Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2006 Ford Freestar Se Mini Passenger Van 4-door 3.9l on 2040-cars

US $5,200.00
Year:2006 Mileage:89300
Location:

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Advertising:

2006 Ford Freestar SE Mini Van

FWD 3.9L V6, Automatic Transmission

193 HP, 16/22 MPG, Brand New PA Badges

89,300 Miles, 7 Passenger

Power Windows, Power Locks, Power Mirrors, 

Cruise Control, CD Stereo, Roof Rack, ABS,

Keyless entry with Security System, Tire Pressure Monitor,

Stow Away 3rd Row Seating.

This vehicle is being sold AS-IS and has no warranty. It is being advertised elsewhere and could be taken down any time. A $500 non refundable deposit is due within 24 hours of auction end. Buyer pays for all shipping/delivery costs. Thank you for looking and let me know if there are any other vehicles you are looking for!

Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Walburn Auto Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1261 Scott St, Hegins
Phone: (570) 797-1577

Vans Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 990 Bears Den Rd, Wheatland
Phone: (330) 799-2771

United Automotive Service Center LLC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheel Alignment-Frame & Axle Servicing-Automotive
Address: 1135 Wayne Ave, Shady-Grove
Phone: (717) 977-3052

Tomsic Motor Co ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 150 Racetrack Rd, Claysville
Phone: (724) 228-1330

Team One Auto Group ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 440 Loucks Rd, Dover
Phone: (717) 846-8326

Suburban Collision Specs Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 210 N Chester Pike, Chester
Phone: (610) 461-2700

Auto blog

Toyota, Ford not interested in FCA merger

Mon, Jun 15 2015

Sergio Marchionne will preach the benefits of mergers to anyone who'll listen, but his calls for industry consolidation may be falling on deaf ears. At least, that is, the ears of those who the Fiat Chrysler chief would most like to bend. Not only is General Motors uninterested, but according to The Detroit News, neither are Toyota or Ford. "It's something we would not be interested in," said Toyota's North American chief Jim Lentz, at the groundbreaking ceremony for the new Toyota Technical Center. "At 10 million (vehicles) we have enough scale right now to do what we need to do. There really would be no advantage for us." Toyota isn't the only one unenthused by the prospect of merging with Fiat Chrysler Automobiles. The Detroit News also reports that Ford, though it may yet to have been approached by Marchionne, wouldn't be interested either. "We're not a suitor for FCA," said Ford CFO Bob Shanks. "We don't see that type of opportunity as one that applies to us." With GM, Toyota, and Ford expressing disinterest in Marchionne's merger idea, the FCA chief will likely start looking elsewhere – or look for other ways to compel his primary candidate to reconsider. He may eventually find a partner – more likely in the Far East or within Europe – but it may not take the form of the major player Sergio has hoped for. News Source: The Detroit NewsImage Credit: Bill Pugliano/Getty Chrysler Fiat Ford Toyota Sergio Marchionne FCA merger fiat chrysler automobiles

Consumer Reports explains its disdain for infotainment

Thu, 20 Mar 2014

One of the perks of reviewing all manner of cars and trucks is that we're exposed to all the different infotainment systems. Whether Cadillac's CUE, Chrysler's UConnect, BMW's iDrive or MyFord Touch, we sample each and every infotainment system on the market.
Not surprisingly, some are better than others. It seems consumers have come to a similar consensus, with Consumer Reports claiming that Ford and Lincoln, Cadillac and Honda offer the worst user infotainment experiences. Not surprisingly, you won't find much argument among the Autoblog staff.
Take a look below to see just what it is about the latest batch of infotainment systems that grinds CR's gears. After that, scroll down into Comments and let us know if you agree with the mag's views.

Ram 1500 bests new F-150 in MT pickup shootout

Tue, Nov 25 2014

Ford's 2015 Ford F-150 is a technological tour-de-force, what with its aluminum-intensive construction and its powerful and efficient new 2.7-liter EcoBoost engine option. But now that it's hit the market, it's time to get down to brass tacks and find out how just the latest F-150 actually stands up to its rivals in the hyper-competitive fullsize segment. Motor Trend is among the first to round up the Ford (in Lariat 2.7-liter 4X4 guise here) and put it up against the Ram 1500 Outdoorsman EcoDiesel 4x4 and 5.3-liter-equipped Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71 to find out how Dearborn's new-think truck measures up. The test put the trio through over 1,000 miles of tough driving in California and Arizona in a variety of conditions from just cruising around unladen to hauling a trailer. MT found all three trucks to be competent, but the most praise got heaped on the Ram and the Ford, with the Chevrolet falling a step behind its competitors in many tests. Among the Ford's most-liked features was its 2.7-liter, twin-turbo V6 that helped make the F-150 easily the quickest of the group, with some editors saying the engine felt about the same whether driving around with cargo in the bed or not. There was some minor turbo lag during acceleration while trailering, but that issue affected the Ram, too. The Ram's powertrain was lauded, as well. The EcoDiesel was torquey around town, and the 1500's combination of an eight-speed automatic and air suspension was judged to be the best of the lot. It was the most difficult to get into the bed, though. The Ram also won the fuel economy award by netting 20-miles-per-gallon city and 28-mpg highway in the test to beat its Environmental Protection Agency ratings of 19/27. The Ford's EcoBoost managed 17/22, one mpg off each from the EPA numbers, and using a lot of throttle really depleted its efficiency. As MT notes, however, it would take time for the diesel's mileage savings to pay off at the pump for these two trucks. In the end, the Ram just barely eked out the win, with the title partially earned because of "the Ford's unknown maintenance and aluminum repair costs," according to MT. Go check out the full comparison to read all of the details, then let us know what you think in Comments.