Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1970 Mustang Convertible M Code 351 Cleveland 4v 1969 on 2040-cars

Year:1970 Mileage:999999 Color: Yellow /
 Black
Location:

Cleveland, Tennessee, United States

Cleveland, Tennessee, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Engine:351 4V
Body Type:Convertible
Vehicle Title:Clear
VIN: 0F03M113676 Year: 1970
Exterior Color: Yellow
Make: Ford
Interior Color: Black
Model: Mustang
Number of Cylinders: 8
Trim: standard
Drive Type: 9 inch
Mileage: 999,999
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"NO ENGINE OR TRANSMISSION AND WILL NEED A FULL RESTORATION. IT DOES HAVE SOME RUST ISSUES."

 I have owned this 1970 Mustang convertible for several years. I have a clear title registered in my name. It is an M code which means it came with a 351 Cleveland 4V engine. The Marti report show all the other features. Ford only put this engine in 535 Mustang convertibles that year. The car will need full floors and both inner rocker panels but both the front and rear frame rails are solid. The rest of the car is solid. It will of course need a full restoration and does not include an engine or transmission. Still has the original 9 inch rear end, disc brakes and power steering. The engine pictured is not included in this auction but it will be available to the winning bidder for an additional price. It was removed from a 1972 R code Mustang fastback. Call (423) 716-1915 with questions and for more information. The car must be picked up in Cleveland, TN.

Auto Services in Tennessee

Warr & Geurin Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange
Address: 2878 Bartlett Rd, Wildwood
Phone: (901) 730-7084

Walker`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 10754 Chapman Hwy, Seymour
Phone: (865) 577-6083

Turon Auto Sales ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 3419 Chapman Hwy, Louisville
Phone: (865) 240-4249

Total Image Paint & Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 5640 Highway 11 E, Huntsville
Phone: (865) 986-0022

Stovall Wrecker Service ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing
Address: Flintville
Phone: (931) 433-1516

Solar Insulation Window Tinting Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Glass Coating & Tinting Materials, Window Tinting
Address: 600 46th Ave N, Nashville
Phone: (615) 208-3458

Auto blog

BMW to follow Honda back into F1?

Mon, 14 Apr 2014

The economic downturn wrought devastating effects on motor racing. Formula One alone lost half its engine suppliers when Honda left at the end of the 2008 season, and both BMW and Toyota followed at the end of 2009. But things are looking up again. Cosworth may have dropped out this season, reducing the engine suppliers to three: Ferrari, Renault and Mercedes, the latter of which admits that it may have left had the engine formula not changed. But Mercedes has stayed and is dominating the championship. Honda is coming back next season. And word around the paddock is it may not be the only one.
According to Giancarlo Minardi - founder of the team now known as Scuderia Toro Rosso - BMW engineers have been conspicuously spotted lately at F1 test sessions and grands prix, lending to speculation that the new engine regulations may entice the Bavarian automaker back into the series. According to Minardi, BMW's marketing division is pushing for the automaker's return to F1, with the board slated to make a decision in May. BMW would be more likely to consider an engine-supply deal rather than taking a team over like it had with Sauber, but with which team or teams it might collaborate remains a big question mark at this point.
As if that's not enough, Ford is said to be considering taking over Cosworth's aborted V6 turbo engine program to take both outfits back into the sport as well. Cosworth supplied F1 engines under the Ford banner for years, but returned under its own name for four seasons from 2010 through 2013 before shuttering its program to develop an engine to meet the new regulations adopted this season.

This Or That: Fiat 500 Abarth vs. Ford Fiesta ST [w/poll]

Thu, 21 Aug 2014



They're pretty darn similar. And yet our views are oh so different.
If you guys could read the transcripts of our editors' chat room, you'd know that we're a pretty argumentative bunch. It's always good-spirited stuff (well, usually), but when we're not obsessively covering this or that, we're usually fighting about one car being better than another. We're all enthusiasts here, and our automotive tastes run the gamut from the weird and unusual to the decidedly mainstream - we all feel strongly about specific cars in a given segment. While it usually makes for good conversation, if we're passionate enough, it can turn into a tomato-throwing showdown.

Ford faces class-action lawsuit for selling vehicles without brake override systems

Fri, 29 Mar 2013

A total of 20 Ford customers are suing the automaker in a class-action lawsuit for selling vehicles "vulnerable to unintended acceleration." According to Reuters, the suit names 30 models built between 2002 and 2010 with electronic throttle control systems but without a brake override system. Those include the 2004-2012 F-Series pickups and the 2005-2009 Lincoln Town Car. Adam Levitt, a partner with the law firm of Grant & Eisenhofer says the plaintiffs in the case want "to be compensated for their economic losses by having overpaid for cars that contained defects." Levitt contends that the plaintiffs would not have bought their vehicles or paid less for them had they known there was no brake override system in place.
Ford began installing brake override systems in its vehicles beginning in 2010. In response to the lawsuit, Ford has pointed to research by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that indicated that unintended acceleration is mostly caused by driver error, saying in a statement that, "NHTSA's work is far more scientific and trustworthy than work done by personal injury lawyers and their paid experts."
Belville et al v. Ford Motor Co. will be heard in US District Court in the Southern District of West Virginia.