1965 Ford Mustang K-code Convertible on 2040-cars
Proctorville, Ohio, United States
Please email me with any questions or requests for additional pics or something specific at: rubyrddrobot@f1fans.net .
This is not just another ‘60s Pony car; it is powered by the now legendary K-Code 289 cubic-inch V8 also known as the High Performance or HiPo Mustang, and the durable Ford 4-speed Toploader transmission. This Mustang is a classic that was very well-maintained and cared for with only two owners over the past 30 years.
The 1965-1967 “K” cars were the FIRST high performance Mustangs. These were cars that Ford dropped the 289 HiPo engine into. They were special because they were more than a hot engine in a good looking car. These cars came standard with heavy duty suspension, a nine-inch rear end, and many other performance modifications. More often than not, these HiPo Mustangs were seen driven to work during the week, and raced on the weekends. This helps explain the rarity and low survival rate of this car today. The original Ford power train warranty on HiPo’s came with was 90 days or 4000 miles, whichever came first. Additionally, the warranty was voided if the vehicle participated in any “competitive activities”. Today, these cars are not common, and in some combinations can be quite rare. Convertibles are much rarer than the usual coupe or fastback body style.
Ford Mustang for Sale
- 2007 ford mustang(US $24,700.00)
- 1965 ford mustang(US $22,700.00)
- Mustang lx procharger supercharger(US $16,000.00)
- 1969 ford mustang mach 1(US $26,000.00)
- 1969 ford mustang mach 1(US $23,400.00)
- 2011 ford mustang shelby gt500 svt(US $24,700.00)
Auto Services in Ohio
Westside Auto Service ★★★★★
Van`s Tire ★★★★★
Used 2 B New ★★★★★
T D Performance ★★★★★
T & J`s Auto Body & Collision ★★★★★
Skipco Financial ★★★★★
Auto blog
Detroit Three autoworkers could get huge bonuses
Mon, 06 Jan 2014For a long time, being a line worker for one of the Detroit Three has meant living with an uncertain future. With the health of American automakers on the rise, though, things are also starting to look up for the men and women building the cars. The latest sign that things aren't bad? Big profit-sharing checks.
According to The Detroit News, Ford, General Motors and Chrysler could end up paying over $800 million to 130,000 workers as part of a profit-sharing plan. According to The News, the economic impact of these profits in Michigan alone could exceed $400 million, besting the NFL's Super Bowl, MLB's All-Star Game and the NHL's Winter Classic for their economic impact.
This is the third straight year the Detroit Three have issued profit-sharing checks to UAW employees, and for many workers, the checks are as close as they'll get to a raise, due to the most recent contract between the union and the manufacturers. On average, employees at GM and Ford receive $1 for every $1 million in North American (not just the US) pre-tax profits. Chrysler, meanwhile, gets a similar deal, although the Auburn Hills-based company calculates profit sharing using 85 percent of the brand's global profits.
Ford recalls 434k vehicles for several unrelated issues
Mon, 07 Apr 2014It seems that the hard winter in much of the country has been as rough on some Fords as it has on many people. The Blue Oval is recalling roughly 434,000 vehicles in two separate recalls, and one of them partially caused by the salt used to melt the snow on roads.
The first recall covers 385,750 2001-2004 Escape models in the Midwest, Northeast and Canada because a subframe could rust and eventually fail. This is partially due to the road salt used in those areas, and about 349,000 of the affected vehicles are in the US. To remedy the problem, dealers are installing a reinforcement cross brace on the frame to strengthen them. There has been one crash caused by the failure but no injuries. According to The Detroit News, this is not the first rust-related recall for Ford. It estimates the company has repaired over two million vehicles since 2010 for problems on vehicles related to the iron oxide, including the rear wheel wells of the Freestar minivan.
The second recall covers 48,950 2013-2014 Ford Fusion, Escape, C-MAX and Lincoln MKZ models because welds in their seatbacks don't meet National Highway Traffic Safety Administration standards. The fault affects the front seats, and the sub-standard welds joining the setback to the recliner could increase the chance on injury. There have been no reported injuries or accidents caused by the problem, but there are 42,972 affected vehicles in the US and 4,744 in Canada.
Experts wonder if aluminum F-150 gives Ford a real advantage
Mon, 17 Mar 2014There's no doubt that Ford is taking a risk in producing the body of its upcoming new F-150 pickup truck in aluminum. What is up for debate, however, is whether aluminum was a wise risk to take in the first place. Wards Auto took the opportunity to poll some experts on the subject of aluminum versus steel in the automotive sector, with somewhat unsurprising results.
Richard Schultz, a project consultant at Ducker Worldwide, which bills itself as "a leading aluminum industry consultant (though they also deal in steels), suggests that the potential drawbacks to aluminum - higher costs, lower supply - aren't really impediments to the auto industry's increased acceptance of the lightweight metal.
Similarly, Randall Scheps, global automotive marketing director for Alcoa, a massive aluminum producer, counters claims that aluminum is less safe for vehicle occupants, suggesting that the use of aluminum can actually increase safety as it could potentially allow for larger vehicles with more crush space than steel.