Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1968 Mustang Fastback Gt Project Car on 2040-cars

Year:1968 Mileage:999888 Color: Red /
 Black
Location:

Zullinger, Pennsylvania, United States

Zullinger, Pennsylvania, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:FASTBACK
Engine:302
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 8T02J12XXXX Year: 1968
Interior Color: Black
Make: Ford
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Mustang
Trim: fastback
Drive Type: RWD
Sub Model: GT
Mileage: 999,888
Exterior Color: Red
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

here is a gt fastback project car with alot of the hard work done an good winter project.this car was completly sandblasted top to bottom,then had new rear frame peices put in back at the shackles,new trunk floors,tailite panel,quarter skins,both outer wheel housing an one innner,trunk lid an there is a new hood an full one peice floor with the car also .the body work was roughed in an then sealed ten years ago an been sitting since.the engine an trans r numbers maching an did run,i put the drive train back in an been boltn other parts on for easy shipping.there r alot of inside parts missing that i never had with it like lower console an rear inner fiberglass panels wich u can buy repos now but the important gt parts r there like the tach dash an complete wiring harness,i have gathered up other missing parts over the years to make more complete.the bad on the car is it needs a right shock tower an frame rail,the rail is rusted at the back at the floor support an it looks like someone put this tower in with a chain saw way back some time.there r used front fenders with headlight buckets that go with the car an other parts,i will be adding more pics as i dig the parts out an also copy of the marti report.


On Aug-25-13 at 18:10:11 PDT, seller added the following information:

the door glass is still in the doors an do have the rear glass with a new rubber an the front an rear chrome for around the windows. i do have the title to this car an maches all the vin tags.this car had deluxe int with all options but no ac.this car has rear window defrost also.

Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Young`s Auto Body Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 111 S Bolmar St, Mont-Clare
Phone: (610) 431-2053

World Class Transmission Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 2299 State Route 66, Slickville
Phone: (724) 468-1297

Wood`s Locksmithing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Locks & Locksmiths, Keys
Address: Stevensville
Phone: (607) 731-8382

Trust Auto Sales ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1773 W Trindle Rd, Boiling-Springs
Phone: (717) 315-8061

Steele`s Truck & Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Trailers-Repair & Service, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 491 E Church Rd, Zieglerville
Phone: (610) 277-7304

South Hills Lincoln Mercury ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 2760 Washington Rd, Observatory
Phone: (724) 941-1600

Auto blog

2013 North American Car and Truck/Utility of the Year finalists announced [w/poll]

Wed, 12 Dec 2012

2012 is almost in the books and automakers are spending December gearing up for the 2013 auto show season, which tips off next month at the Detroit Auto Show. Traditionally, the latter opens up with the announcement of the North American Car and Truck/Utility of the Year awards, and this year figures to be no different.
But up until this moment, we didn't know which six vehicles would be parked ahead of the stage as finalists, with executives and engineers waiting for the winners to be disclosed. Whittled down from October's "short list" of nominees (11 cars and 10 truck/utility vehicles), the finalists are as follows:
2013 North American Car of the Year:

Uber releases fleet of self-driving vehicles to select few in Pittsburgh

Wed, Sep 14 2016

Starting today, a select group of Uber users in Pittsburgh, PA will have the ability to request a self-driving vehicle. If a self-driving vehicle is in the area, Uber will send it, as well as a safety driver, to drive loyal customers to their destination. The announcement to give customers the opportunity to get a ride in one of Uber's self-driving vehicles comes roughly a year and a half after the company set up its Advanced Technologies Center in the city. On Tuesday, the company offered a few members of the press the opportunity to ride in one of the company's self-driving cars. The fleet, despite Uber's collaboration with Volvo, was comprised of 14 Ford Fusions equipped with a host of self-driving technology, reports TechCrunch. Uber is giving away free rides as a way to obtain real-world testing, which is crucial for self-driving technology. Recently, nuTonomoy beat Uber to the punch by launching the world's first autonomous taxis in Singapore. While the choice to release its self-driving cars in Pittsburgh mainly comes down to the fact that its ATC is located there, the city faces four seasons and its difficult streets that are comprised of bridges, railroad lines, and an irregular grid layout will prove to be a challenge for the autonomous cars. Since the self-driving vehicles are still being tested, the cars will come with two full-time Uber employees. One employee will loosely grasp the car's steering wheel, ready to take over if something goes awry, while the other will monitor the computer's software. As TechCrunch points out, Uber's autonomous vehicles drove in a similar manner to a regular driver. It obeyed traffic laws, mimicked a driver by coming to stops gently and at other times abruptly, as well as driving slightly into another lane to dodge a poorly-parked vehicle, reports TechCrunch. There's no word on whether regular Uber customers will get a ride in one of the company's Fusions or one of the Volvo's that its working on. Automakers and companies alike have been in a race to put autonomous vehicles on the road. Tesla recently updated its Autopilot system, Apple laid off dozens of employees to reboot its self-driving car project, and Google is working giving its autonomous vehicle the ability to detect emergency vehicles. While this is a large step for Uber, vehicles with autonomous capabilities still have a long way to go.

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.