2005 - Ford Mustang on 2040-cars
Richland, South Carolina, United States
I have had the car since day 1 and bought it brand new 9 years ago. The car was kept mostly in a climate controlled garage. I have the owners manual, 2 remotes, and 3 keys. The only reason why i'm selling the car is because i'm planning on buying a house and getting married. Please, ask all the questions you need! I will try to be as detailed as possible. This car has some modifications: V6 rear end replaced with a Posi Trac GT Rear End with 3:55 Gears (This is not a junk yard rear! It was bought from a company that turns Roush Mustangs into High Performance Cars as a low millage take off) Red Caliper Covers New Traction Bars Dual - Bassani Exhaust Mufflers Kenwood DNX7120 with Navigation and Bluetooth Module 2 - 10" Alpine Type R Subs Alpine Amp MRP-M1000 Side Window and Fender Louvers Back Aluminum Window Louvers Sequential Taillight Signal Systems Trunk Cover Material with Pony Logo on deck lid. Bremmer Kraft 19" Rims with Staggered Faulkin tires. 245/35 in the front, and 275/35 in the back. Homelink Review Mirror with Compass and Auto Dimming. Allows 3 programmable Garage remotes. Recent Repairs: New Battery New Alternator New Harmonic Balancer Due to some recent questions from some fellow e-bayer users: I did all the oil changes and always used synthetic oil. I did a radiator flush late last year. I changed the rear end fluid about 25,000 miles ago with synthetic oil. I replaced the ball joints when I had the GT rear end put in. I did last year have new break pads installed. I can't remember if i had the rotors cut or replaced. One tire was replaced because I had gotten a nail in the sidewall and it couldn't be patched, so i had a new tire installed. (see pictures) The cruise control sometimes turns on and works, and sometimes it doesn't turn on and work. I honestly have never really used it for as long as i've owned the car, and don't know what it would cost to repair. Please send an e-bay message with questions.
Ford Mustang for Sale
- 1970 - ford mustang(US $8,000.00)
- 2006 - ford mustang(US $7,000.00)
- 1969 - ford mustang(US $16,000.00)
- 1969 - ford mustang(US $29,000.00)
- 1969 - ford mustang(US $29,000.00)
- 1993 - ford mustang(US $7,000.00)
Auto Services in South Carolina
Wilson Chrysler Dodge Jeep Inc ★★★★★
Wilburn Auto Body Shop At Keith Hawthorne Ford ★★★★★
Uptown Custom Paint and Collision ★★★★★
Top Quality Collision Center ★★★★★
The Glass Shoppe ★★★★★
Suddeth`s Automotive Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
Detroit 3 to implement delayed unified towing standards for 2015
Tue, Feb 11 2014Car buyers have a responsibility to be well-informed consumers. That's not always a very simple task, but some guidelines are self-evident. If you live in a very snowy climate, you generally know a Ford Mustang or Chevrolet Camaro might not be as viable a vehicle choice as an all-wheel drive Explorer or Traverse, for example. If you want a fuel-efficient car, it's generally a good idea to know the difference between a diesel and a hybrid. But what if it's kind of tough to be an informed consumer? What if the information you need is more difficult to come by, or worse, based on different standards for each vehicle? Well, in that case, you might be a truck shopper. For years, customers of light-duty pickups have had to suffer through different ratings of towing capacities for each brand. For 2015 model year trucks, though, that will no longer be a problem. According to Automotive News, General Motors, Ford and Chrysler Group have announced that starting with next year's models, a common standard will be used to measure towing capacity. The Detroit Three will join Toyota, which adopted the Society of Automotive Engineers' so-called SAE J2807 standards way back in 2011. The standard was originally supposed to be in place for MY2013, but concerns that it would lower the overall stated capacity for trucks led Detroit automakers to pass. Ford originally passed, claiming it'd wait until its new F-150 was launched to adopt the new standards, leading GM and Ram to follow suit. Nissan, meanwhile, has said it will adopt the new standards as its vehicles are updated, meaning the company's next-generation Titan should adhere to the same tow ratings as its competitors. While the adoption of SAE J2807 will be helpful for light-duty customers, those interested in bigger trucks will still be left with differing standards. There is no sign of the new tow standards being adopted for the heavy-duty market.
Why the Detroit Three should merge their engine operations
Tue, Dec 22 2015GM and FCA should consider a smaller merger that could still save them billions of dollars, and maybe lure Ford into the deal. Fiat-Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne would love to see his company merge with General Motors. But GM's board of directors essentially told him to go pound sand. So now what? The boardroom battle started when Mr. Marchionne published a study called Confessions of a Capital Junkie. In it, Sergio detailed the amount of capital the auto industry wastes every year with duplicate investments. And he documented how other industries provide superior returns. He's right, of course. Other industries earn much better returns on their invested capital. And there's a danger that one day the investors will turn their backs on the auto industry and look to other business sectors where they can make more money. But even with powerful arguments Marchionne couldn't convince GM to take over FCA. And while that fight may now be over, GM and FCA should consider a smaller merger that could still save them billions of dollars, and maybe lure Ford into the deal. No doubt this suggestion will send purists into convulsions, but so be it. The Detroit Three should seriously consider merging their powertrain operations, even though that's a sacrilege in an industry that still considers the engine the "heart" of the car. These automakers have built up considerable brand equity in some of their engines. But the vast majority of American car buyers could not tell you what kind of engine they have under the hood. More importantly, most car buyers really don't care what kind of engine or transmission they have as long as it's reliable, durable, and efficient. Combining that production would give the Detroit Three the kind of scale that no one else could match. There are exceptions, of course. Hardcore enthusiasts care deeply about the powertrains in their cars. So do most diesel, plug-in, and hybrid owners. But all of them account for maybe 15 percent of the car-buying public. So that means about 85 percent of car buyers don't care where their engine and transmission came from, just as they don't know or care who supplied the steel, who made the headlamps, or who delivered the seats on a just-in-time basis. It's immaterial to them. And that presents the automakers with an opportunity to achieve a staggering level of manufacturing scale. In the NAFTA market alone, GM, Ford, and FCA will build nearly nine million engines and nine million transmissions this year.
Ford Shelby GT350 Mustang is a track-day weapon with 500 hp
Mon, 17 Nov 2014
Ford promises more than 500 horsepower and a torque peak above 400 lb-ft.
The wait is finally over. After months of spy shots, rumor and innuendo, Ford has officially pulled the wraps off its new Shelby GT350. Judging by the spec sheet and the promises being made - especially that the Shelby GT350 will be "an all-day track car that's also street legal" - the wait appears to have been worth it.