Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Diesel, Dump Body, V8, Dual Rear Wheels, 4x4 on 2040-cars

Year:2004 Mileage:89032 Color: Green /
 Gray
Location:

Thomaston, Connecticut, United States

Thomaston, Connecticut, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Other
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Dealer
VIN: 1FDAF57P24ED66761 Year: 2004
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: Other Pickups
Mileage: 89,032
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Sub Model: Reg Cab 165"
Exterior Color: Green
Interior Color: Gray
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in Connecticut

Wilson Dodge Nissan ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 1530 East Main St. (Rt 202), Torrington
Phone: (860) 482-5555

Swedish Performance Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 370 E Main St, Madison
Phone: (203) 481-8299

Star Tire & Wheels ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 40 Boston Post Rd, Lyme
Phone: (203) 933-2886

Star Tire & Wheels ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 40 Boston Post Rd, Woodbridge
Phone: (203) 446-3063

Smith Bros Transmission ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 1627 Boston Post Rd, Old-Saybrook
Phone: (860) 399-6271

Sabo Auto Body Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 746 Derby Ave, Seymour
Phone: (203) 735-3301

Auto blog

Xcar celebrates 100-year anniversary with Model T tribute

Fri, Jan 9 2015

Never mind the fact that XCar hasn't been making videos for the last 100 years, the British duo have gone all silent-moving-pictures in order to make their centenary case for the Ford Model T, a car that was already seven years old in 1915. It's not a review, but a mostly sepia-tinged look at the car that started the mass-market adventure by taking that biblical advice to be fruitful and multiply and populate the Earth abundantly. Since it looks like Xcar is celebrating some kind of milestone, we've also included another video below of the first Xcar review we could find, covering the BMW M1, from the much more recent past - circa 2012.

Ford patents a multi-touch version of its classic keypad

Fri, Sep 9 2016

For decades, Ford has offered a keypad on the doors of their cars that would allow owners access with the right code. Amazingly, the keypad has survived almost unchanged except for a recent touch button version. A new patent from the Blue Oval shows the keypad may get a big upgrade soon. The first big change is that it looks like the keypad may move to the key fob. Although it might be possible to have it on the car itself as well, the patent only seems to focus on the key fob. In addition, the fob will now be a multi-touch pad similar to that of modern smartphones. This will allow for more diverse code entries, according to the patent's description. Instead of just a simple number code, owners could enter a code that involves swipes and keystrokes, and even simultaneous keystrokes. For instance, you could enter a code that requires swiping from 1 to 3, followed by holding 2 and 4 to unlock the car. The patent also seems to indicate that this keypad would then display unlock functions and other functions on the fob after the correct code is entered, thus making it more than just a way to unlock the car. As for the practical implications of this keypad system update, it could provide an added layer of security. If someone steals your keys, they would have to also know your access code to get into the car. Whether this would also help make the key and car harder to hack would remain to be seen, though. Another possible benefit could be the prevention of accidental lock and alarm button presses, although that likely isn't a common issue. There could be potential downsides as well. If used as an extra layer of security, the legitimate owner would have to punch in their code on the fob to get in, which would render proximity key benefits relatively useless. Moving the keypad to the fob would also mean owners couldn't get into their cars without having the key with them. We don't have any clues as to when this could become a feature, but it doesn't seem like it would be difficult to implement, so it could show up in the next few years. Related Video: News Source: United States Patent and Trademark OfficeImage Credit: Ford, United States Patent and Trademark Office / Ford Auto News Ford Lincoln Technology keyless entry

180,000 new vehicles are sitting, derailed by lack of transport trains

Wed, 21 May 2014

If you're planning on buying a new car in the next month or so, you might want to pick from what's on the lot, because there could be a long wait for new vehicles from the factory. Locomotives continue to be in short supply in North America, and that's causing major delays for automakers trying to move assembled cars.
According to The Detroit News, there are about 180,000 new vehicles waiting to be transported by rail in North America at the moment. In a normal year, it would be about 69,000. The complications have been industry-wide. Toyota, General Motors, Honda and Ford all reported experiencing some delays, and Chrysler recently had hundreds of minivans sitting on the Detroit waterfront waiting to be shipped out.
The problem is twofold for automakers. First, the fracking boom in the Bakken oil field in the Plains and Canada is monopolizing many locomotives. Second, the long, harsh winter is still causing major delays in freight train travel. The bad weather forced trains to slow down and carry less weight, which caused a backup of goods to transport. The auto companies resorted to moving some vehicles by truck, which was a less efficient but necessary option.