1999 Ford Mustang Gt Coupe - Black - Low Miles - Clean Title - No Reserve on 2040-cars
Erie, Pennsylvania, United States
Fuel Type:GAS
Engine:4.6L 281Cu. In. V8 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Make: Ford
Model: Mustang
Mileage: 55,900
Trim: GT Coupe 2-Door
Sub Model: GT
Exterior Color: Black
Drive Type: RWD
Interior Color: Black
Number of Cylinders: 8
1999 Ford Mustang GT with a clean title
V8 5spd Transmission Rear wheel Drive
Brand New Clutch with one year warranty one month ago (less than 1,000 miles)
2 new Brakes one month ago
New $600 tires (rear are 315's so very wide and muscular) with less than 2,000 miles
PA inspected in June
Only mods to this car are steeda cold air intake, slp loudmouth cat back exhaust that sounds great, and a $300 performance tuner that comes with the car.
This car is in phenomenal mechanical shape. Carfax shows it was driven just 22,000 miles by its first owner in 10 years. It drives straight as an arrow, has zero rust, and shifts as smooth as butter. This car is being sold unfortunately because I am going into the military and will not need it. I love this car and it has always been a head turner. I have taken care of it as have the previous owners from evidence of the great shape the car is in along with receipts of work done. The only flaws on this car are a dent in the drivers side quarter panel that was from the previous owner (barely visible as seen in picture) and I have never got around to getting it fixed as it was just not a priority for a poor college student. Brake dust is also caked on and would take a few hours of scrubbing to remove as I've had success but work over 60hrs a week since graduation. This car is absolutely the cheapest way you can get close to 300 reliable horsepower and over 300ft/lbs of torque. I have used Royal Purple Synthetics and have recently change the transmission fluid, this car is just in awesome shape, and I am disappointed that it has to go. I would prefer a quick sale. Contact me by 814-464-5593 for more details, questions, or to see more pictures.
Ford Mustang for Sale
- 2013 ford mustang convertible premium-race red, leather, super clean, low miles!(US $24,900.00)
- 1988 ford mustang gt convertible 2-door 5.0l(US $6,300.00)
- 1990 ford mustang 5.0 lx notch(US $14,353.00)
- 2006 ford mustang gt eleanor cervini supercharged, pro touring , hot rod, fast(US $22,000.00)
- 1988 saleen mustang mint!
- 1967 ford mustang 1 family owned 289 ci front disc, have all receipts
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
YBJ Auto Sales ★★★★★
West View Auto Body ★★★★★
Wengert`s Automotive ★★★★★
University Collision Center ★★★★★
Ultimate Auto Body Inc ★★★★★
Stewart Collision Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
KBB 2013 Brand Image Awards has some obvious and oddball winners
Sat, 30 Mar 2013The sixth edition of the Kelley Blue Book Brand Image Awards have crowned a wide range of winners - in a couple of cases the recipient of the laurels might say more about KBB users than they do about the actual winner. Compiled from the responses of more than 12,000 shoppers on KBB.com over the past year, there are 13 categories broken into non-luxury, luxury and truck segments "representing the combined wisdom of the American car-buying public."
The award categories have been revamped this year, with some dropping off, some new ones appearing and at least one other given a new term. What isn't surprising is that Honda won Most Trusted Brand for the second year running, Best Value Brand for the third year in a row and took Best Overall Brand, which wasn't on last year's list of awards.
On our own shores, in the non-luxury categories Chrysler got Most Refined Brand and Buick took Best Value Luxury Brand. Neither one of those marques won anything in last year's Brand Image Awards, while Cadillac, which won Best Interior Design Brand and Best Comfort Brand last year - those awards disappeared this year - went home without a single accolade.
Which electric cars can charge at a Tesla Supercharger?
Sun, Jul 9 2023The difference between Tesla charging and non-Tesla charging. Electrify America; Tesla Tesla's advantage has long been its charging technology and Supercharger network. Now, more and more automakers are switching to Tesla's charging tech. But there are a few things non-Tesla drivers need to know about charging at a Tesla station. A lot has hit the news cycle in recent months with regard to electric car drivers and where they can and can't plug in. The key factor in all of that? Whether automakers switched to Tesla's charging standard. More car companies are shifting to Tesla's charging tech in the hopes of boosting their customers' confidence in going electric. Here's what it boils down to: If you currently drive a Tesla, you can keep charging at Tesla charging locations, which use the company's North American Charging Standard (NACS), which has long served it well. The chargers are thinner, more lightweight and easier to wrangle than other brands. If you currently drive a non-Tesla EV, you have to charge at a non-Tesla charging station like that of Electrify America or EVgo — which use the Combined Charging System (CCS) — unless you stumble upon a Tesla charger already equipped with the Magic Dock adapter. For years, CCS tech dominated EVs from everyone but Tesla. Starting next year, if you drive a non-Tesla EV (from the automakers that have announced they'll make the switch), you'll be able to charge at all Supercharger locations with an adapter. And by 2025, EVs from some automakers won't even need an adaptor. Here's how to charge up, depending on which EV you have: Ford 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E. Tim Levin/Insider Ford was the earliest traditional automaker to team up with Tesla for its charging tech. Current Ford EV owners — those driving a Ford electric vehicle already fitted with a CCS port — will be able to use a Tesla-developed adapter to access Tesla Superchargers starting in the spring. That means that, if you own a Mustang Mach-E or Ford F-150 Lightning, you will need the adapter in order to use a Tesla station come 2024. But Ford will equip its future EVs with the NACS port starting in 2025 — eliminating the need for any adapter. Owners of new Ford EVs will be able to pull into a Supercharger station and juice up, no problem. General Motors Cadillac Lyriq. Cadillac GM will also allow its EV drivers to plug into Tesla stations.
Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota
Wed, Feb 25 2015It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study