Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1993 Ford Mustang Gt Hatchback 2-door on 2040-cars

US $2,500.00
Year:1993 Mileage:79890 Color: Blue
Location:

Trenton, New Jersey, United States

Trenton, New Jersey, United States

Email me at : wackerdamiano@yahoo.com

1993 Ford Mustang GT with almost allOriginal paint and all the Original Decals and VIN stickers. Rare color of ReefBlue with Light Grey Ground Effects and Grey interior. This car was built rightand has perfect drivability. The odometer has 79,890 miles on it whichrepresents the chassis. The engine has approximately 1,600 miles on it. Thetransmission is a C-4 built right by Brian Cranston. The Trans was justrefreshed and has a reverse manual valve body with no trans break. It has a PTCconverter with a 4,000 stall and shifts amazing. There is 500 miles on the transsince the rebuild. The Trans has a B&M Shifter and Trans Cooler. The Engine is a363 Dart SHP Race Block with Eagle Stroker kit with Probe Forged AluminumPistons. No expense was spared with the build. 3-core Aluminum radiator withdual electric fans. Car runs 180 degrees. Has air fuel ratio gauge. I have allthe paperwork and receipts for your review. Has Edelbrock Heads with 202 Valves,Trickflow Track Heat Upper and Lower Intakes. ARP Bolts, PMS Andersen Computer.B-303 Cam , 60 lb injectors. Vortech S-Trim with stock 333 pulley- 13lbs ofboost. Trick Flow Fuel Rails. Aeromotive 1,000 fuel pump and fuel pressureregulator. Car was just Dyno-ed on 93 pump gas w/ Alk Meth hooked up and tuned.Max Power = 501.04. Max Torgue = 478.56.No mini-tubs ,tubular K Member Strangesuspension. Built 373 gears w/ Detroit Tru Trac diff, 31 Spline Moser axles, newStrange adjustable shocks and struts. BBK 1 & 5/8 long- tube headers. I just hadthem Jethot coated Powder Black. It has 3" custom X-pipe, to 3" Mufflers are turned down - no tailpipes. 6-point cage with fullinterior, rear seat deleted. Aftermarket Tach and Boost

Auto Services in New Jersey

Yonkers Honda Corp ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 2000 Central Park Ave, Moonachie
Phone: (914) 961-8180

White Dotte ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Radios & Stereo Systems, Consumer Electronics
Address: 2345 Route 206, Westampton
Phone: (609) 267-6610

Vicari Motors Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1117 State Route 12, Baptistown
Phone: (908) 996-4161

Tronix Ii ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Performance, Racing & Sports Car Equipment, Automobile Radios & Stereo Systems
Address: 243 Atlantic City Blvd, Whiting
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Tire Connection & More ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 139 W Landis Ave, Rosenhayn
Phone: (856) 692-9689

Three Star Auto Service Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 153 Prospect Plains Rd, Monroe-Twp
Phone: (609) 655-1122

Auto blog

8 automakers, 15 utilities collaborate on open smart-charging for EVs

Thu, Jul 31 2014

We're going to lead with General Motors here. GM is one of eight automakers working with 15 utilities and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) at developing a "smart" plug-in vehicle charging system. Why did we start with GM? Because it's the first automaker whose press release we read that mentioned the other seven automakers. Points for sharing. For the record, the collaboration also includes BMW, Toyota, Mercedes-Benz, Honda, Chrysler, Mitsubishi and Ford. The utilities include DTE Energy, Duke Energy, Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas & Electric. The idea is to develop a so-called "demand charging" system in which an integrated system lets the plug-ins and utilities communicate with each other so that vehicle charging is cut back at peak hours, when energy is most expensive, and ramped up when the rates drop. Such entities say there's a sense of urgency to develop such a system because the number of plug-in vehicles on US roads totals more than 225,000 today and is climbing steadily. There's a lot of technology involved, obviously, but the goal is to have an open platform that's compatible with virtually any automaker's plug-in vehicle. No timeframe was disclosed for when such a system could go live but you can find a press release from EPRI below. EPRI, Utilities, Auto Manufacturers to Create an Open Grid Integration Platform for Plug-in Electric Vehicles PALO ALTO, Calif. (July 29, 2014) – The Electric Power Research Institute, 8 automakers and 15 utilities are working to develop and demonstrate an open platform that would integrate plug-in electric vehicles (PEV) with smart grid technologies enabling utilities to support PEV charging regardless of location. The platform will allow manufacturers to offer a customer-friendly interface through which PEV drivers can more easily participate in utility PEV programs, such as rates for off-peak or nighttime charging. The portal for the system would be a utility's communications system and an electric vehicle's telematics system. As the electric grid evolves with smarter functionality, electric vehicles can serve as a distributed energy resource to support grid reliability, stability and efficiency. With more than 225,000 plug-in vehicles on U.S. roads -- and their numbers growing -- they are likely to play a significant role in electricity demand side management.

Man turns Ford Fiesta into a one-car band

Mon, 18 Nov 2013

The one-man band is a rather ridiculous idea, drawing up images of one person attempting to manipulate several instruments, at once, in a vain attempt at creating music. It's usually represented by silly scenes like this. Interestingly, the concept isn't much more successful when the "man" in "one-man band" is replaced with "car," as we see in this video.
It seems that someone rigged up and edited (699 times, we might add) a Ford Fiesta, a bucket, 12 PVC pipes and the natural sounds that a car makes to come up with a song. Now, we don't recognize the tune, so we've no idea if this is a cover or an original piece. And while it's hardly Beethoven, we have to admire the amount of effort the "conductor" went to in his attempt to turn a subcompact car into a musical instrument(s). Take a look (or listen) below for the entire video.

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.