Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1989 Ford Mustang Gt Convertible 2-door 5.0l on 2040-cars

Year:1989 Mileage:128550 Color: White /
 Gray
Location:

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Convertible
Engine:5.0L 302Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1fabp45e5kf196121 Year: 1989
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: Mustang
Trim: GT Convertible 2-Door
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: RWD
Options: Convertible
Mileage: 128,550
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Sub Model: Gt
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

This mustang runs good and shifts as good too. Does not blow smoke or burn oil. Paint is showing age but shines good. Some chips scratches and marks but no huge dents. New complete tune up with 9 mm wires,msd coil,platinum plugs cap n rotor, brand new bbk h-pipe with cats delete. Magnaflow exhaust. new tires. car is very fast and sounds great! new gas tank and sending unit and fuel pump. recently inspected and title! Crack in lower rear skirt.see pic. Brand new convertible top installed. Interior is in good shape. No rips, looks good see pics. Electric top works. Power windows work but door locks don't. Front Strut towers need replacing due to rusting and rot.  Any other questions please ask. Buyer arranges shipping. No warranty. I reserve the right to sell locally and end auction early. Pay pal or cash only please. Thanks

Auto Services in Rhode Island

State Line Service & Tire Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 1209 Social St, Woonsocket
Phone: (401) 765-0146

Smith Brothers Transmissions ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 191 N Main St, Rockville
Phone: (860) 887-4330

Pride Chrysler-Plymouth ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 11 Taunton Ave, Smithfield
Phone: (508) 336-3580

Miracle Auto Sales ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Car Wash
Address: 580 Reservoir Ave, Cranston
Phone: (401) 461-9424

Lisbon Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 520 Norwich Ave, Hopkinton
Phone: (866) 595-6470

LGEE Auto Collision ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 94 Oxford St, Rumford
Phone: (401) 785-2800

Auto blog

Auto industry insider previews tell-all book, What Did Jesus Drive?

Tue, 11 Nov 2014



"It's about some of the biggest crises in history. It's about who did it right and who did it wrong." - Jason Vines
Jason Vines, the former head of public relations at Chrysler, Ford and Nissan, has seen a lot during his more than 30-year career, and now he's offering a behind-the-scenes look at the auto industry in his tell-all book What Did Jesus Drive? that went on sale this month.

Autoblog Podcast #326

Tue, 26 Mar 2013

Easter Jeep Safari concepts, Shelby 1000, 2014 Cadillac CTS and Mercedes CLA45 AMG leaks
Episode #326 of the Autoblog Podcast is here, and this week, Dan Roth and Zach Bowman talk about this year's Easter Jeep Safari concepts, the 1,200-horsepower Shelby 1000 and leaked images of the 2014 Cadillac CTS and Mercedes-Benz CLA45 AMG. We wrap with your questions and emails, and for those of you who hung with us live on our UStream channel, thanks for taking the time. Keep reading for our Q&A module for you to scroll through and follow along, too. Thanks for listening!
Autoblog Podcast #326:

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.