Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1964 Ford Falcon Ranchero on 2040-cars

Year:1964 Mileage:91004 Color: Maroon /
 Dark Red
Location:

Raymore, Missouri, United States

Raymore, Missouri, United States
Engine:Gas
Transmission:Manual
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 4H27U233723 Year: 1964
Exterior Color: Maroon
Model: Ranchero
Interior Color: Dark Red
Trim: Base
Number of Cylinders: 6
Drive Type: Standard
Mileage: 91,004
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

1964 FORD FALCON RANCHERO. MAROON EXTERIOR/DARK RED INTERIOR. VERY ORIGINAL VEHICLE. SIX CYLINDER, STANDARD 3 SPEED. SOLID ORIGINAL BODY WITH NO VISUAL RUST. VEHICLE WAS REPAINTED 10 PLUS YEARS AGO AND MAY HAD VERY SMALL REPAIR TO LOWER REAR QUARTERS. SOLID OTHERWISE. IT'S BEEN PARKED FOR A LONG TIME IN A CLIMATE CONTROLLED BUILDING. RAN AND DROVE WHEN PARKED. HAD A SMALL EXHAUST LEAK AT THE MANIFOLD AND EXHAUST OFF TO REPLACE GASKET. NEVER GOT AROUND TO PUTTING IT BACK ON. BEING SOLD AS-IS. BUYERS MORE THAN WELCOME TO COME INSPECT PRIOR TO AUCTION ENDING. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CALL AND OR EMAIL ME. 

THANK YOU FOR LOOKING, CHRIS 816.590.7660

 I'VE BEEN PURCHASING OLD FORDS OVER THE YEARS AND I HAVE MORE THAN I'LL EVER BE ABLE TO ENJOY, SO I'M SELLING OFF A FEW. SEE MY OTHER AUCTIONS.

Auto Services in Missouri

West 60 Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 301 W Glenwood St, Fordland
Phone: (417) 889-2886

Wes Jerde Performance Center ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile Performance, Racing & Sports Car Equipment, Auto Racing
Address: 11320 Hickman Mills Dr, Lake-Winnebago
Phone: (816) 461-4017

Waterloo Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Diagnostic Service
Address: 622 N Market St, Sulphur-Springs
Phone: (618) 937-8438

The Dent Devil of St Louis ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Windshield Repair
Address: 14949 Manchester Road, Twin-Oaks
Phone: (636) 230-7900

Springfield Yamaha ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Motorcycle Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 5183 E Kearney St, Willard
Phone: (417) 862-4343

Spectrum Glass Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Windows
Address: Richwoods
Phone: (636) 614-0267

Auto blog

Nuclear-powered concept cars from the Atomic Age

Thu, 17 Jul 2014

In the 1950s and early 60s, the dawn of nuclear power was supposed to lead to a limitless consumer culture, a world of flying cars and autonomous kitchens all powered by clean energy. In Europe, it offered the then-limping continent a cheap, inexhaustible supply of power after years of rationing and infrastructure damage brought on by two World Wars.
The development of nuclear-powered submarines and ships during the 1940s and 50s led car designers to begin conceptualizing atomic vehicles. Fueled by a consistent reaction, these cars would theoretically produce no harmful byproducts and rarely need to refuel. Combining these vehicles with the new interstate system presented amazing potential for American mobility.
But the fantasy soon faded. There were just too many problems with the realities of nuclear power. For starters, the powerplant would be too small to attain a reaction unless the car contained weapons-grade atomic materials. Doing so would mean every fender-bender could result in a minor nuclear holocaust. Additionally, many of the designers assumed a lightweight shielding material or even forcefields would eventually be invented (they still haven't) to protect passengers from harmful radiation. Analyses of the atomic car concept at the time determined that a 50-ton lead barrier would be necessary to prevent exposure.

Ford Police Interceptors win acceleration war against Dodge, Chevy

Thu, 17 Oct 2013

Just last month, Ford announced its first-ever non-pursuit-rated version of the Police Interceptor sedan for agencies looking to maximize fuel economy, but that doesn't mean that Ford is giving up on chasing down the bad guys. While the Dodge Charger can lay claim to the fastest lap time at the Grattan Raceway test facility held by the Michigan State Police, the results are now in for the Police Vehicle Evaluation acceleration tests. And Ford's Police Interceptor duo (sedan and utility) came out on top.
In the acceleration tests, Ford says that the Taurus-based PI Sedan with the newly available 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6 was the quickest among prospective police cars in both 0-60 and 0-100 mile per hour times. The sedan posted a 0-60 time of 5.66 seconds with all-wheel drive and 5.71 seconds with front-wheel drive, besting V8-powered competitors like the Chevy Caprice and Dodge Charger by more than 0.3 seconds. These rivals close the gap on the AWD sedan in the 0-100 test with the Ford taking 13.5 seconds compared to the Chevy's time of 14.35 and the Dodge's time of 14.7.
As for utility vehicles, the Explorer-based PI Utility, which accounts for 60 percent of Ford's police vehicle sales, essentially went head-to-head with the V8-powered Chevy Tahoe with similar results. Equipped with the new EcoBoost engine option, this big SUV hit 60 mph in just 6.28 seconds and 100 mph in 15.51 seconds compared to times of 8.22 seconds and 21.95 seconds, respectively, for the Tahoe. Other important tests in the PVE include braking and top speed, but while no automakers have stepped up to boast about their numbers in either of these categories, Ford's images show that the V8 Caprice had the highest top speed of the cars at 155 mph while the Tahoe's 139-mph speed made it the fastest utility vehicle.

Defying Trump, major automakers finalize California emissions deal

Tue, Aug 18 2020

WASHINGTON — The California Air Resources Board (CARB) and major automakers on Monday confirmed they had finalized binding agreements to cut vehicle emissions in the state, defying the Trump administration's push for weaker curbs on tailpipe pollution. The agreements with carmakers Ford Motor Co, Volkswagen AG, Honda Motor Co and BMW AG were first announced in July 2019 as voluntary measures prompting anger from U.S. President Donald Trump. A month later, the Justice Department opened an antitrust probe into the agreements. The government ended the investigation without action. The Trump administration in March finalized a rollback of U.S. vehicle emissions standards to require 1.5% annual increases in efficiency through 2026. That is far weaker than the 5% annual increases in the discarded rules adopted under President Barack Obama. The 50-page California agreements, which extend through 2026, are less onerous than the standards finalized by the Obama administration but tougher than the Trump administration standards. The automakers have also agreed to electric vehicle commitments. Volvo Cars, owned by China's Geely Holdings, said in March it planned to join the automakers agreeing to the California requirements. It has also finalized its agreement. The settlement agreements say California and automakers agreed to resolve "potential legal disputes concerning the authority of CARB" and other states that have adopted California's standards. In May, a group of 23 U.S. states led by California and some major cities, challenged the Trump vehicle emissions rule. Other major automakers like General Motors Co, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV and Toyota Motor Corp did not join the California agreement. Those companies also sided with the Trump administration in a separate lawsuit over whether the federal government can strip California of the right to set zero emission vehicle requirements. Ford said the "final agreement will reduce emissions in our vehicles at a more stringent rate, support and incentivize the production of electrified products, and create regulatory certainty." BMW said "by setting these long-term, predictable, and achievable standards, we have the regulatory certainty that is necessary for long-term planning that will not only reduce greenhouse gas emissions but ultimately benefit consumers as well."Â