1967 Ford Mustang on 2040-cars
Inverness, Mississippi, United States
If you have more questions or want more details please email : annemarieaoodens@winebuffs.net .
BEST OF SHOW......1967 SHELBY CLONE GT-350 ROADSTER. FRAME OF BUILD 2010. ONE OF A KIND. SHAVED DOOR HANDLES. HAS A
BACK SEAT THAT MATCHES FRONT WHEN TONDAR COVER IS REMOVED. 289 MILD CAM ENGINE WITH SHELBY 4 SPEED. 9 COATS OF
CLEAR COAT. STRIPS PAINTED UNDER CLEAR COAT. STAINLESS STEAL EXHAUST. BEAUTIFUL CAR THAT WILL TURN HEADS WHERE EVER
YOU ARE. I HAVE TO MANY TOYS SO SELLING A FEW OFF. THIS ONE IS AS NEAR PREFECT AS YOU WILL FIND.
Ford Mustang for Sale
- 2007 ford mustang(US $8,500.00)
- 1970 ford mustang(US $11,400.00)
- 1968 ford mustang shelby gt500(US $20,800.00)
- 1967 ford mustang code s(US $17,600.00)
- 2016 ford mustang premium(US $19,400.00)
- 1968 ford mustang 1968 mustang convertible(US $17,000.00)
Auto Services in Mississippi
Weathers Auto Supply Inc ★★★★★
Transmission Center Inc ★★★★★
Ron`s Custom Auto Body Repair ★★★★★
Ray Automotive ★★★★★
Professional Auto Collision Center ★★★★★
Phil Moore Buick GMC ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford and GM link bonus checks to quality scores
Tue, 29 Apr 2014The poor first quarter earnings of Ford and General Motors are having an effect all the way up the food chain. Both automakers struggled with recalls in the first three months of the year, and, according to The Detroit News, they have responded by increasing the percentage of bonuses tied to vehicle quality for salaried workers, including top executives.
GM announced that 25 percent of bonuses (up from 10 percent) for all salaried workers would be tied to its vehicle quality standards. The automaker revealed in its financial report that it spent $1.3 billion on recall-related repairs in the first quarter, and net income was down 86 percent.
Ford also increased the quality proportion of bonuses for about 26,000 salaried workers all the way up to CEO Alan Mulally from 10 percent to 20 percent. The company announced in its report that the amount paid out in warranty and recall claims was about $400 million higher than expected in the first quarter. Its net income fell 39 percent from the previous year. "The change reflects how critical quality is to our overall business," said spokesperson Todd Nissen speaking to Autoblog.
Weekly Recap: Auto execs face life in prison for recall delays under proposed legislation
Sat, 09 Aug 2014
The stiff punishments are part of broader transportation legislation, but clearly McCaskill has automakers in her sights.
Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill threw down the gauntlet this week, proposing a bill that could send auto executives to prison for life if they were found to have delayed a recall. She also wants to eliminate the limit for fines for auto safety violations, which are currently capped at $35 million.
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.