1966 Ford Mustang Convertible 5.0 Coyote V8 Rotisserie Restomod on 2040-cars
Southampton, Massachusetts, United States
Feel free to email: kimberleekqquito@ukwriters.net .
1966 Ford Mustang Convertible Rotisserie Restored Restomod
This car has the superior handling, power, comfort, and reliability of a new car in a meticulously restored
vintage 1966 Mustang Convertible body.
June 2017 completion of documented build including numerous subtle modifications and improvements while
outwardly staying true the original. Underside reinforced with subframe connectors, center floor brace/driveshaft
loop, and custom semi-hidden front cage structure making an incredibly stiff structure while providing for a smooth
ride. Rear wheel wells mini tubbed with 2" wider inner wheel houses. Rear rails narrowed and reinforced for extra
wide rear tire clearance and convertible inner structure has been modified keeping stock appearance. While on
rotisserie underside was refinished to original 1966 Mustang specs; red oxide floor, satin black engine
compartment.
Exterior received extensive fitting of new Dynacorn panels to achieve excellent gaps and fit. 1967 Shelby style
fiberglass hood, GT 350R valance, Shelby side scoops, and GT rear valance were added. Car was block sanded multiple
times before a modified original code "X" vintage burgundy paint was applied. Finished paint has been wet block
sanded flat prior to buffing and polishing to a mirror shine. BASF Glasurit products were used throughout including
high solids clear. All exterior trim, lights, handles, weatherstrips, and bumpers have been replaced with new
better quality or "concours" parts when available. Side mirrors have LED turn signal indicators. All glass has been
replaced; windshield is a Ford Carlite green tint/ blue shade, tinted vent assemblies, tinted door glass, and
tinted quarter glass assemblies. All new so no pits, scratches, or wear.
Front suspension is a Speedway Mustang II IFS with narrowed tubular control arms, dropped spindles, and
adjustable coilovers. Wilwood 12" brakes with drilled & slotted rotors were added along with sway bar and power
steering. Aluminum tandem master cylinder with adjustable proportioning valve and power brake booster have been
frenched into the smoothed firewall for engine clearance.
Rear suspension features a Control Freak triangulated four link with dual adjustable coilover shocks and
adjustable sway bar. A new Currie 9" with performance axle package, 3.50 gear ratio, and a True Trac (gear type)
posi differential were installed. Wilwood rear disc brakes with drilled & slotted rotors and parking brake were
also added
Ford Mustang for Sale
1965 ford mustang(US $20,000.00)
1966 ford mustang(US $23,300.00)
1965 ford mustang fastback(US $20,000.00)
1966 ford mustang k code(US $23,200.00)
1966 ford mustang gt(US $17,000.00)
1967 ford mustang shelby gt350 convertible(US $11,000.00)
Auto Services in Massachusetts
Tire Town Auto Service ★★★★★
Superior Auto Body ★★★★★
Samoset Auto Sevice ★★★★★
Salem Auto Body Company ★★★★★
Salem Auto Body Company ★★★★★
Route 18 Auto Body ★★★★★
Auto blog
2013 Ford Mustang V6
Mon, 10 Jun 2013Secretary Trim, Evolved
There was a time not so long ago when opting for a base Ford Mustang meant getting little more than some sheetmetal, an anemic four-cylinder engine and what may very well have been the world's most disappointing automatic transmission. During the Fox Body years, Ford seemed hell-bent on living up to Carroll Shelby's derogatory description of the coupe as little more than a runabout for demure office assistants, and the result was a base model with fewer sporting intentions than a Dilbert day calendar.
Some 20 years later, hopping behind the wheel of an entry-level pony is an entirely different experience. With all of the menacing aesthetics of the brawnier GT, a well-equipped interior and a drivetrain that toes the line between efficiency and power better than few before it, the 2013 Ford Mustang V6 is an attractive option for buyers in the big coupe market. But is it attractive enough to forgo the beastly GT?
After Years Of Delays, Rear Visibility Requirements Move Closer To Reality
Fri, Jan 3 2014Regulations that would require automakers to improve rear-view visibility on all new cars and light trucks are nearing completion after six years of delays. The U.S. Department of Transportation sent its proposed rear-visibility rules to the Obama administration for review on Christmas Day. The White House Office of Management and Budget now must finalize the regulations. The rule are intended to minimize the risk of pedestrian deaths from vehicles in reverse, a type of accident that disproportionately affects children. Already in 2014, two children have died from cars backing over them, driven in each case by the children's father. Specifics of the Transportation Department's proposal are not available during the review, but the rules are expected to compel automakers to install rear-view cameras as mandatory equipment on all new vehicles. That's what safety advocates have wanted all along. Thought they were pleased the proposed ruling had finally been issued, there was some worry Friday the final rules would omit the rear-view camera mandate. "We're encouraged, but we're also a little concerned about speculation the rear-view camera may not be in there," said Janette Fennell, the president and founder of Kids and Cars, a nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting children in and around vehicles. "I'm wondering where that might be coming from." On Thursday, The Automotive News had reported the possibility the new standards could offer an alternative to rear-view cameras, such as redesigned mirrors, that improved visibility. The Office of Management and Budget typically completes its reviews of new rules in 90 days, although that can be extended. OMB officials said Friday they do not comment on pending rules. The intent of the rules is to enhance rear visibility for drivers and prevent pedestrian deaths. Approximately 200 pedestrians are backed over in the United States each year, according to estimates from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Accidents Mostly Affect Children Roughly half the victims are children younger than age five. A government analysis concluded approximately half the victims -– 95 to 112 -– could be saved with new regulations. Yet the rules have arrived at a glacial pace. President George W. Bush signed legislation that had been passed with bipartisan Congressional support in 2008. But automakers have fought the idea of adding rear-view cameras, saying it is too expensive.
Autoblog's Editors' Picks: Our complete list of the best new vehicles
Mon, May 13 2024It's not easy to earn an “EditorsÂ’ Picks” at Autoblog as part of the rating and review process that every new vehicle goes through. Our editors have been at it a long time, which means weÂ’ve driven and reviewed virtually every new car you can go buy on the dealer lot. There are disagreements, of course, and all vehicles have their strengths and weaknesses, but this list features what we think are the best new vehicles chosen by Autoblog editors. We started this formal review process back in 2018, so there's quite of few of them now. So what does it mean to be an EditorsÂ’ Pick? In short, it means itÂ’s a car that we can highly recommend purchasing. There may be one, multiple, or even zero vehicles in any given segment that we give the green light to. What really matters is that itÂ’s a vehicle that weÂ’d tell a friend or family member to go buy if theyÂ’re considering it, because itÂ’s a very good car. The best way to use this list is is with the navigation links below. Click on a segment, and you'll quickly arrive at the top rated pickup truck or SUV, for example. Use the back button to return to these links and search in another segment, like sedans. If youÂ’ve been keeping up with our monthly series of the latest vehicles to earn EditorsÂ’ Pick status, youÂ’re likely going to be familiar with this list already. If not, welcome to the complete list that weÂ’ll be keeping updated as vehicles enter (and others perhaps exit) the good graces of our editorial team. We rate a new car — giving it a numerical score out of 10 — every time thereÂ’s a significant refresh or if it happens to be an all-new model. Any given vehicle may be impressive on a first drive, but we wait until itÂ’s in the hands of our editors to put it through the same type of testing as every other vehicle that rolls through our test fleet before giving it the EditorsÂ’ Pick badge. This ensures consistency and allows more voices to be heard on each individual model. And just so you donÂ’t think weÂ’ve skipped trims or variants of a model, we hand out the EditorsÂ’ Pick based on the overarching model to keep things consistent. So, when you read that the 3 Series is an EditorsÂ’ Pick, yes, that includes the 330i to the M3 and all the variants in between. If thereÂ’s a particular version of that car we vehemently disagree with, we make sure to call that out.
