2015 Ford F-550 on 2040-cars
Cuddy, Pennsylvania, United States
More infos regarding my car at: johnniejggabardi@royalairforce.net .
This very low mileage truck was used in a smoke free environment. There are no dents or marks nor any mechanical
problems. (as should be with less than 7000 miles) This rollback has a low profile bed that is ideal for loading
sports cars, etc. with low clearance. Rear towbar. LED lighbar and LED lightbar on winch. This rollback has
never had a vehicle loaded on it. I paid over $78000 for this truck new. I bought it to use to haul rebuilt
motors from my engine shop to a local customer, and it is no longer needed for that purpose and that is the reason
for selling it. This is a chance to pick up a like new rollback at significant savings.
Ford Other Pickups for Sale
- 1950 ford other pickups(US $7,500.00)
- Ford: other pickups rat rod / hot rod(US $14,600.00)
- Ford: other(US $8,250.00)
- 1965 shelby backdraft roadster rt3 cobra(US $23,000.00)
- Ford: other pickups custom(US $23,000.00)
- Ford: other convertible(US $12,600.00)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Zuk Service Station ★★★★★
york transmissions & auto center ★★★★★
Wyoming Valley Motors Volkswagen ★★★★★
Workman Auto Inc ★★★★★
Wells Auto Wreckers ★★★★★
Weeping Willow Garage ★★★★★
Auto blog
2015 Ford Mustang production to begin on July 14? Not quite, says Ford
Thu, 10 Jul 2014Mustang6g.com believes that it has unlocked start date for 2015 Ford Mustang production citing a Ford dealer communiqué. According to the report, job one on the 2015 hardtop will allegedly start in just a few days, on July 14, although units that are known as "OK to Buy" won't enter production until September 9. The cars built between those dates are most likely final pre-production cars for the executive test fleet, and will likely include the cars we'll be driving at the media launch.
Sun worshippers, meanwhile, would seem to have a longer wait. Job one on the droptop supposedly isn't slated to start until September 14, with production models starting on October 27. As is the case with the hardtop, these final pre-pros are for the execs and media to test, while actual dealer orders will come from vehicles made after the October date.
After speaking to Ford, though, we wouldn't put a great deal of stock in those dates as reported. We reached out to Said Deep, Ford's North American Product Communications Manager.
Ford Mustang EcoBoost has fake engine soundtrack
Wed, 24 Sep 2014The 2015 Ford Mustang EcoBoost represents a huge change for the Blue Oval as the first pony car in decades to be available with a four-cylinder engine. But a recent tweet (below) from Road & Track raised our curiosity about the new vehicle. Editor Jason Cammisa pulled a fuse while driving the latest 'Stang with the 2.3-liter EcoBoost engine, and he found that both the stereo and engine went quiet in the cabin. That indicated the coupe might have some form of artificial engine sound being piped in - a feature not previously heavily reported for the model. Autoblog spoke with Ford engineer Shawn Carney who confirmed that only the turbocharged four-cylinder Mustang comes with this system, called Active Noise Control.
@jasoncammisa pulls fuse 27 on 4cyl #2015mustang EcoBoost. Both stereo & engine go quiet. #FakeEngineNoise #busted! pic.twitter.com/WNzQefCbtQ
- Road & Track (@RoadandTrack) September 17, 2014
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.