Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2007 Ford Mustang Gt Coupe 2-door 4.6l on 2040-cars

Year:2007 Mileage:65837 Color: Gray /
 Black
Location:

Chester, Illinois, United States

Chester, Illinois, United States
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:4.6L 281Cu. In. V8 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Condition:
Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ...
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 1zvht82h375295570
Year: 2007
Make: Ford
Model: Mustang
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: GT Coupe 2-Door
Options: Leather Seats
Drive Type: RWD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 65,837
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Sub Model: GT
Exterior Color: Gray
Interior Color: Black
Number of Doors: 2
Number of Cylinders: 8

2007 Ford Mustang GT

It is a 2007 Mustang GT Premium 5 speed. 65837 miles, Always garaged when not being driven. Cool white HID headlights and driving lights, Hurst shifter, K&N intake, Steeda lowering kit, Pioneer touch screen stereo, Shaker sound system, Flowmaster mufflers sounds very aggressive, Xpipe mid pipe, ford strut tower brace, Carbon Fiber look dash, leather seats with no rips or signs of wear, Tinted windows. Oil changed every 3,000 miles with mobil one full synthetic oil. New tires less than 1,000 miles ago. Both interior and exterior are in amazing shape. As is no warranty expressed or implied. $500 due within 24 hours of auction end. 

 

Auto Services in Illinois

World Class Motor Cars ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1245 Ogden Ave, Warrenville
Phone: (630) 493-1600

Wilkins Hyundai-Mazda ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 750 N York St, Elmhurst
Phone: (630) 279-3000

Unibody ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1891 N Milwaukee Ave, Brookfield
Phone: (773) 235-1334

Turpin Chevrolet Inc ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1048 S Chicago St, Orion
Phone: (309) 944-2173

Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 6574 E Riverside Blvd, Garden-Prairie
Phone: (815) 639-1239

Triple T Car Wash Lube & Detail Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Car Wash, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 1905 W Bradley Ave, Champaign
Phone: (217) 352-9200

Auto blog

Fields 'required' to use private aircraft, could make $5.25M as Ford CEO this year

Thu, 03 Jul 2014

Mark Fields' travels on the friendly skies will soon be a relatively personal affair, as the new CEO at Ford will be required to resume air travel via the company's private planes. Fields caught plenty of flak in 2007 for flying on the company's dime to visit his family in Florida. He's since flown commercial.
According to Ford spokesperson Susan Krusel, who spoke to Bloomberg, Fields (pictured above right, with Bill Ford, Jr. at center and Alan Mulally at left) will switch to private travel "for safety and to maximize his availability for company business." In addition to his new travel arrangements, the 53-year-old exec's salary and bonuses have been revealed.
Regulatory filings by Ford revealed that Fields, whose first day in the big chair was July 1, will receive a base salary this year of $1.25 million and he'll be eligible for $3.5 million in bonuses, both of which are lower than Alan Mulally's $2 million salary and $5.88 million in bonuses received last year. That's also lower than General Motors CEO Mary Barra's alleged $1.6-million salary and considerably less than Sergio Marchionne's $3.19-million fixed salary from Fiat. Despite falling short of other CEOs, Fields' new pay still represents a 33-percent increase over his pay as Chief Operating Officer.

Porsche, Jaguar continue dominance in 2015 JD Power APEAL study

Wed, Jul 22 2015

The top of JD Power's 2015 APEAL Study has not changed much in the last year. Porsche remains No. 1 with Jaguar nipping at its heels, although both premium brands saw their overall score fall compared to 2014. For those that need a refresher, the APEAL Study looks at how "gratifying" a vehicle is to own and drive, rating cars and brands on a 1,000-point scale. The industry average for 2015 has increased from 794 to 798, while the total number of automakers that finished above the curve increased from 16 to 20. While Porsche and Jaguar finished at the top, their scores dropped eight and seven points, respectively, to 874 and 855. The top "non-premium" brand was Mini, which scored an impressive 825, up from 795. If the BMW-owned British marque is still a bit too premium for your tastes, last year's non-premium winner, Hyundai, did climb five points and is this year's runner up. At the opposite end of the scale, Smart sits at the very bottom of the rankings, with a score of 683 (it didn't appear on the 2014 rankings). Fiat also dropped, from fourth worst in 2014 to second worst in 2015, despite the 500 being named most appealing city car. Subaru made an impressive climb, from third worst to seventh, falling just 10 points shy of the industry average and two points south of the non-premium average. In the individual vehicle segments, eight brands earned multiple awards, with Ford, Chevrolet, and Porsche earning three apiece. Surprise segment victories included the new Ford Expedition, which beat out Chevy's popular Suburban. The Infiniti QX80 bested the likes of the Cadillac Escalade and Range Rover for best large luxury SUV, and the Dodge Challenger beat its muscle car rivals from Ford and Chevy. Most of the victories, though, were quite predictable. The Mazda6 and CX-5 took wins for the midsize sedan and compact SUV categories respectively, while the Volkswagen Golf captured the compact car win. The Ford F-150 won the large pickup category, while the Porsche Cayman was named most appealing compact premium sporty car. Check out the official release on the 2015 APEAL Study, available below, from JD Power. 2015 U.S. APEAL Study Results The latest safety-related technologies are among the drivers of customer satisfaction with new vehicles, according to the J.D. Power 2015 U.S.

Ford fights back against patent trolls

Fri, Feb 13 2015

Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.