Zx4 S 2.0lt Engine Automatic 79 K Miles Zero Accidents Locally Owned Trade In on 2040-cars
Alcoa, Tennessee, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:2.0L 121Cu. In. l4 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Dealer
Body Type:Sedan
Fuel Type:GAS
Make: Ford
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Model: Focus
Trim: ZX4 Sedan 4-Door
Options: CD Player
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4
Mileage: 79,425
Sub Model: ZX4 S
Number of Cylinders: 4
Exterior Color: Silver
Interior Color: Other
Ford Focus for Sale
- 2013 new titanium navigation sunroof leather automated parking sat radio sync(US $22,865.00)
- S new manual 2.0l cd 2.0l gdi i4 flex fuel engine (std) oxford white mp3 player(US $14,353.00)
- Sel 2.0l cd front wheel drive power steering 4-wheel disc brakes aluminum wheels
- 2006 ford focus zxw wagon 5-door 2.0l(US $6,000.00)
- 2007 ford focus st 4 door sedan with spoiler(US $2,500.00)
- 2000 ford focus sony limited edition wagon 4-door 2.0l good condition(US $3,499.95)
Auto Services in Tennessee
Wurster`s Foreign Car Repair ★★★★★
Wheel Tek ★★★★★
Wheel Tek ★★★★★
Wheel 1 ★★★★★
West End Tire Sales Inc ★★★★★
Tullahoma Tire & Brake Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Next Lincoln Navigator to drop V8 in favor of V6, but Ford Expedition might get both
Tue, 12 Mar 2013A great many buyers fled from full-size body-on-frame SUVs to car-based crossovers in large measure to save fuel. But that doesn't mean there's still not a buying audience for more traditional truck-based utility vehicles, and those consumers doubtlessly wouldn't mind saving some dollars at the pump, too. According to Motor Trend, those shoppers might be in luck.
That's because the magazine has confirmed that Ford isn't walking away from the full-size SUV segment, and it's poised to do something about its offerings' economy ratings, too. According to MT, global Lincoln director Matt VanDyke has hinted that the next Navigator may drop two cylinders and go with a V6 model - the current model gets just 14 miles per gallon in the city and 20 on the highway from its 5.4-liter V8. The obvious fitment would be Ford's 3.5-liter twin-turbo EcoBoost V6, an engine that has spread like kudzu throughout the rest of the Blue Oval's large vehicle lineup.
Downsized turbocharged engines like Ford's EcoBoost franchise have come under fire as of late for not delivering their EPA fuel economy ratings, but their benefits extend beyond consumption - the 3.5L offers superior power and a better torque curve than the naturally aspirated V8. MT also suggests that Ford's 3.7-liter V6 could form the base engine for the next Navi - it has similar horsepower but a lot less torque than the current 5.4L. That may be less of a problem with the next generation tipped to go on a diet, which could level the playing field somewhat.
Why Ford's Alan Mulally would be right for Microsoft, or any company
Thu, 03 Oct 2013
That Mulally was seriously being considered says a great deal about Microsoft and Mulally.
It appears that the chatter about Ford CEO Alan Mulally possibly leaving early to take over as CEO of Microsoft is losing air pretty fast. What's pretty interesting is that it got any traction in the first place.
1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express in Generation Gap showdown with 1933 Ford Pickup
Fri, 18 Jul 2014Auto enthusiasts love a good debate, whether it's Mustang versus Camaro or Ferrari against Lamborghini. But how about a battle between two very different vintages of classic pickup trucks? In this case, the fight is between a 1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express and a 1933 Ford Model 46 truck with a flathead V8.
The shootout comes courtesy of the internet series Generation Gap, and its concept is super-simple. One guy prefers classics, and the other likes newer rides. They choose a category, pick two vehicles and put them head to head. In this case, neither is exactly modern, though. The Ford is more than old enough to receive Social Security checks, and the Dodge is hardly a young whippersnapper.
Other than both being pickups, these two models were made to serve very different functions. The Li'l Red Express was basically the progenitor of today's muscle trucks, with a big V8 that made it one of the quickest new models in its day (admittedly, 1979 was a rough time for automotive performance). On the other hand, the '33 Ford was just meant to work, with little pretense for anything else. One of the hosts describes it as "the simplest, most difficult" vehicle he's driven because of the tricky double clutchwork necessary to shift gears. Scroll down to watch the video and try to decide which of these two American classics you would rather have in your garage.