1930 Model A Roadster Street Rod Hot Rod Henry Steel on 2040-cars
Shawnee, Oklahoma, United States
Body Type:ROADSTER
Engine:350 CHEVY
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: Model A
Trim: TAN AND RED
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: AUTOMATIC
Options: CD Player, Convertible
Mileage: 100
Sub Model: ROADSTER
Exterior Color: VICTORY RED
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: BUCKSKIN
THIS CAR IS A GREAT DRIVER AND OR SHOW CAR!!!
IT IS A STEEL BODY HENRY CAR
CAR FEATURES A 1957 CHEVY DASH MOLDED INTO THE BODY WITH A CHEVY TILT STEERING COLUMN.
ALSO HAS SUICIDE DOORS W/BEAR CLAW LATCHES
HAS STEREO SYSTE
MR GOODWRENCH CRATE MOTOR
REBUILT 700 R 4 TRANSMISSION AND A CHEVY REAREND POSEI
DECK LID IS STILL AT UPHOLSTRY SHOP WILL BE BACK TUESDAY
EVERYTHING ON THE FRAME AND MECHANICAL IS ALL NEW
THE RECEIPTS WILL GO WITH THE CAR
CAR HAS CLEAR OKLAHOMA TITLE
I COULD WRITE ALL DAY ABOUT THIS CAR BUT THE CAR SPEAKS FOR IT'S SELF
DRIVE THIS CAR WITH CONFIDENCE AND GO ANYWHERE YOU WANT TO GO
ANY QUESTIONS CALL #405-264-6171
Ford Model A for Sale
1931 ford model a,rat rod,hot rod
1928 ford model a rat rod(US $11,000.00)
1929 ford t-bucket rat rod hot rod 327 v8 automatic 350 trani ((no reserve))(US $18,500.00)
1929 model a tudor sedan ready for restore hotrod ratrod(US $7,000.00)
1931 ford model a(US $26,300.00)
1929 ford model a roadster/streetrod
Auto Services in Oklahoma
Robert`s Auto Service ★★★★★
Regal Car Sales and Credit ★★★★★
Precision Auto Body ★★★★★
Pit Stop ★★★★★
Oklahoma Upholstery Supply Inc ★★★★★
NAPA Auto Parts ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid
Tue, Jun 17 2014It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.
NHTSA advances investigation of Ford Crown Victoria headlights
Sat, Aug 15 2015The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is opening a preliminary evaluation into reports of suddenly failing headlights on 517,945 examples of the 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis. The government started looking into this problem in April when the North Carolina Consumers Council filed a defect petition with the agency. Now, the inquiry has moved to the next step. According to NHTSA's documentation (as a PDF), it examined its own database and worked with Ford to come up with a total of 3,609 complaints of the front lighting control module suddenly failing. When this happens, drivers lose the low-beam headlights, but the high-beams can be used by holding the stalk. Sometimes turning the switch off and on fixes the issue. Additionally, there are 15 allegations of crashes, and one reported shoulder injury. NHTSA's preliminary evaluations "evaluate the scope, frequency, and consequence of the alleged defect" and don't necessarily lead to a recall. NHTSA looked into this problem once before in 2008 and 2009 and decided that a recall wasn't necessary. Ford also extended the warranty on the front lighting control module for these vehicles. INVESTIGATION Subject : Loss of headlights Date Investigation Opened: AUG 10, 2015 Date Investigation Closed: Open NHTSA Action Number: PE15028 Component(s): EXTERIOR LIGHTING All Products Associated with this Investigation Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s) FORD CROWN VICTORIA 2003-2005 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS 2003-2005 Details Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company SUMMARY: After receiving a defect petition (DP15002) concerning the loss of headlights and other exterior lighting in model year (MY) 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis vehicles, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) analyzed Vehicle Owner Questionnaire (VOQ) complaints received from consumers and identified a total of 605 reports (for all submission dates) alleging headlight failure. The complaints indicate failures of both low beam headlights typically while driving, a defect condition that was evaluated under a prior ODI investigation (PE08066). Most consumer VOQs indicate that the headlights failed suddenly and without warning leaving the driver with no forward lighting, however some report the headlights flickered or dimmed prior to turning off. In some cases drivers were able to turn the headlights back on after a period of time while others reported the headlights would not come back on at all.
GM also sheds parts from its pickups to boost payload ratings
Thu, 31 Jul 2014The row between Ford and Ram over who boasts the best-in-class tow rating for heavy duty pickups has revealed a number of things. Chief among them is a report that Ford removes items like the spare tire, jack, radio and center console from its vehicles in a bid to lower its base curb weight and therefore keep the truck's gross vehicle weight rating down.
For those that need a refresher, GVWR is the vehicle's curb weight plus its maximum payload. A lower GVWR allows Ford to station its F-450 among the so-called Class III pickups, despite the fact that internally, it has the makings of a more brutish Class IV truck.
Ford explains away these deletions, saying a customer could order their vehicle in such a manner. It has also come to light that Ford is not the only automaker to engage in such practices.