Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1927 Ford Track T Fiberglass Rat Rod Street Rod Hot Rod 32 Old School on 2040-cars

US $6,500.00
Year:1927 Mileage:0
Location:

Searcy, Arkansas, United States

Searcy, Arkansas, United States
Advertising:

1927 ford glass body frame  wide whites are brand new windshield is installed fuel line run and brake line run under car doesnt need much to finish buy it now and save money new superbell axle and brake kit all new steering will sell with or with out motor and trans $ 500 cheaper without motor and trans motor is 305 and trans is 350 turbo motor has new cam and lifters timing chain not a fresh motor or trans just something to get it going with.
take a look and give me a call we have built a bunch of these cars they drive good and are fun  for more info call 501 278 7224  comes with bill of sale and a vin plate

Auto Services in Arkansas

Williams Terry Auto Sales ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 512 N College Ave, Norphlet
Phone: (870) 862-6761

The Car Connection ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 5404 S University Ave, Cammack-Village
Phone: (501) 565-7155

Southern Electronics ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Speedometers, Automobile Radios & Stereo Systems
Address: Bearden
Phone: (804) 423-1055

Russell Chevrolet ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: Salem
Phone: (501) 835-8300

River City Radiator Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Radiators-Repairing & Rebuilding, Radiators Automotive Sales & Service
Address: 1801 E 23rd St, College-Station
Phone: (501) 907-7478

Paul Miller Motors Inc ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 1506 E Main St, Sage
Phone: (888) 379-3192

Auto blog

Ford bringing C-Max Solar Energi Concept to CES

Thu, 02 Jan 2014

Solar energy might not be enough to power a usable electric vehicle on its own, but that doesn't mean it can't lend a helping hand. And that's what Ford has in store for the Consumer Electronics Show opening next week in Las Vegas.
Ford has essentially taken its C-Max Energi plug-in hybrid and fitted it with the latest in solar panel technology developed by SunPower, acting like a magnifying glass to capture as much of the sun's energy as possible. So you get the benefit of an electric vehicle, with the range assurance of a hybrid, without needing to draw from the grid.
Ford estimates that a day of charging in the sunshine will give the C-Max Solar Energi concept the same full charge as the production PHEV, with a total range of 620 miles - 21 of which can be run on electric power alone. Otherwise the vehicle - which remains a concept for the time being - is identical to the existing C-Max Energi. The top-selling model in Ford's growing hybrid and electric vehicle portfolio helps put Ford just behind Toyota among the top seller of hybrids in America. Scope out the images in the gallery above and the video clip and press release below for a closer look.

Ford recalling nearly 700k Escape CUVs, C-Max hybrids over two separate safety issues

Fri, 09 May 2014

Poor Escape. Ever since its launch in 2012, Ford's small CUV has been the subject of many, many, many recalls. And today, The Detroit News is reporting that Ford is adding two more recalls to the 2013-14 model year Escape's permanent record, one of them also involves the C-Max hybrid hatchback.
The first recall, covering 692,500 Escape and C-Max vehicles, is due to a software glitch that could cause the airbags - specifically, the safety canopy - to not deploy in a timely fashion during rollover crashes. According to the News, Ford says no crashes or injuries have been reported in relation to this problem.
The second recall, covering 692,700 Escapes, is related to the door handles. The News reports that the exterior door handles could open while the vehicle is in motion, and could also fail to latch properly. Once again, no crashes or injuries have occurred because of this. The National Highway Safety Traffic Administration has not issued an official notice on either recall as of this writing.

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.