Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

76 Mustang Cobra Ii on 2040-cars

Year:1976 Mileage:75000 Color: White /
 Blue
Location:

Naylor, Missouri, United States

Naylor, Missouri, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Hatchback
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:302
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 0013Z69F140519 Year: 1976
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: Mustang
Trim: Cobra
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control
Drive Type: auto
Mileage: 75,000
Sub Model: cobra
Disability Equipped: No
Exterior Color: White
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Blue
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

My wife and I are selling our 76 Mustang Cobra II ( this is a real cobra with original build sheet) and only 75,000 original miles. This is a very nice car with just a few small paint chips her and there which have been touched up with correct color paint. The interior is in very good shape as you can see in the pics. It has the original 302 that has older 289 heads and a four barrel intake and carb that really gets this car up and going. As I stated before it has the original build sheet and has been signed by Carroll Shelby with paperwork and certification. This was a highly option car with power brakes ac and cruise control ( no ac on the car now). All gauges and lights work as they should and there are no leaks and it is rust free. I have an extra set of cobra wheels with center caps and beauty rings that will go with the sale. It has the original spare and jack which match the four extra wheels. If you have any questions please ask. Thanks for looking.

Auto Services in Missouri

Westport Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 2171 W Port Plaza Dr, Saint-Ann
Phone: (314) 576-7339

Sterling Ave Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 1841 E Main St, Warsaw
Phone: (660) 438-4599

Santa Fe Glass Co Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 1306 S Commercial St, Strasburg
Phone: (866) 449-9818

Osage Auto Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 6215 Fire Station Rd, Osage-Beach
Phone: (573) 348-4073

North West Auto Body & Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 12990 Saint Charles Rock Rd, Bridgeton
Phone: (314) 770-2700

Napa Auto Parts - Horn`S Auto Supply ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Engines-Supplies, Equipment & Parts, Truck Equipment & Parts
Address: 217 S 169 Hwy, Gower
Phone: (816) 424-6479

Auto blog

2015 Ford Mustang Convertible shown on Twitter [UPDATE w/video]

Thu, 05 Dec 2013

It hasn't yet been 12 hours since the hotly anticipated 2015 Ford Mustang has been let out into public view. After a series of evocative leaks over the course of the last days, we brought you a full deep dive of the sixth-generation pony car at the dawning of today. And yet, here we are rushing to bring you news of a new Mustang variant, already.
Be it part of a plan to keep the Mustang fervor at full boil, or a misunderstood email somewhere in the chain of command, Ford UK has unceremoniously tweeted a picture of the 2015 Ford Mustang Convertible. For a newly global Mustang, getting our first look at the droptop from the convertible-crazy British does make some amount of sense.
As for details, well, you're looking at them. Brandon Turkus reported yesterday that the Mustang 'vert would make use of a fully electric convertible mechanism, and that it would be of fabric construction rather than some kind of retractable hardtop. We see here that the fabric part is clearly true, and it does look as though Ford may still be employing the same kind of manually attached tonneau cover that exists right now. Of course, our view from this angle isn't great, and the particulars are still up in the air.

Ford Q1 profits dragged down by warranty costs

Fri, 25 Apr 2014

General Motors isn't the only Detroit automaker posting falling profits in the first quarter. Ford just released its Q1 2014 financial data, and it reported a net income of $989 million, down $622 million from Q1 2013. The drop is partially blamed on higher warranty and recall expenses than the company had anticipated.
Financially, Ford suffered a rough quarter almost across the board. Its pre-tax profit of $1.4 billion was also down $765 million from a year ago. Things were even worse in the North American market where operating profit fell significantly to $1.5 billion, down from $2.392 billion in Q1 2013. However, its global revenue ticked up slightly to $35.9 billion, from $35.6 billion in this period in 2013.
Ford admitted that it spent about $900 million on expenses that it hadn't planned for during this quarter. According to Reuters, the company paid about $400 million in additional warranty and recall costs in North America. The automaker didn't explain why the costs were so much higher than expected. However, in the last three months, Ford has had several recalls, including on the 2001-2004 Escape for rust, Explorer for its steering, Edge for its fuel line and others.

EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate

Mon, 26 Aug 2013


The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.