2009 Ford Mustang Gt on 2040-cars
4676 Route 152 South, Lavalette, West Virginia, United States
Engine:V8 4.6L
Transmission:5-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1ZVHT82H595121504
Stock Num: U51014
Make: Ford
Model: Mustang GT
Year: 2009
Exterior Color: Brilliant Silver Metallic
Interior Color: Dark charcoal
Options: Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 2 Doors
Mileage: 66427
Outstanding customer service and unbeatable deals only at River City Ford. We Say Yes! www.rivercityford.com 888-298-0399 At River City Ford our commitment to customer service is second to none. As one of the premier dealership's in the country our inventory moves quickly PLEASE contact us quickly to check availability for your new vehicle. Easy, no-worry financing available for all credit situations. We go out of our way to earn your business with our low prices & friendly customer service. 888-298-0399
Ford Mustang for Sale
2011 ford mustang(US $18,711.00)
2014 ford mustang(US $20,496.00)
2014 ford mustang(US $31,015.00)- 2014 ford mustang(US $40,283.00)
2014 ford mustang(US $39,727.00)
2014 ford mustang(US $23,203.00)
Auto Services in West Virginia
Total Image Paint & Collision ★★★★★
Shartzer Auto Wrecking ★★★★★
Sammy D`s Preowned Auto ★★★★★
Novus Auto Glass ★★★★★
Meadows Body Shop ★★★★★
Harpold`s Garage ★★★★★
Auto blog
2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid
Mon, 01 Apr 2013Your Mileage May Vary
As difficult as it is to write this, I was actually excited about the 2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid. With the beautiful looks of the newest midsize fighter from Ford and a fuel economy estimate capable of shaming even the stalwart Camry Hybrid, the battery-augmented four-door seemed like a recipe for unabashed success. But appearances love nothing more than swapping our boundless enthusiasm for cold platters of disappointment. The 2013 Fusion Hybrid gets hobbled right out of the gate with a lofty price tag, and real-world driving keeps the sedan from even approaching those EPA figures.
With so many excellent midsize hybrids on the market, is there any reason to consider the newest Fusion Hybrid? Are sharp aesthetics, a well-executed interior and capable driving dynamics enough to overcome the machine's shortfalls? Not from where I'm standing.
Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #329 LIVE!
Mon, 15 Apr 2013We're set to record Autoblog Podcast #329 tonight, and you can drop us your questions and comments via our Q&A module below. Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes if you haven't already done so, and if you want to take it all in live, tune in to our UStream (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.
Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #329
Subcompact sales slump, yet again
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.