Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2013 Ford Focus Se on 2040-cars

US $21,285.00
Year:2013 Mileage:29719 Color: Red
Location:

706 E Us Highway 74, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States

706 E Us Highway 74, Rockingham, North Carolina, United States
2013 Ford Focus SE, US $21,285.00, image 1
Advertising:
Fuel Type:E-85/Gasoline
Engine:2.0L I4 16V GDI DOHC Flexible Fuel
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic with Auto-Shift
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FADP3K28DL136125
Stock Num: 9555B
Make: Ford
Model: Focus SE
Year: 2013
Exterior Color: Red
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • AM/FM/Satellite-prep Radio
  • Audio controls on steering wheel
  • Audio system memory card slot
  • Braking Assist
  • Bucket front seats
  • Cargo area light
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Cloth seat upholstery
  • Coil front spring
  • Coil rear spring
  • Compass
  • Cruise control
  • Cruise controls on steering wheel
  • Digital Audio Input
  • Driver knee airbags
  • Dual illuminated vanity mirrors
  • Dusk sensing headlights
  • Electric power steering
  • External temperature display
  • Flip forward cushion/seatback rear seats
  • Four-wheel Independent Suspension
  • Front and rear suspension stabilizer bars
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 12.4 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 26 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 36 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Headlights off auto delay
  • In-Dash single CD player
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Independent rear suspension
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Interior air filtration
  • Manual front air conditioning
  • Manufacturer's 0-60mph acceleration time (seconds): 7.7 s
  • Max cargo capacity: 45 cu.ft.
  • MP3 player
  • Painted aluminum rims
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Radio Data System
  • Rear bench
  • Rear seats center armrest
  • Rear spoiler: Lip
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote activated exterior entry lights
  • Remote power door locks
  • Short and long arm rear suspension
  • Side airbag
  • Speed Sensitive Audio Volume Control
  • Stability control
  • Steel spar
  • Strut front suspension
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt and telescopic steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Total Number of Speakers: 6
  • Trip computer
  • Urethane shift knob trim
  • Urethane steering wheel trim
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: ULEV II
  • Video Monitor Location: Front
  • Wheel Diameter: 16
  • Wheel Width: 6
  • Wireless phone connectivity
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 29719

CHAMPION FORD LINCOLN, RIGHT DOWN THE ROAD FROM HIGHER PRICES!!!!!!!!

Auto Services in North Carolina

Winr Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: Manson
Phone: (919) 519-2996

Universal Motors ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 4128 Hickory Blvd, Rutherford-College
Phone: (828) 396-0103

Universal Automotive 4 x 4 & Drive Shaft Shop, Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 2199 Kannapolis Hwy, Concord
Phone: (704) 721-3319

Turner Towing & Recovery ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Automotive Roadside Service
Address: Wake-Forest
Phone: (919) 219-9096

Triad Sun Control Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Glass Coating & Tinting, Window Tinting
Address: 100 Griffith Plaza Dr, Wallburg
Phone: (336) 765-3622

Tom`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 141 Randy Ct, New-Hill
Phone: (919) 552-1146

Auto blog

PickupTrucks.com's latest test results in a familiar winner [w/video]

Wed, 19 Jun 2013

PickupTrucks.com has gone and thrown the latest batch of half-ton pickups into a cage match to see who would come out on top. The site put the 2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500, GMC Sierra 1500, 2013 Ford F-150, Ram 1500, Toyota Tundra and Nissan Titan through a battery of tests. Those included 0-60 miles per hour acceleration, 60-0 mph deceleration, fuel economy, a hill climb, and payload and towing. They even threw the rigs on an autocross course to evaluate overall handling. Each truck was given points based on how it scored in each evaluation.
Who came out on top? Somewhat surprisingly, the 2013 Ford F-150 walked away with the gold, though fewer than 50 points separated first and fourth place. Head over to PickupTrucks.com to read the full evaluation and the final results. You may be shocked to see exactly where some of the segment's newest additions placed. You can also watch a video on the test below.

Automakers want to stop the EPA's fuel economy rules change, and why that's a shortsighted move

Tue, Dec 6 2016

With a Trump Administration looming, the EPA moved quickly after the election to propose finalizing future fuel economy rules last week. The auto industry doesn't like that (surprise), and has started making moves to stop the EPA. Ford CEO Mark Fields said he wanted to lobby Trump to lower the standards, and now the Auto Alliance, a manufacturer group, is saying it will join the fight against cleaner cars. The Alliance represents 12 automakers: BMW, Fiat Chrysler, Ford, GM, Jaguar Land Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Porsche, Toyota, VW, and Volvo. Gloria Bergquist, a spokesperson for the Alliance, told Automotive News that the "EPA's sudden and controversial move to propose auto regulations eight months early - even after Congress warned agencies about taking such steps while political appointees were packing their bags - calls out for congressional action to pause this rulemaking until a thoughtful policy review can occur." The EPA was going to consider public comments through April 2017, but then said it would move the deadline to the end of December. That means that it can finalize the rules before President Obama leaves office. The director of public affairs for the Consumer Federation of America, Jack Gillis, said on a conference call with reporters last week when the EPA originally announced its decision that it is unlikely that President Trump will be able to roll back these changes. Gillis also said on the same call that any attempt by the automakers to prevent these changes would be history repeating itself. "These are the same companies that fought airbags, and now promoting the fact that every car has multiple airbags," he said. "These are the same companies that fought the crash-test program, and now are promoting the crash-test ratings published by the government. So, it's clear that they're misperceiving the needs of the American consumer." There are more reasons the Allliance's pushback is flawed. Carol Lee Rawn, the transportation program director for Ceres, said on that call that the automotive industry is a global one, and many automakers are moving to global platforms to help them meet strict fuel economy rules around the world.

MotorWeek remembers pre-EcoBoost Ford with the Thunderbird TurboCoupe

Thu, Feb 26 2015

Sometimes it feels great to embrace nostalgia for a trip down memory lane, and MotorWeek indulges that occasional desire with its regular Retro Review series. This time, the long-lived show goes back to the '80s to check out two of the top performance vehicles in the Ford lineup at the time – the 1987 Thunderbird TurboCoupe and Mustang GT. Both models had just received thorough refreshes after several years on the market. Long before an EcoBoost badge ever met its models, Ford made early forays into experimenting with turbocharging on vehicles like the T-Bird TurboCoupe. Based on MotorWeek's assessment, the company was on the right track. The boosted 2.3-liter four-cylinder was apparently a bit coarse but offered 190 horsepower with little turbo lag, compared to 155 hp the year before. The Mustang GT is likely the more-fondly remembered of these performance Fords today and provides an interesting point of comparison against the TurboCoupe. MotorWeek found some faults with the 'Stang, though. While it was quick for the time with a sprint to 60 mph in 6.5 seconds, the 'car was described as "a nose-heavy beast" for its handling. And for a look at Ford's future in turbocharging – the GT will have an EcoBoost powerplant – check out our Related Video: