Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2013 Ford Fusion 4dr Sdn Titanium Awd on 2040-cars

US $26,972.00
Year:2013 Mileage:17042
Location:

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Auto Services in Colorado

Volvo Specialists Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 36 S Santa Fe Dr, Cherry-Hills-Village
Phone: (303) 722-8658

The 4Wheeler ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 6519 Arapahoe #2, Hygiene
Phone: (303) 835-9200

Spec-Wheels of America ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheels, Automobile Accessories
Address: 5850 E 58th Ave # A, Dupont
Phone: (303) 853-9978

Six Stars Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6989 S Jordan Rd Ste 3L, Centennial
Phone: (720) 870-2611

Simpson Brothers Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Towing
Address: 2510 Weslo Ave, Whitewater
Phone: (970) 986-4938

Santos Muffler Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 1225 Federal Blvd, Columbine-Valley
Phone: (303) 972-3800

Auto blog

Spy shooter claims proof of upcoming aluminum Ford F-Series Super Duty

Thu, 26 Jun 2014

Ford has already confirmed that the 2015 F-150 (pictured above) was just the beginning for its more extensive use of aluminum. CEO Alan Mulally said it himself during the 2014 Detroit Auto Show. We've even already seen the future Raptor testing with an aluminum body. But a recent discovery from an intrepid spy photographer might indicate that the lightweight metal is coming to the Blue Oval's Super Duty pickups in their upcoming generation, as well.
According to Automotive News, a spy shooter in Colorado spotted a prototype for the next-gen F-350 testing. He happened to have a magnet on hand and got close enough to check the truck out. When he held it up to the metal in the bed, it didn't stick, which signaled to him a switch from steel to aluminum.
Obviously, this claim raises some questions. Given that it was a test vehicle, one possibility is that the Blue Oval is just evaluating the feasibility of switching to aluminum for the Super Duty trucks, not necessarily committed to it yet. Ford has been testing it quite exhaustively, after all. In fact, much of the rest of the truck in question was covered in camouflage, so it's possible that the magnet failed to work along the rest of the body not because it was aluminum, but because it wasn't powerful enough to get through the disguising material. Thus, the lightweight metal's use could be far less substantial than on the new F-150. Still, it was a clever idea for the cameraman to check things out and might have given us the first hint about brand's next heavy-duty models.

Top torque-to-weight ratios under $100k, $50k and $25k

Tue, 07 Oct 2014

Horsepower may steal a lot of headlines, but the always-more-complex torque figure is often a critical one for both the workingman and the motoring playboy. The measure of rotational force represents the twist that can liquefy one's tires or haul one's horse trailer. Good stuff.
It follows then, that as with the horsepower-to-weight list that we assembled for you a few months ago, a list of cars that offer the most pound-feet with the fewest pounds to carry, is an interesting one to break down. Sure, there's a big difference in how the torque is applied from a turbocharged six-cylinder in a Swedish luxury sedan and a massive heavy-duty truck's turbo-diesel. But being the car/stat geeks that we are, we think it's kinda neat that those two vehicles rank near each other where torque and weight intersect.
As with the horsepower list, we've given you figures as pounds per every one pound-foot. Again broken down into broad price categories, we've got a mixed bag of 2014 and 2015 models here, too. Every effort has been made to select the most up-to-date prices and specs, and we've also to omitted some '14 cars that won't be re-upped after the ongoing yearly changeover.

Ford to pay $17.35 million over Escape recall

Thu, 01 Aug 2013

Ford had a bit of a recall spree around this time last year, with a pair of issues on the then-new 2013 Escape, followed by a recall of 423,000 2001 to 2004 Escapes because they might accelerate of their own accord. Accordingly, Uncle Sam pasted Ford with a $17.35 million fine because it took too long to inform customers, according to a report from Automotive News.
Ford agreed to settle with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, accepting the fine but not admitting fault. The recall, which afflicted Escapes with the 3.0-liter V-6 along with 217,000 Mazda Tributes from 2001 to 2006 and 2008, was due to faulty gas pedals that could stay down after a driver removed their foot.
Ford issued a statement regarding the fine, saying, "We take the safety of our customers seriously and continuously evaluate our processes for improvements. While we are confident in our current processes for quickly identifying and addressing potential vehicle issues, Ford agreed to this settlement to avoid a lengthy dispute with the government."