1983 Ford Ranger Pro Street on 2040-cars
Villa Grove, Illinois, United States
Body Type:Standard Cab Pickup
Engine:2.0L 1989CC 122Cu. In. l4 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Interior Color: Blue
Make: Ford
Number of Cylinders: 4
Model: Ranger
Trim: Base Standard Cab Pickup 2-Door
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 1
Exterior Color: Gray
1983 Ford Ranger 351 W C6 automatic 2500 stall converter narrowed 9in w/ 355 posi, holley fuel pump, fuel cell. acaenter line wheels. New 15in front tires, rear tires have lots of tread but have some weather cracks. Engine has new oil pump and seals tranny has new front and rear seals and filter.Truck runs and drives all lights work truck is in primer. Many other projects going. Done as much as i want to on this one. All the hard work is done. Call with any questions 1-217-621-4821 Randy
Ford Ranger for Sale
- 2000 ford ranger xlt, v6, extended cab
- 1988 ford ranger pickup extended cab in great shape runs nice project truck
- 2000 ford ranger xl extended cab pickup 4-door 3.0l(US $4,000.00)
- Ranger diesel, rare, factory diesel truck, turbo, 4x4, 5 speed manual
- 1986 ford ranger diesel pickup 2-door 2.3l rare(US $5,000.00)
- 1 owner 4.0 v6 auto utility campershell ladder rack service cable installation(US $6,990.00)
Auto Services in Illinois
Zeigler Fiat ★★★★★
Wagner`s Auto Svc ★★★★★
US AUTO PARTS ★★★★★
Triple D Automotive INC ★★★★★
Terry`s Ford of Peotone ★★★★★
Rx Auto Care ★★★★★
Auto blog
Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with
Mon, 12 May 2014Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.
Top torque-to-weight ratios under $100k, $50k and $25k
Tue, 07 Oct 2014Horsepower may steal a lot of headlines, but the always-more-complex torque figure is often a critical one for both the workingman and the motoring playboy. The measure of rotational force represents the twist that can liquefy one's tires or haul one's horse trailer. Good stuff.
It follows then, that as with the horsepower-to-weight list that we assembled for you a few months ago, a list of cars that offer the most pound-feet with the fewest pounds to carry, is an interesting one to break down. Sure, there's a big difference in how the torque is applied from a turbocharged six-cylinder in a Swedish luxury sedan and a massive heavy-duty truck's turbo-diesel. But being the car/stat geeks that we are, we think it's kinda neat that those two vehicles rank near each other where torque and weight intersect.
As with the horsepower list, we've given you figures as pounds per every one pound-foot. Again broken down into broad price categories, we've got a mixed bag of 2014 and 2015 models here, too. Every effort has been made to select the most up-to-date prices and specs, and we've also to omitted some '14 cars that won't be re-upped after the ongoing yearly changeover.
Chris Harris pits Fiesta ST against Mercedes G63 AMG in 0-60 battle... sort of
Thu, 01 Aug 2013Vehicle performance tests are serious business, with reputations made or broken by things like braking distance, top speed, and lateral g-forces. King of the metrics, though, is the 0-60 run, which for unknown reasons has become the benchmark for what truly makes a car a performance machine.
Now, Chris Harris from Drive has turned the whole idea behind the sprint to 60 on its ear. Taking a new Ford Fiesta ST, Harris asks a simple question: would the ST be quicker to 60 on its own, or on a trailer being towed by a Mercedes-Benz G63 AMG?
It's a fair question, really. The Fiesta Harris tested hit 60 in 7.2 seconds on a slightly uphill section of runway. It should be noted that Harris quotes his ST at 182 horsepower, which is about 15 ponies less than what we're getting in the US, so these numbers might not hold up all that well against an American model. The G63 AMG, meanwhile, is a 536-horsepower monster, powered by a twin-turbo V8 that, able to propel the big SUV to 60 mph in just 5.2 seconds without towing a Fiesta.