Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1962 Galaxie 500xl Hardtop, 1 Of 1, 406 Tri Power With Automatic Trans! Rare! on 2040-cars

Year:1962 Mileage:487 Color: White /
 Gold
Location:

Fenton, Missouri, United States

Fenton, Missouri, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Engine:406 TRI POWER
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Dealer
VIN: 2J67G158180 Year: 1962
Exterior Color: White
Make: Ford
Interior Color: Gold
Model: Galaxie
Number of Cylinders: 8
Trim: HARDTOP
Drive Type: CRUISE-O-MATIC
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Mileage: 487
Sub Model: TRI POWER
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in Missouri

West 60 Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 301 W Glenwood St, Fordland
Phone: (417) 889-2886

Wes Jerde Performance Center ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile Performance, Racing & Sports Car Equipment, Auto Racing
Address: 11320 Hickman Mills Dr, Lake-Winnebago
Phone: (816) 461-4017

Waterloo Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Diagnostic Service
Address: 622 N Market St, Sulphur-Springs
Phone: (618) 937-8438

The Dent Devil of St Louis ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Windshield Repair
Address: 14949 Manchester Road, Twin-Oaks
Phone: (636) 230-7900

Springfield Yamaha ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Motorcycle Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 5183 E Kearney St, Willard
Phone: (417) 862-4343

Spectrum Glass Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Windows
Address: Richwoods
Phone: (636) 614-0267

Auto blog

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

Ford, GM still doing new business with Takata amidst airbag crisis

Thu, Nov 20 2014

Lengthy vehicle development times make it difficult for automakers to cut and run from the supplier. You might expect automakers to be fleeing any connection with beleaguered supplier Takata in the wake of the company's exploding airbag inflator crisis. After all, with a Senate hearing, pending lawsuit, plummeting stock value and demand for a national recall, the tier-one supplier isn't at its strongest right now. However, years of cooperation mean that automakers are standing by Takata, and necessity may be playing a role, as well. About 39 percent of Takata's business comes from airbags, and seatbelts make up another significant chunk of the operation too, says Bloomberg. The long-term relationships and lengthy vehicle development times make it difficult for automakers to cut and run from the supplier. "Takata has so much product breadth that I don't really see that they could just disappear," said AutoPacific analyst Dave Sullivan to Bloomberg. For example, Takata helped develop the unique front center airbag with General Motors in models like the Chevrolet Traverse and Buick Enclave. Outside of safety tech, it is also a partner with Ford on the adaptive steering system available on the upcoming 2015 Edge. These long-lasting partnerships make change difficult now that there's a problem. According to Reuters, automakers claim it would take a year or longer to set up with a different supplier for replacement airbag inflators. Switching to a completely different part for the repairs might not be a viable option either, because of the engineering time needed. BMW is taking action, though. According to Reuters, the Bavarian brand is working with the supplier to move inflator production from Monclova, Mexico, to a Takata factory in Freiburg, Germany. The Mexican plant may be the source of some of the faulty parts. News Source: Bloomberg, ReutersImage Credit: Jens Meyer / AP Photo BMW Ford GM Safety Takata airbag recall

Ford board pushing Mulally for decision amidst fears story is drowning out other news

Thu, 12 Dec 2013

Automakers and their executives rarely like to divulge information regarding future goings on, but the board of directors at Ford sound like they're getting a little antsy about chief executive officer Alan Mulally and his plans for 2014.
According to Reuters, as news of Mulally's possible departure to Microsoft continues to swirl, Ford's board is looking to push the affable executive to make a decision about his future sooner rather than later. Apparently, the board is growing concerned that this will-he/won't-he drama may end up distracting the media from covering Ford's other big news events next year - items like the debut of key all-new products like the Mustang and F-150.
So far, the picture for Mulally's eventual successor remains fuzzy, but it's understood that the leading candidate remains the company's chief operating officer, Mark Fields. Just recently, we heard that Mulally will stay until the end of 2014, but a few months ago, Ford seemed open to the idea of him stepping down earlier than that.