Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Very Cool 1936 Ford Tow Truck,vintage Wrecker on 2040-cars

Year:1936 Mileage:1
Location:

Backus, Minnesota, United States

Backus, Minnesota, United States
Advertising:

heres an interesting old truck.not originally a wrecker but the box was set on it for fun and decoration.it has served its purpose here now so it should have a new home with new owners who like as much as we do.the truck itself is a 36 ton and a half that was probably used as a farm truck or wood hauler like most were in our area.cab is pretty solid overall,the fenders have the expected dents and cracks.its mechanically complete but its condition is unknown.not much else to say,let the pictures speak for it.feel free to email with questions or request more pics.one thing to note,i do not have a title for it.we didnt have paper titles in this area when this truck was in use,so ill have to provide a bill of sale to the new owner.

truck is located in backus,mn 56435

218 821 9669 Ron

Auto Services in Minnesota

T K Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Tire Dealers
Address: 411 W Highway 2, Cohasset
Phone: (218) 328-5147

Steve`s Alignment Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 301 Old Highway 61 S, Askov
Phone: (320) 280-7244

St. Paul Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 910 Randolph Ave, Mendota
Phone: (651) 298-0956

R.B. Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 7952 Wallace Rd, Victoria
Phone: (952) 452-3793

R & S Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 38 Woodlyn Ave, North-Saint-Paul
Phone: (651) 483-4259

Napa Auto Parts - Genuine Parts Company ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Battery Supplies
Address: 14829 Martin Dr, Excelsior
Phone: (952) 949-1217

Auto blog

Honda Ridgeline, Ford Ecosport and Tesla profits | Autoblog Podcast #537

Thu, Apr 19 2018

On this week's Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by Green Editor John Beltz Snyder and Associate Editor Joel Stocksdale. We talk about driving the 2018 Ford Ecosport and Hyundai Accent. Joel tells us why he loves the naturally aspirated engine in our long-term Honda Ridgeline. We discuss Tesla's profitability claims, Johan de Nysschen leaving Cadillac and a possible date change for the Detroit Auto Show. As usual, we'll also spend a listener's money on a car. Autoblog Podcast #537 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown Driving the 2018 Ford Ecosport Driving the 2018 Hyundai Accent A love letter to the Honda Ridgeline's V6 Leadership change at Cadillac Will Tesla be profitable this year? Will NAIAS move to October? Spend my money Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on iTunes Related Video: Earnings/Financials Green Podcasts Detroit Auto Show Cadillac Ford Honda Hyundai Tesla Used Car Buying Truck Crossover SUV Economy Cars Electric Sedan

Ford Transit customs ready to work for SEMA

Fri, 31 Oct 2014

Ford's booth at the SEMA Show this year looks to have two, big themes. The Blue Oval is bringing over a dozen takes on the 2015 Mustang to the event, and it's now also announcing five customized versions on the 2015 Transit to join the modded pony cars. Each of the vans shows off a different use for the spacious commercial vehicle, from plush luxury to offroad ruggedness.
You probably don't think of the Transit as hitting the trails, but that's just what the take on the design from the Vegas Off-Road Experience (pictured above) is for. The company gives people the opportunity to drive a desert race truck, and this custom is meant to drive them to events. It should be able to take on the terrain a little better with off-road wheels and tires and fender flares, but inside passengers get serious luxury thanks to a 60-inch LED TV and video game systems.
Alternatively the blazing red Designed Travel Transit (right) is all about long road trips. The interior features four captain's chairs with heating, cooling and massage functions, and there's a 4K 50-inch TV to watch. For a touch of added class, the floor is made from hickory.

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.