Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Ford Mustang Gt on 2040-cars

US $2,000.00
Year:1966 Mileage:165000 Color: Red
Location:

Silver Point, Tennessee, United States

Silver Point, Tennessee, United States
Advertising:

1966 A Code Mustang Factory GT Coupe. This is a true factory GT. The car has never undergone restoration or been modified in any way from original 1966 model. Since less than 5,000 miles have been put on the rebuilt engine. Compression was 145 to 160 psi and oil pressure was 45 psi. The carburetor still has the original tag in place and is an Autolite 4100. Door panels, armrests, seat covers and carpet have all been renewed to Warranty Plate Trim Code 26. Weather stripping, Headliner, Sun visor Pads and Padded Dash are all in excellent condition. Original A/M radio, gauges, turn signals, courtesy lights and back up lights are all in proper working order.

Auto Services in Tennessee

Wheeler`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 114 Coles Ferry Rd, Castalian-Springs
Phone: (615) 230-7483

Wayne`s Radiator Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Radiators Automotive Sales & Service
Address: 710 S Polk St, Tullahoma
Phone: (931) 455-7694

Watson Auto Sales West ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 1515 Hillsboro Blvd, Manchester
Phone: (931) 728-2255

Universal Kia Franklin ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1413 Murfreesboro Rd, College-Grove
Phone: (877) 957-1442

The Automotive Solution ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 7825 US Highway 51 N, Rosemark
Phone: (901) 872-2442

Taylor Tom Chevrolet-Pontiac-Oldsmobile Truck-Chrysler Plymouth-Dodge-Jeep ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 11989 Highway 22, Martin
Phone: (731) 587-9544

Auto blog

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

Ford recalls Five Hundred, Mercury Montego sedans over fuel tank woes

Mon, 18 Jul 2011

Ford has announced through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that it is recalling nearly 3,000 examples of its Five Hundred and Mercury Montego (pictured) sedans from the 2007 model year.
The action, which affects 2,945 vehicles, is due to potentially defective welds between the filler neck and the fuel tank, a condition that could result in a fuel leak or the smell of gasoline reaching the occupants. In the worst-case scenario, a leak could cause a fire. Cars with the affected fuel tank problem could see an illuminated dashboard warning light as a result of the evaporative emissions leak being detected.
Ford will inspect and replace the fuel tank at no cost to owners (those who have already had the procedure done at-cost can apply for reimbursement), and the Dearborn automaker will begin notifying Five Hundred and Montego owners beginning August 15. Check out the official NHTSA press release after the jump for further details.

2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid

Thu, 02 May 2013

No Prius Killer
As much as we enthusiasts like to rail on the lowly Toyota Prius as the harbinger of death for all we hold dear, there's no denying the machine's absolute and interminable grip on the hybrid hatchback market in the United States. Toyota has so thoroughly sunk its teeth into the segment that you can clearly hear the automaker's incisors clacking against one another with the conclusion of each financial quarter. And there's little wonder why. Buyers can plop down less than $25,000 and have a runabout that can return up to an estimated 51 miles per gallon in the city, leaving every other entry on the market with precious little gristle to gnaw on.
Enter the 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid. With its claimed 47 mpg combined, the funky little hatch from Europe already falls behind the 48 mpg city offered by the Prius, but that marginal sacrifice in fuel economy could be a small price to pay for buyers who want a credible alternative to the stalwart Toyota. Unfortunately, like the Fusion Hybrid, the C-Max Hybrid had trouble even approaching its Environmental Protection Agency estimates during our time with the car.