1992 Ford Mustang Gt Convertible 2-door 5.0l on 2040-cars
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Engine:5.0L 302Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:Convertible
Fuel Type:GAS
Sub Model: GT
Make: Ford
Exterior Color: Red
Model: Mustang
Interior Color: White
Trim: GT Convertible 2-Door
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Cylinders: 8
Options: Leather Seats, CD Player, Convertible
Safety Features: Driver Airbag
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats, Viper Security System with Remote Start
Mileage: 113,300
I'm selling my 1992 Mustang GT Convertible. The car is very clean. It is rust free except for 2 small spots on the trunk lid. The paint is in good condition, there are a few small chips and dings. The front bumper has some minor damage but it looks like the plastic has not be cracked. The car was partially resprayed by a previous owner. The only parts that weren't resprayed are the passenger door and rear quarter panel. There is a slight shade difference between the old and the new.
The convertible top works and goes up and down perfectly. The top is the original top so the vinyl is cracked at the hinges and the seams at the rear glass window are torn but there are no leaks when you are going down the road in the rain.
The interior is in very good condition. The dash is perfect. The front drivers seat has 2 small tears in the leather. The front passenger seat is in great shape and the back seat shows the normal cracking in the white leather. The carpet is in great shape. The rear passenger side speaker cover is broken.
I have about $2,500.00 in the car in the last year. New equipment includes a new feul pump, new radiator, new cat-back Flowmaster exhaust, and new Firestone Wide Oval tires (there is less than 1000 miles on the tires and I have reciepts for all of the other work). I had my mechanic go through the electrical system so all of the electrics work.
The engine and transmission are virtually unmolested. The only mod to the engine is the addition of an under drive pulley system. The engine is leak free.
This car sounds and runs great!
Payment arrangements will be made with the successful bidder. Shipping arrangements and costs will be the responsibility of the successful bidder.
Ford Mustang for Sale
1991 mustang notchback roller(US $3,500.00)
1997 ford muatang gt decent shape,needs auto. transmission replaced little rust(US $1,900.00)
2003 ford mustang mach 1 low miles no reserve salvage flood title runs great
Ca 1965 mustang 289 convertible ss wheels 2 owner pony int p/s 65 64 66 67 68(US $29,900.00)
1993 ford mustang lx convertible 2-door(US $14,500.00)
2010 ford mustang gt v8 5 speed manual red pirelli tires on 18s
Auto Services in Ohio
Whitesel Body Shop ★★★★★
Walker`s Transmission Service ★★★★★
Uncle Sam`s Auto Center ★★★★★
Trinity Automotive ★★★★★
Trails West Custom Truck 4x4 Super Center ★★★★★
Stone`s Auto Service Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Enterprise working with renter's insurance to cover $47k Mustang stolen from its lot
Sat, 11 Jan 2014There was more than a bit of public indigence following the recent story of Enterprise Rent-A-Car billing a customer $47,000 to replace a Ford Mustang GT Convertible stolen from a Nova Scotia lot. To recap: Kristen Cockerill rented the Mustang for two days, returned it to the lot on a Sunday and left the keys in a secure dropbox only for Enterprise employees to find the car gone the next day.
Despite Enterprise policies stating that customers are responsible for vehicles dropped on off-days, the company has admitted that the situation could've been handled a bit better.
In a recent statement, Enterprise has backed off the big-bill story, and claims to be working with Cockerill and her insurance company to resolve the issue. Further, the Enterprise general manager overseeing Nova Scotia has spoken with the harried renter, and apologized "for the way this claim was handled during the last few months."
Toyota, Ford decide to end hybrid collaboration before it starts
Tue, 23 Jul 2013Not all so-called Memorandum of Understanding pacts end in actual collaborations. For instance, after a two-year "feasibility study," Toyota and Ford have just announced that they will not be developing hybrid systems for use in light trucks and SUVs as previously planned, and the two automakers will instead continue to develop their own hybrid technology independently.
The would-be collaboration was first announced in August of 2011, and would have seen a rear-wheel-drive hybrid platform that would "improve the efficiency of trucks and SUVs while still allowing them to be driven in the way customers expect," according to our initial post on the topic.
Keep in mind that this announcement isn't to say we shouldn't expect hybrid pickups and SUVs from the two automakers, but that they probably aren't coming very soon - Ford says it will have a system "before the end of this decade" and we haven't heard much from Toyota on the hybrid truck front since the 2008 A-BAT Concept (pictured above) - and that they will not share any components between them (and they never have, for what it's worth).
Automakers want to stop the EPA's fuel economy rules change, and why that's a shortsighted move
Tue, Dec 6 2016With a Trump Administration looming, the EPA moved quickly after the election to propose finalizing future fuel economy rules last week. The auto industry doesn't like that (surprise), and has started making moves to stop the EPA. Ford CEO Mark Fields said he wanted to lobby Trump to lower the standards, and now the Auto Alliance, a manufacturer group, is saying it will join the fight against cleaner cars. The Alliance represents 12 automakers: BMW, Fiat Chrysler, Ford, GM, Jaguar Land Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Porsche, Toyota, VW, and Volvo. Gloria Bergquist, a spokesperson for the Alliance, told Automotive News that the "EPA's sudden and controversial move to propose auto regulations eight months early - even after Congress warned agencies about taking such steps while political appointees were packing their bags - calls out for congressional action to pause this rulemaking until a thoughtful policy review can occur." The EPA was going to consider public comments through April 2017, but then said it would move the deadline to the end of December. That means that it can finalize the rules before President Obama leaves office. The director of public affairs for the Consumer Federation of America, Jack Gillis, said on a conference call with reporters last week when the EPA originally announced its decision that it is unlikely that President Trump will be able to roll back these changes. Gillis also said on the same call that any attempt by the automakers to prevent these changes would be history repeating itself. "These are the same companies that fought airbags, and now promoting the fact that every car has multiple airbags," he said. "These are the same companies that fought the crash-test program, and now are promoting the crash-test ratings published by the government. So, it's clear that they're misperceiving the needs of the American consumer." There are more reasons the Allliance's pushback is flawed. Carol Lee Rawn, the transportation program director for Ceres, said on that call that the automotive industry is a global one, and many automakers are moving to global platforms to help them meet strict fuel economy rules around the world.