2007 Ford Mustang on 2040-cars
Haddock, Georgia, United States
Please message me with questions at: mingmrrumph@ukhouse.com .
Up for sale is my 2007 Shelby GT500 Coupe. White with Blue stripes, this Shelby is reminiscent of the classic
design by Carroll Shelby. Currently, the vehicle has 31,876 miles. This vehicle is a garage-kept, non-smoker,
never raced, never wrecked, always babied, adult-driven weekend vehicle. It has always been cared for, all
maintenance completed on schedule. All fluids (engine oil, transmission fluid, differential fluid) were changed
with Amsoil fluids Spring 2015, engine oil currently Motorcraft (Ford), change due in 2k miles.
This vehicle has had the TSB for clutch issues completed. It currently has the clutch from the 2010 GT500s, you
will face no clutch issues with this '07.
This vehicle has all factory components available.
Full list of aftermarket components:
AFCO Heat Exchanger
JLT 123 Cold Air Intake
Lethal O/R X-Pipe
Bassani AxleBack Mufflers
VMP Tuning 2.5" Upper Pulley
VMP Tuning Tunes - 91mpg, 93p, 100r.
JLT Oil Catch Can
Innokin 55w HID headlights
PA Performance 200A HO Alternator w/ KnuKonceptz Kolossus Fleks Kable 4Ga.(Tinned OFC) to battery
This vehicle has been dynod at 551RWHP/551RWTQ
This GT500 also has a high-end custom stereo, with a total output of 1,700 watts RMS: (please note that stereo will
be changed back to factory Shaker 500 system, to keep stereo there will an additional cost of $1,000 on top of the
sale of the vehicle.)
All stereo components and wiring was installed by an MECP Certified installation technician:
Pioneer Avic-X940BT head unit w/Navigation
12" Kicker L7 in factory Kicker ported enclosure
Kicker DX1000.1 amplifier for L7
Door/Rear Deck Speakers: Kicker CS6x8
Lower Door Speakers: Kicker QS65 6.5" Carbon Fiber Component Speakers ($500/set) (in Coaxial configuration)
Kicker IX500.4 Amplifier for mids/highs
XS-Power XP950 secondary battery (Isolation Circuit Installed)
Full 0Ga. KnuKonceptz Kollosus Fleks cables (Tinned OFC)/4Ga. to amplifiers
This stereo was installed with quality in mind, and all outputs are true RMS rated outputs, cabling by KnuKonceptz
is true OFC (0Ga. has 5,145 strands)
Ford Mustang for Sale
Ford: mustang boss 302 laguna seca(US $19,500.00)
Ford: mustang 2dr convertible shelby gt500(US $19,900.00)
1965 ford mustang(US $12,600.00)
1965 ford mustang fastback 2+2(US $12,900.00)
1969 ford mustang mustang(US $11,800.00)
1969 ford mustang mustang(US $11,800.00)
Auto Services in Georgia
Wright`s Car Care Inc ★★★★★
Top Quality Car Care ★★★★★
TNT Transmission ★★★★★
Tires & More Complete Car Care ★★★★★
Tims Auto Service ★★★★★
T-N-T Transmission Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford Mustang Mach-E fails Sweden's moose test
Wed, Sep 29 2021The infamous moose test has claimed another casualty. This time it's the Ford Mustang Mach-E AWD Long Range, which was tested in an electric four-way alongside the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Skoda Enyaq iV (an electric utility vehicle closely related to the Volkswagen ID.4 that is sold in the United States). According to the Swedish testers at Teknikens Varld, Ford's electric car not only failed to hit the speed necessary for a passing grade, it didn't perform well at slower speeds, either. To pass the outlet's moose test, a car has to complete a rapid left-right-straight S-shaped pattern marked by cones at a speed of at least 72 km/h (44.7 miles per hour). The test is designed to mimic the type of avoidance maneuver a driver would have to take in order to avoid hitting something that wandered into the road, which in Sweden may be a moose but could just as easily be a deer or some other member of the animal kingdom elsewhere in the world, or possibly a child or car backing into the motorway. Not only is the maneuver very aggressive, it's also performed with weights belted into each seat and more weight added to the cargo area to hit the vehicle's maximum allowable carrying capacity. The Mustang Mach-E only managed to complete the moose test at 68 km/h (42.3 mph), well below the passing-grade threshold. Even at much lower speeds, Teknikens Varld says the Mach-E (which boasts the highest carrying capacity and was therefore loaded with more weight than the rest of the vehicles tested in this quartet) is "too soft in the chassis" and suffers from "too slow steering." Proving that it is indeed possible to pass the test, the Hyundai and Skoda completed the maneuver at the 44.7-mph figure required for a passing grade and the Tesla did it at 46.6 mph, albeit with less weight in the cargo area. It's not clear whether other versions of the Mustang Mach-E would pass the test. It's also unknown if Ford will make any changes to its chassis tuning or electronic stability control software, as some other automakers have done after a poor performance from Teknikens Varld, to improve its performance in the moose test. Related video:
2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid
Thu, 02 May 2013No Prius Killer
As much as we enthusiasts like to rail on the lowly Toyota Prius as the harbinger of death for all we hold dear, there's no denying the machine's absolute and interminable grip on the hybrid hatchback market in the United States. Toyota has so thoroughly sunk its teeth into the segment that you can clearly hear the automaker's incisors clacking against one another with the conclusion of each financial quarter. And there's little wonder why. Buyers can plop down less than $25,000 and have a runabout that can return up to an estimated 51 miles per gallon in the city, leaving every other entry on the market with precious little gristle to gnaw on.
Enter the 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid. With its claimed 47 mpg combined, the funky little hatch from Europe already falls behind the 48 mpg city offered by the Prius, but that marginal sacrifice in fuel economy could be a small price to pay for buyers who want a credible alternative to the stalwart Toyota. Unfortunately, like the Fusion Hybrid, the C-Max Hybrid had trouble even approaching its Environmental Protection Agency estimates during our time with the car.
Want a V8 on the cheap? Buy a work truck
Thu, Aug 3 2017In case you didn't notice, V8 cars have gotten pretty expensive. If you want a modern muscle car like the Dodge Challenger R/T, Ford Mustang GT, or Chevy Camaro SS, you'll need between $34,000 and $38,000 for a stripped out example of one. The cheapest of those is the Challenger, and the priciest is the Camaro. These are also the cheapest V8 cars the companies offer. But if you absolutely have to have a V8 for less, there is an option, work trucks. As it turns out, all of the Big Three offer their most basic work trucks with V8s. And because they're so basic, they're pretty affordable, especially when sticking with the standard two-wheel drive. A Ram 1500 Tradesman with a V8 can be had for as little as $29,840, which is a little more than $4,000 less than a Challenger R/T. For a bit more at $30,275, you can have a Chevy Silverado W/T, almost $8,000 less than a Camaro SS. The most expensive is the V8 Ford F-150 starts at a starting price of $30,670, which is a bit over $5,000 less than the Mustang. Of course you'll be in an ultra bare bones vehicle with few comforts, and the price will go up if you add stuff, but we're bargain hunting here, and sacrifices are sometimes necessary. Besides, what you lose in comfort, you gain in loads of cargo space and towing (try to look at the bright side). Also, as a side note, all three trucks are available with optional electronic locking rear differentials. At the discounted price of these trucks, you still get a heaping helping of power. The most potent of the trio is the Ram 1500 Tradesman with 395 horsepower and 410 pound-feet of torque generated by a 5.7-liter V8. Compared with the Challenger R/T, the Ram is up by 20 horsepower and they're tied for torque. The value proposition is even more stark between the two vehicles when looking at the price per horsepower. Each pony in the Ram costs $75.54, while the Challenger charges you $90.91. The Challenger is also more expensive per horsepower than its close competitors. The F-150's 5.0-liter V8 is just barely behind the Ram with 395 horsepower and 400 pound-feet of torque. That's still more power than the Challenger, and it matches the torque of the 2017 Mustang GT. On the down side, it still would be down 20 horsepower on that same 2017 Mustang, and it's behind by 60 horsepower and 20 pound-feet on the new 2018 Mustang GT. The F-150 also just edges out the Mustang in the dollar per horsepower measure.