of what the truck is rather than just list each and every little scrape. Please look carefully at the pictures and know that I will gladly respond to any questions. I can send specific pics if you want as well. Please don't hesitate to email me.

Auto Services in Ohio

Yocham Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 425 High St, North-Robinson
Phone: (419) 683-8123

Williams Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Electrical Equipment
Address: 127 S Detroit Ave, Fort-Recovery
Phone: (866) 943-9403

West Chester Autobody ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Windshield Repair
Address: 9366 Cincinnati Columbus Rd, Mason
Phone: (513) 268-0219

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 6449 Glenway Ave, Harrison
Phone: (513) 574-1024

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 24866 Lorain Rd, Lakewood
Phone: (440) 777-3636

Sweeting Auto & Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 301 S Main St, Tremont-City
Phone: (937) 652-1386

Auto blog

Your official Ford Transit specs are here, $29,565* to start

Wed, 04 Jun 2014

Ford has released the full list of pricing and specs on its new Transit, the replacement for the long-lived E-Series cargo van. Prices are set to start at $29,565 and can increase rapidly from there, depending on length, engine and wheelbase, among other options.
Let's talk first about those new engines. The base is the familiar 3.7-liter, naturally aspirated V6. It boasts 275 horsepower and 260 pound-feet of torque and can return up to 14 miles per gallon in the city and 19 mpg on the highway. This engine can also be adapted to run on LPG or compressed natural gas. Of course, there are better alternatives, for a price, the first of which is Ford's well-received, 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6. It packs 310 hp and a best-in-class 400 lb-ft of torque (available at just 2,500 rpm) while matching the naturally aspirated engine in both city and highway fuel economy.
Then, there's the diesel. With a 3.2-liter, five-cylinder diesel mill at its disposal, the Transit generates 350 lb-ft between 1,500 and 2,500 rpm, along with 185 hp. This engine hasn't been rated by the EPA, although we'd be really, really surprised if it didn't handily best either of the gas-powered engines in fuel efficiency. A six-speed automatic is standard, regardless of engine.

Ram 1500 bests new F-150 in MT pickup shootout

Tue, Nov 25 2014

Ford's 2015 Ford F-150 is a technological tour-de-force, what with its aluminum-intensive construction and its powerful and efficient new 2.7-liter EcoBoost engine option. But now that it's hit the market, it's time to get down to brass tacks and find out how just the latest F-150 actually stands up to its rivals in the hyper-competitive fullsize segment. Motor Trend is among the first to round up the Ford (in Lariat 2.7-liter 4X4 guise here) and put it up against the Ram 1500 Outdoorsman EcoDiesel 4x4 and 5.3-liter-equipped Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71 to find out how Dearborn's new-think truck measures up. The test put the trio through over 1,000 miles of tough driving in California and Arizona in a variety of conditions from just cruising around unladen to hauling a trailer. MT found all three trucks to be competent, but the most praise got heaped on the Ram and the Ford, with the Chevrolet falling a step behind its competitors in many tests. Among the Ford's most-liked features was its 2.7-liter, twin-turbo V6 that helped make the F-150 easily the quickest of the group, with some editors saying the engine felt about the same whether driving around with cargo in the bed or not. There was some minor turbo lag during acceleration while trailering, but that issue affected the Ram, too. The Ram's powertrain was lauded, as well. The EcoDiesel was torquey around town, and the 1500's combination of an eight-speed automatic and air suspension was judged to be the best of the lot. It was the most difficult to get into the bed, though. The Ram also won the fuel economy award by netting 20-miles-per-gallon city and 28-mpg highway in the test to beat its Environmental Protection Agency ratings of 19/27. The Ford's EcoBoost managed 17/22, one mpg off each from the EPA numbers, and using a lot of throttle really depleted its efficiency. As MT notes, however, it would take time for the diesel's mileage savings to pay off at the pump for these two trucks. In the end, the Ram just barely eked out the win, with the title partially earned because of "the Ford's unknown maintenance and aluminum repair costs," according to MT. Go check out the full comparison to read all of the details, then let us know what you think in Comments.

Motorweek goes retro with '80s hot hatch shootout

Mon, 03 Nov 2014

Motorweek's decades of history on television make it the perfect medium to look back into the automotive past and see how things are different now. It recently added old road test videos to its YouTube channel of the Acura NSX and Toyota Supra, as well as the Ferrari F40. For one of its newest flashback clips, Motorweek has exhumed an affordable five-car challenge of 1986's premiere hot hatches.
By today's standards, this is an eclectic field that features fondly remembered classics like the Volkswagen GTI 16-valve and Acura Integra. However, it also throws in some nearly forgotten contenders like the Dodge Colt Turbo and Ford Escort GT. The angular Toyota Corolla FX16 GT-S rounds out the group.
It's fascinating to watch Motorweek run the quintet through the slalom, down the drag strip and on various roads. What's most striking in this clip is the difference in the definition of a performance car between then and now. With its 16-valve, 1.8-liter four-cylinder, the GTI is the burliest of the contenders with 123 horsepower, but it still takes 8.8 seconds to reach 60 miles per hour. By today's standards, that would make it a plain-jane economy car, and not even a particularly quick one.