Ford Mustang Base on 2040-cars
North Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
1966 Mustang coupe. Original color is Red, original V8 car. Condition is as follows: Engine/drivetrain: Rebuilt V8 with quiet gear drive, new accessories, and low miles. C4 transmission, unknown condition but shifts good. Engine fires right up, runs good, and doesn`t smoke, just needs fine tuned. Great oil pressure and doesn`t run hot. Transmission shifts good. 8 inch rear end seems in good shape. Brakes are new. Steering box and front end feel tight but don`t look to have been recently rebuilt. may or may not need alignment. Tires are in good shape. New shocks, rear leaf springs, and fat sway bar with urethane bushings. Interior: Driver condition, needs a dash pad. If I were keeping the car, I would throw in a complete interior kit. Steering column is tight but needs a new cancelling cam. Window and door regulators work good. Blinkers, headlights, running lights and brake lights all work good, wipers work good too. Body: Excellent body with nice original quarter panels and floors needing only MINOR bodywork as you can see. Pictures say it all. Never in a serious accident. No battery tray rust. Windows, doorjambs, wheelwell lips, quarter panels, cowl, torque boxes, unibody, all have no rust. Hood, drivers fender, and door have been replaced because of a previous minor scrape, but core support and unibody are straight. Replacement door has a little body filler and a spot of rust at the bottom front but is useable as is.
Ford Mustang for Sale
- Ford mustang laguna seca(US $15,000.00)
- Ford mustang glx(US $2,000.00)
- Ford mustang gt(US $8,000.00)
- Ford mustang(US $6,000.00)
- Ford mustang(US $10,000.00)
- Ford mustang fastback sportroof(US $25,000.00)
Auto Services in Nevada
V & V Automotive ★★★★★
SUV & Trucks R Us ★★★★★
Sunset Collision Center Inc. ★★★★★
Sin City Performance ★★★★★
Silver State Automotive ★★★★★
Safe Autocare ★★★★★
Auto blog
Top torque-to-weight ratios under $100k, $50k and $25k
Tue, 07 Oct 2014Horsepower may steal a lot of headlines, but the always-more-complex torque figure is often a critical one for both the workingman and the motoring playboy. The measure of rotational force represents the twist that can liquefy one's tires or haul one's horse trailer. Good stuff.
It follows then, that as with the horsepower-to-weight list that we assembled for you a few months ago, a list of cars that offer the most pound-feet with the fewest pounds to carry, is an interesting one to break down. Sure, there's a big difference in how the torque is applied from a turbocharged six-cylinder in a Swedish luxury sedan and a massive heavy-duty truck's turbo-diesel. But being the car/stat geeks that we are, we think it's kinda neat that those two vehicles rank near each other where torque and weight intersect.
As with the horsepower list, we've given you figures as pounds per every one pound-foot. Again broken down into broad price categories, we've got a mixed bag of 2014 and 2015 models here, too. Every effort has been made to select the most up-to-date prices and specs, and we've also to omitted some '14 cars that won't be re-upped after the ongoing yearly changeover.
Ford readying Ranger-based Everest SUV?
Fri, 21 Feb 2014Way back in August, we showed you a Ford concept for the Australian market called the Everest. Now, we can show you that work on the new Ranger-based SUV is well under way.
At this stage, it's still quite clearly a mule (note the misalignment of the front and rear doors), wearing the Ranger's front end and the rump of Ford's overseas Territory crossover. The wheelbase is shorter than a Ranger, according to our spy photographers, which strikes us as somewhat odd for a more passenger-oriented vehicle. Disc brakes should be fitted at all four corners, while the new SUV, which will almost certainly wear the Everest name, should sport a new rear suspension.
In terms of looks, we're expecting the Everest Concept to inform the appearance of the production model. Naturally, there will also be some interior tweaks, particularly around the dashboard, which is covered in these photos.
Car technology I'm thankful and unthankful for
Mon, Nov 27 2017The past few years have seen a surge of tech features in new vehicles — everything from cloud-based content to semi-autonomous driving. While some of it makes the driving experience better, not all tech is useful or well thought out. Automakers who are adept at drivetrains, ride quality and in-cabin comforts often fail at infotainment interfaces and connectivity. From testing dozens of vehicles each year and in the spirit of gratitude, here are three car tech features I'm thankful — and a trio I could live without. Thanks Connected search: This seems like a no-brainer since everyone already has it on their smartphones, but not all automakers include it in the dashboard and as part of their nav systems. The best ones, such as Toyota Entune, leverage a driver's connected device to search for a range of services and don't charge a subscription or require a separate data plan for the car. I also like how systems like Chrysler Uconnect use Yelp or other apps to find everything from coffee to gas stations and allow searching via voice recognition. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto: It took two of the largest tech companies to get in-dash infotainment right. While they have their disadvantages (you're forced to use Apple Maps with CarPlay, for example), the two smartphone-integration platforms make it easier and safer to use their respective native apps for phoning, messaging, music and more behind the wheel by transferring a familiar UI to the dashboard — with no subscription required. Heated seats and steering wheels: I really appreciate these simple but pleasant features come wintertime. It's easy to get spoiled by bun-warmers on frosty mornings and using a heated steering wheel to warm the cold hands. I recently tested a 2018 Mercedes-Benz E400 Coupe that also had heated armrest that added to a cozy luxury experience. Bonus points for brands like Buick that allow setting seat heaters to turn on when the engine is remotely started. No thanks Automaker infotainment systems: Automakers have probably poured millions into creating their own infotainment systems, with the result largely being frustration on the part of most car owners. And Apple CarPlay and Android Auto coming along to make them obsolete. While some automaker systems, such as Toyota Entune and FCA's Uconnect, are easy and intuitive to use, it seems that high-end systems (I'm looking at you BMW iDrive and Mercedes-Benz COMAND) are the most difficult.