2002 Ford Ranger Xl-super Cab- 4.0 Liter V6-4x4-82,500 Miles- Extras-very Clean on 2040-cars
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:4.0L 245Cu. In. V6 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): EXTRA CAB
Trim: XLT Extended Cab Pickup 4-Door
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Drive Type: 4WD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 82,500
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control
Sub Model: XLT SUPER CAB
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 6
FOR SALE IS A 2002 FORD RANGER XLT SUPER CAB FOUR WHEEL DRIVE IN VERY GOOD CONDITION.THIS IS A VERY RARE MODEL AND SOUGHT AFTER(ACCORDING TO MY MECHANIC WHO SPECIALIZES IN FORD TRUCKS) WITH THE BIG V6 4.0 LITER ENGINE IT HAS PLENTY OF TOWING POWER(IT HAS THE TOWING PACKAGE WITH THE HITCH).THIS TRUCK HAS NOT BEEN ABUSED OR DRIVEN OFF ROAD(EVEN THOUGH IT IS A 4X4).IT COMES WITH A WATER TIGHT FIBERGLASS BED COVER AND A BED LINER.IT HAS 82,500 ORIGINAL MILES(WHICH IS UNDER WAY UNDER THE 15,000 A YEAR AVERAGE) AND HAS JUST BEEN SERVICED AND NEW FRONT BRAKES AND ROTORS INSTALLED.I RUN IT WITH ONLY MOBIL 1 FULL SYNTHETIC OIL.IT HAS FOUR DOORS WITH THE FOLD UP SEATS IN THE BACK AND A BACK SLIDING WINDOW.AIR CONDITION BLOWS COLD CRUISE CONTROL WORKS.I JUST HAD NEW MICHELIN LXT M/S2 TIRES INSTALLED( WHICH ARE GREAT TIRES AND COST OVER $1,000)AND THEY ARE MOUNTED ON THE FACTORY ALUMINIUM RIMS.THE TRUCK HAS NEVER BEEN WRECKED(THERE ARE SOME MINOR DINGS AND A LITTLE DENT BY THE PASSENGER'S DOOR).I HAVE A CLEAN NEVADA TITLE IN HAND.I AM THE SECOND OWNER.I BOUGHT IT FROM MY FRIEND AND HE BOUGHT IT NEW TO TOW HIS BASS BOAT.AFTER HE SOLD THE BOAT HE WANTED TO GET ANOTHER VEHICLE AND I WANTED A TRUCK FOR A SECOND VEHICLE. WHEN I DRIVE IT IT FEELS LIKE A BIG TRUCK SO SOLID.THE ONLY REASON I AM SELLING IT NOW IS TO PAY FOR MY DAUGHTER'S COLLEGE TUITION THAT IS COSTING WAY MORE THAN I PLANNED.THE TRUCK SPENT ALL OF IT'S LIFE IN LAS VEGAS WHICH MEANS THERE IS NO RUST.PLEASE NO LOW BALL OFFERS AND NO TIRE KICKERS I DO NOT HAVE TIME TO WASTE AS I AM VERY BUSY PERSON.I AM VERY HONEST PERSON AND REALLY DO NOT WANT TO PART WITH MY TRUCK BUT MY DAUGHTERS EDUCATION COMES FIRST.IT IS MY SECOND VEHICLE AND NOT MY DAILY DRIVER THAT IS WHY IT HAS LOW MILES FOR A 11 YEAR OLD TRUCK.
Ford Ranger for Sale
- One of four in the world hydraulic hybrid vehicles(US $200,000.00)
- 2011 ford ranger xlt reg cab(US $14,500.00)
- 2000 ford ranger xlt extended cab pickup 4-door 4.0l
- 2004 ford ranger edge(US $8,000.00)
- 1997 ford ranger 4.0l 5spd xtra cab(US $3,500.00)
- 1998 ford ranger ext cab (cooper lanie 765-413-4384)
Auto Services in Nevada
Ultimate Auto Cars ★★★★★
Team Acme Inc. ★★★★★
Tahoe City Chevron Center ★★★★★
Sunshine Service Brake & Allignment ★★★★★
Sunshine Service Brake & Allignment ★★★★★
Stephen`s Buggy Repair ★★★★★
Auto blog
Weekly Recap: Ford GT inspires guitar, foosball table, sailboat
Sat, Apr 18 2015Ford design vice president Moray Callum had just wrapped up a briefing on the interior of the Ford GT last month, but something seemed out of place. He grinned and pointed behind him, "You might be wondering why I have a boat behind me," he said mischievously. It was there because Ford set its designers on a mission to stretch and showcase their talents: design non-automotive objects inspired by the interior of the GT supercar. Callum received quite a response, too. His team produced a guitar, a foosball table (yeah bro!), a racing sailboat, a Wi-Fi speaker and some furniture. As the veteran design chief explained, "It's a really great exercise both to highlight our designers' talents, but also to really see how our design philosophy can work and how you can use it and get a common response back from a worldwide design team." Guitar View 25 Photos The objects have been on display this week at the Salone del Mobile furniture and fashion design fair in Milan, Italy, where Ford has had a presence for three years. There's also a light exhibition that apparently was inspired by the GT, as well. While this might seem a little far-fetched for the automaker, Ford said exhibitions like the Salone del Mobile give its designers another way to be creative and ultimately produce striking interior style. Ford wants this to be a differentiator, as research shows consumers are placing emphasis on the layout and features inside when they're making a decision about buying a new car. It's a little light hearted – but it's also potentially big business. Other News & Notes Cadillac CT6 platform could be used for Buick General Motors product chief Mark Reuss said the Cadillac CT6 platform could be used for a large Buick, though "not yet," Automotive News reported. The underpinnings can accommodate rear-wheel or all-wheel drive and would give Buick the large flagship it lacks. The report jibes with comments Reuss made at a roundtable with Autoblog and other reporters at the New York Auto Show. When asked if Buick had space for a large car on the CT6 chassis, he replied, "Yeah, I think it does. Yeah, I think we do." Buick has revamped its lineup in recent years with attractive crossovers and small and midsize sedans, but hasn't added the proverbial flagship that's yearned for by enthusiasts. Buick surprised industry observers with the stylish Avenir concept at the Detroit Auto Show earlier this year that raised the possibility of a halo sedan.
After Years Of Delays, Rear Visibility Requirements Move Closer To Reality
Fri, Jan 3 2014Regulations that would require automakers to improve rear-view visibility on all new cars and light trucks are nearing completion after six years of delays. The U.S. Department of Transportation sent its proposed rear-visibility rules to the Obama administration for review on Christmas Day. The White House Office of Management and Budget now must finalize the regulations. The rule are intended to minimize the risk of pedestrian deaths from vehicles in reverse, a type of accident that disproportionately affects children. Already in 2014, two children have died from cars backing over them, driven in each case by the children's father. Specifics of the Transportation Department's proposal are not available during the review, but the rules are expected to compel automakers to install rear-view cameras as mandatory equipment on all new vehicles. That's what safety advocates have wanted all along. Thought they were pleased the proposed ruling had finally been issued, there was some worry Friday the final rules would omit the rear-view camera mandate. "We're encouraged, but we're also a little concerned about speculation the rear-view camera may not be in there," said Janette Fennell, the president and founder of Kids and Cars, a nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting children in and around vehicles. "I'm wondering where that might be coming from." On Thursday, The Automotive News had reported the possibility the new standards could offer an alternative to rear-view cameras, such as redesigned mirrors, that improved visibility. The Office of Management and Budget typically completes its reviews of new rules in 90 days, although that can be extended. OMB officials said Friday they do not comment on pending rules. The intent of the rules is to enhance rear visibility for drivers and prevent pedestrian deaths. Approximately 200 pedestrians are backed over in the United States each year, according to estimates from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Accidents Mostly Affect Children Roughly half the victims are children younger than age five. A government analysis concluded approximately half the victims -– 95 to 112 -– could be saved with new regulations. Yet the rules have arrived at a glacial pace. President George W. Bush signed legislation that had been passed with bipartisan Congressional support in 2008. But automakers have fought the idea of adding rear-view cameras, saying it is too expensive.
Trump did talk to Bill Ford, but the Kentucky plant was never moving to Mexico
Fri, Nov 18 2016President-elect Donald J. Trump has been butting heads with Ford for a while now. A lot of it seems to stem from misunderstanding or misrepresenting facts about how the automaker currently does business and its plans for the future. After a sit-down with executive chairman Bill Ford Jr., the misunderstandings continue, but Trump has apparently convinced the company to make some changes. During his campaign, Trump claimed that Ford was going to fire US workers and move manufacturing to Mexico. That wasn't the case – yes, Ford planned to transfer Focus and C-Max production from Wayne, Michigan, to Cuautitlan, Mexico, but no, that wouldn't mean anyone losing their job. The Wayne plant will continue to operate, and likely busier than before, as it will be the home of the new Bronco and Ranger. So Ford CEO Mark Fields responded with the facts, and then chairman Bill Ford Jr. sat down with Trump over the summer. Things apparently weren't resolved to Trump's satisfaction, so he and Bill Ford spoke on the phone yesterday as he claims in this tweet: This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings. Let's pick that apart. First off, it's not a Lincoln plant, per se – the Louisville Assembly Plant currently builds the Ford Escape and Lincoln MKC, two small crossovers that share a platform. Ford was considering moving MKC production out of Kentucky to Mexico, but it would not have resulted in many lost jobs if any – the union had already agreed to moving the MKC in 2015 negotiations, and taking production of the slow-selling Lincoln out of the plant would open up capacity for more Fords. Be that as it may, Ford has decided not to move MKC production out of the plant, either for political reasons of placation or because it didn't make the greatest deal of business sense, maybe a combination of the two. That means Trump isn't really saving any American jobs in the short term. If anything, this move could keep Ford supply-constrained and result in reduced sales, which in turn brings the company less money and affects the bottom line and all employees. But that's speculation, so we won't tweet it. There is of course the possibility that Ford will be convinced, either by sheer will or by a more attractive trade situation, to invest in increased US production, which could bear fruit later on. We are told by Ford that the two men did in fact speak yesterday.