Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Ford Fusion Se Sedan 4-door 2.5l on 2040-cars

US $14,000.00
Year:2014 Mileage:1378
Location:

Dearborn Heights, Michigan, United States

Dearborn Heights, Michigan, United States

Get behind the wheel of the SHARP, like NEW, 2014 Fusion! 

It is SMOOTH efficient on gas and pleasantly enjoyable to drive! 

This BEAUTIFUL Fusion has only 1338 miles and has barely been driven. It also still has that brand NEW car smell! 

Interior is charcoal black and is SPIC SPAN condition! Smoke free interior.  

This 2014 Fusion has power seats, power locks, and cruise control! 

Vehicle has undergone a state inspection and was issued a rebuilt title which is as good as a clear title. 
Reason for rebuilt title: Replaced back bumper, trunk lid, tail lights, and repaired quarter panel. (Cosmetic parts only) Blended paint to ensure perfect match. 
Car now looks and drives like NEW!

If you have any questions, please contact (313) 969-5643


Auto Services in Michigan

Winners Auto Service Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 20 12th St N, Richland
Phone: (269) 965-6083

Wally`s Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 05879 Blue Star Memorial Hwy, Covert
Phone: (269) 637-1800

Vehicle Accessories ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Snow Removal Service
Address: Rochester-Hills
Phone: (866) 820-2119

Vanderhaag Car Sales ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Car Rental
Address: 1680 W US Highway 10 31, Ludington
Phone: (231) 757-2727

Used Car Factory Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 639 W Blue Star Dr, Kingsley
Phone: (231) 943-2277

University Auto Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Tire Recap, Retread & Repair
Address: 3900 Cass Ave, Hazel-Park
Phone: (313) 831-1111

Auto blog

Ford Fiesta ST orders off to strong start

Fri, 17 May 2013

We at Autoblog love the new little Ford Fiesta ST, and apparently, folks in Europe are pretty impressed with it, as well. According to Ford, the automaker's European arm has already logged 3,000 orders for the new hot hatch since it hit dealerships this March. The US-spec car, which will only be available as a five-door, will go on sale in the United States this summer.
What's perhaps most interesting about the Fiesta ST ordering is that the majority of customers appear to be ordering high-spec cars. According to Ford data, 60 percent of customers have opted for the leather interior with Recaro buckets, and 90 percent have selected the upgraded 17-inch wheels (seen on our test car, above). Spirit Blue has been the most popular color, commanding 27 percent of all orders. As for the technology upgrades, 19 percent of customers have ponied up for the Sony stereo with navigation.
To recap, the Fiesta ST is offered with Ford's 1.6-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder engine, putting out 179 horsepower and 177 pound-feet of torque, mated exclusively to a six-speed manual transmission. We had an absolute blast flinging the hot Fiesta through the French Alps, and we can't wait for this sharp little hatch to make its way over to the States.

Big electric trucks won't save the planet, says the NYT

Tue, Feb 21 2023

When The New York Times decides that an issue is an issue, be prepared to read about it at length. Rarely will a week passes these days when the esteemed news organization doesn’t examine the realities, myths and alleged benefits and drawbacks of electric vehicles, and even The Atlantic joins in sometimes. That revolution, marked by changes in manufacturing, consumer habits and social “consciousness,” may in fact be upon us. Or it may not. Nonetheless, the newspaper appears committed to presenting to the public these pros and cons. In this recently published article titled, “Just How Good for the Planet Is That Big Electric Pickup Truck?”—wow, thatÂ’s a mouthful — the Times focuses on the “bigness” of the current and pending crop of EVs, and how that impacts or will impact the environment and road safety. This is not what news organizations these days are fond of calling “breaking news.” In October, we pointed to an essay in The Atlantic that covered pretty much the same ground, and focused on the Hummer as one particular villain, In the paper and online on Feb. 18, the Times' Elana Shao observes how “swapping a gas pickup truck for a similar electric one can produce significant emissions savings.” She goes on: “Take the Ford F-150 pickup truck compared with the electric F-150 Lightning. The electric versions are responsible for up to 50 percent less greenhouse gas emissions per mile.” But she right away flips the argument, noting the heavier electric pickup trucks “often require bigger batteries and more electricity to charge, so they end up being responsible for more emissions than other smaller EVs. Taking into consideration the life cycle emissions per mile, they end up just as polluting as some smaller gas-burning cars.” Certainly, itÂ’s been drummed into our heads that electric cars donÂ’t run on air and water but on electricity that costs money, and that the public will be dealing with “the shift toward electric SUVs, pickup trucks and crossover vehicles, with some analysts estimating that SUVs, pickup trucks and vans could make up 78 percent of vehicle sales by 2025." No-brainer alert: Big vehicles cost more to charge. And then thereÂ’s the safety question, which was cogently addressed in the Atlantic story. Here Shao reiterates data documenting the increased risks of injuries and deaths caused by larger, heavier vehicles.

Automakers want to stop the EPA's fuel economy rules change, and why that's a shortsighted move

Tue, Dec 6 2016

With a Trump Administration looming, the EPA moved quickly after the election to propose finalizing future fuel economy rules last week. The auto industry doesn't like that (surprise), and has started making moves to stop the EPA. Ford CEO Mark Fields said he wanted to lobby Trump to lower the standards, and now the Auto Alliance, a manufacturer group, is saying it will join the fight against cleaner cars. The Alliance represents 12 automakers: BMW, Fiat Chrysler, Ford, GM, Jaguar Land Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Porsche, Toyota, VW, and Volvo. Gloria Bergquist, a spokesperson for the Alliance, told Automotive News that the "EPA's sudden and controversial move to propose auto regulations eight months early - even after Congress warned agencies about taking such steps while political appointees were packing their bags - calls out for congressional action to pause this rulemaking until a thoughtful policy review can occur." The EPA was going to consider public comments through April 2017, but then said it would move the deadline to the end of December. That means that it can finalize the rules before President Obama leaves office. The director of public affairs for the Consumer Federation of America, Jack Gillis, said on a conference call with reporters last week when the EPA originally announced its decision that it is unlikely that President Trump will be able to roll back these changes. Gillis also said on the same call that any attempt by the automakers to prevent these changes would be history repeating itself. "These are the same companies that fought airbags, and now promoting the fact that every car has multiple airbags," he said. "These are the same companies that fought the crash-test program, and now are promoting the crash-test ratings published by the government. So, it's clear that they're misperceiving the needs of the American consumer." There are more reasons the Allliance's pushback is flawed. Carol Lee Rawn, the transportation program director for Ceres, said on that call that the automotive industry is a global one, and many automakers are moving to global platforms to help them meet strict fuel economy rules around the world.