Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1966 Ford Mustang Candy Apple Red Color Code "t" on 2040-cars

Year:1966 Mileage:83060 Color: Candy Apple Red /
 Black
Location:

Mount Kisco, New York, United States

Mount Kisco, New York, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:2dsd
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:6cyl
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 6T07T275631 Year: 1966
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Ford
Model: Mustang
Trim: coupe
Drive Type: Manual 3 Spd on the floor
Mileage: 83,060
Number of Doors: 2
Exterior Color: Candy Apple Red
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Black
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Im selling a beautiful 1966 Candy Apple Red Ford Mustang.This is an autobody shop owners sons car. The body was restored last summer. It has new Quarter panels. New front fenders. New front and rear bumpers. New front and rear valances.It has new reupholsted front seats and the back seat is in excellent condition. The Reverse lights are new. New Emblems. New front and rear windshield moldings. New Carpeting. NewTrunk lid. New Gas cap. New front door Trims, (both sides). The frame is solid as well. The floors do have some patch welds from the previous owner.  All body work was professionally done by Simone Bros. Autobody est. 1975. It also has had a tune-up, fluids changed and carbureter rebuilt. It runs and drives great. This car is really nice and the pictures dont do the paintjob justice. It has very little left to be done to make this car a show car. There is a tear in the headliner and there is no working radio at the moment. This is a non A.C. car. The heat works as does all the lghts in the car. It does pass N.Y.S.I. The tires are fairly new as well. Please bid with confidence and bid to own this fine collector car.The reserve is low on this vehicle. If you have anyquestions please call 914 434 0098. Thanks and Good luck.

Auto Services in New York

Zona Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 259 Lee Rd, West-Henrietta
Phone: (585) 458-8759

Zima Tire Supply ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Recap, Retread & Repair
Address: 213 Montauk Hwy, Bellport
Phone: (631) 325-0740

Worlds Best Auto, Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Financial Services, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 1020 Utica Ave, Staten-Island
Phone: (718) 928-7741

Vip Honda ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 765 US Highway 22, Staten-Island
Phone: (908) 226-9090

VIP Auto Group ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Tire Dealers
Address: 1664 Hylan Blvd, Huguenot
Phone: (718) 477-7888

Village Line Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 67A Albany Ave, Wading-River
Phone: (631) 842-7777

Auto blog

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.

Ford dissects the heart of the 2015 Mustang, its engine range

Thu, 05 Dec 2013

Happy Mustang Day. Are you tired of hearing about the 2015 Ford Mustang yet? No? Good, here's a bunch of mechanical data on Ford's sixth-gen muscle car, along with cutaways of the GT's 5.0-liter V8 and the new 2.3-liter, EcoBoost four-cylinder shown above. We also have a smattering of info on the Stang's updated transmissions and an exploded-parts-diagram view of its all-new independent rear suspension.
Ford is set to make waves offering the Mustang with a turbo for the firs time since the small-volume SVO of the 1980s. Displacing 2.3 liters, the engine's twin-scroll turbo should help the four-cylinder turn out a projected 305 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque, while also returning the best fuel economy in the Mustang's engine lineup. As we said in our Deep Dive, the EcoBoost will be slotted in as a premium engine, above the 3.7-liter V6 but below the 5.0-liter V8.
Speaking of that high-revving eight-cylinder, it's receiving a new cylinder head with high-flow ports. The intake and exhaust valves are larger and the cams have been replaced, among other tweaks. It should rev even higher thanks to a rebalanced crankshaft and forged connecting rods. Ford is still claiming a projected 420 hp and 390 lb-ft, although as many of the changes for the 2015's V8 come from the 2013 Boss 302, we're going to assume there's some sandbagging at work.

Ford Focus ST diesel estate in track showdown with Focus ST hatch

Sun, Jan 18 2015

Diesel hot hatches are still a concept that's gaining ground. Obviously, there are none for sale in the US, but European buyers have the choice of at least the Volkswagen Golf GTD and Ford Focus ST Diesel. What better way to find out how the new, high-performance oil-burner really stacks up than for Ford to stage a race against the gasoline-fueled Focus ST? On paper, the ST Diesel is at a big performance detriment here. Its 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder makes 182 horsepower and 295 pound-feet of torque compared to 247 hp and 266 lb-ft for the gas version in this race. However while not a factor for this race, the oil-burner does offer better fuel economy and produces less CO2, which makes a difference for European buyers. Ford skews the race results by giving the ST Diesel Estate a two-second head start for this one-lap battle around the Castle Combe Circuit. Also, this is a video from the Blue Oval, which is going to further minimize the appearance of weakness for its vehicles. Still, both STs really get to show off their strengths, and it's worth seeing how the sibling rivalry shakes out at the finish line.