1950 Ford F1 4x4 Chasis Auto Ford 351 V8 Mickey Thompson's on 2040-cars
Framingham, Massachusetts, United States
1950 Ford F1 1970’s 4x4 Ford Chassis Ford 351 V8 Crate Motor Automatic transmission Edlebrock Intake Magnetti Marelli Carburetor Summit Racing Air Filter Mickey Thompson Wheels 33” Mickey Thompson Baja Tires Dual Flowmaster Exhaust 42706 Miles on chassis
Offering a truly unique 1950 Ford F1. This is a 1950 Ford F1 body on top of a 4X4 Ford Chassis with a 351 Ford Crate Motor. The truck sits on top of Brand New 16” Classic Mickey Thompson Wheels and 33” Mickey Thompson Tires, also Brand New. Both front and rear shocks were replaced. The truck is an Automatic Transmission with both High and Low 4X4 gearing. This F1 features a Ford 351 V8 Crate Motor. The motor includes an Edlebrock Intake, Magnetti Marelli Carburetor, and Ford Stamped Valve Covers. Brand New Exhaust system including Dual Flowmasters with 3 1/2 ” Chrome Tips. The interior is clean and straight. Bench Seat, Carpeting and Headliner are in decent condition. The truck retains its 1970’s Ford Gauge Cluster and Steering Wheel with Column Shift Lever. While the 4X4 shifter is on the floor. Paint has some cracking and rust spots and wood bed panels could be refinished. An easy driver with attitude. This truck has been recently gone over by one of the Northeast’s premier Hot Rod shops and is ready to be driven. |
Ford Other Pickups for Sale
- F550 xl 6.7l powerstroke diesel 16' general flat stake bed 40" stakes drw(US $37,975.00)
- 1932 ford model b pickup 4 cyl, 3spd, antique original street rod rat rod
- 1931 ford roadster pick up street rod hot rod gasser
- 1949 ford pickup
- 1950 ford f2 truck(US $6,300.00)
- 2001 f550 super duty 7.3 power stroke auotmatic f350 f450 diesel
Auto Services in Massachusetts
York Ford ★★★★★
Westgate Tire & Auto Ctr ★★★★★
Westgate Tire & Auto Center ★★★★★
Tire Barn Inc ★★★★★
The Driveway Doctors ★★★★★
Shepherd`s Auto Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
Cosworth double-feature is XCar's a drool-worthy look back
Wed, Jun 11 2014While American fans of Ford performance cars in the '80s and early '90s were loving the 5.0 Mustang, Taurus SHO and, for those who wanted to be a little different, the Merkur XR4Ti, British fans of the Blue Oval were getting their own unique take on speed. The Sierra RS Cosworth (which was similar but not identical to the aforementioned Merkur) and later Escort RS Cosworth were the stuff of dreams with huge wings, hood vents and big power for their time and class. XCar Films aims to find out whether it is little more than nostalgia that makes these classics famous or it really is their legitimate performance. Thanks to its Formula One and racing success, Cosworth was already a well-established performance name in the UK by the time it began selling tuned engines to Ford for the Sierra and Escort. The Sierra RS Cosworth hit the scene in 1986 with a turbocharged, 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine with 204 horsepower and rear-wheel drive. Its huge wing at the back signaled it immediately as something special, and it proved to be a performance powerhouse on and off the track. When it was retired, Ford replaced it with the Escort RS Cosworth that used an upgraded version of the same engine with 217 hp, all-wheel drive and an even bigger rear wing to net yet more racing victories. XCar really gets into the spirit of the time, opening the video with the lo-fi grain of '80s and '90s TV, but to find out whether the Cossies stand up to modern scrutiny, you have to watch the video below. Stay tuned until the end to enjoy them at their best with some vintage motorsports footage. This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.
Ford will probably never offer two RS models at the same time
Mon, 18 Mar 2013Autocar has some sour news for fans of go-fast Ford products. According to Roelant de Waard, Ford's president of marketing in Europe, the automaker will probably never offer more than one RS performance model for sale at the same time. That statement runs contrary earlier rumblings that suggested Ford would launch its next-generation Focus RS in 2015 and follow the hatch with a spate of other vehicles with an RS badge. But de Waard has made it clear that Ford of Europe is now focused on squarely on the next Mustang, even though there may be more RS models on the way eventually.
"What is clear is that the RS shouldn't be a series, or a car badge that we have in our portfolio all the time. It is an extreme car - something more than ST," he said.
That philosophy makes plenty of sense. We loved the old Focus RS - shown above in RS500 trim - because it was generally bonkers and plenty exclusive. Diluting either aspect is sure to end in disappointment for everyone involved.
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.