Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1964 Falcon Two Door Hardtop With 302 Engine , Automatic Trans, Primer Paint on 2040-cars

US $6,200.00
Year:1964 Mileage:88231
Location:

Crumpler, North Carolina, United States

Crumpler, North Carolina, United States

up for bid is a very solid 1964 falcon future with a few modifactions it has a 302 engine with a mild cam.automatic trans. with shift kit  hurst promatic shifter flow master mufflers air shocks and traction bars .edelbrock carb and intake'  have a new headliner for it still in box. seats and door panels are decent for a driver but would need work for show.            has .good solid undercarriage tires has good tread but has some dry cracks the car was originally 260 4 speed car still has clutch linkage.     oredt@yahoo.com 336-877-7410 thanks

Auto Services in North Carolina

Wright`s Transmission ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission
Address: 601 Julian Ave, High-Point
Phone: (336) 472-0755

Wilburn Auto Body Shop Belmont ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 515 Park St, High-Shoals
Phone: (704) 825-0333

Whitaker`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 1472 Hasty School Rd, Welcome
Phone: (336) 431-0550

Trull`s Body & Paint Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing
Address: 1218 Rotherwood Rd, Pleasant-Garden
Phone: (336) 274-9390

Tint Wizard ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Glass Coating & Tinting
Address: 1131 Western Blvd, Jacksonville
Phone: (910) 353-8468

Texaco Xpress Lube ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 1203 N Brightleaf Blvd, Selma
Phone: (919) 938-2700

Auto blog

Autoblog Podcast #390

Tue, Jul 22 2014

Episode #390 of the Autoblog Podcast is here, and this week, Dan Roth, Steven Ewing and Sebastian Blanco from Autoblog Green talk about the 2015 Ford Mustang specs, the 2016 Smart models, a proposal to add real-world numbers to EPA economy tests and the potential downside of autonomous cars. We start with what's in the garage and finish up with some of your questions, and for those of you who hung with us live on our UStream channel, thanks for taking the time. Check out the new rundown below with times for topics, and you can follow along down below with our Q&A. Thanks for listening! Autoblog Podcast #390: The video meant to be presented here is no longer available. Sorry for the inconvenience. Topics: 2015 Ford Mustang specs 2016 Smart FourTwo and FourFour EPA wants road tests The downside of autonomous cars In the Autoblog Garage: 2014 Nissan Leaf 2015 Audi A3 Sportback E-Tron 2014 Scion tC Hosts: Dan Roth, Steven Ewing, Sebastian Blanco Runtime: 01:33:35 Rundown: Intro and Garage - 00:00 Mustang Specs - 34:40 2016 Smart Models - 51:14 EPA Tests - 01:02:57 Autonomous Cars - 01:11:19 Q&A - 01:21:22 Get the podcast: [UStream] Listen live on Mondays at 10 PM Eastern at UStream [iTunes] Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes [RSS] Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator [MP3] Download the MP3 directly Feedback: Email: Podcast at Autoblog dot com Review the show in iTunes Podcasts Audi Ford Nissan Scion smart Electric Hybrid

Ford C-Max, Fusion hybrids subject of MPG lawsuit in California

Fri, 01 Mar 2013

A California lawsuit over the fuel economy claims for the 2013 Ford C-Max was first reported back in December. Based on the numerous reports we've heard of disgruntled owners failing to get their car's EPA fuel economy ratings on the C-Max and 2013 Fusion Hybrid, we suspected there would be more to this story. The Detroit News is reporting that two California law firms are combining their lawsuits against Ford on this matter for "false and misleading" claims.
The article states that there are hundreds of C-Max and Fusion Hybrid owners who have joined the lawsuit, but the issue isn't limited to customers. In December, Consumer Reports extensively tested both the Fusion Hybrid and C-Max and found that both hybrids performed significantly worse than their EPA claims. This all comes just a few months after Hyundai and Kia took the unprecedented step of lowering the fuel economy ratings for all of their 2012 and 2013 model-year vehicles.

Trump did talk to Bill Ford, but the Kentucky plant was never moving to Mexico

Fri, Nov 18 2016

President-elect Donald J. Trump has been butting heads with Ford for a while now. A lot of it seems to stem from misunderstanding or misrepresenting facts about how the automaker currently does business and its plans for the future. After a sit-down with executive chairman Bill Ford Jr., the misunderstandings continue, but Trump has apparently convinced the company to make some changes. During his campaign, Trump claimed that Ford was going to fire US workers and move manufacturing to Mexico. That wasn't the case – yes, Ford planned to transfer Focus and C-Max production from Wayne, Michigan, to Cuautitlan, Mexico, but no, that wouldn't mean anyone losing their job. The Wayne plant will continue to operate, and likely busier than before, as it will be the home of the new Bronco and Ranger. So Ford CEO Mark Fields responded with the facts, and then chairman Bill Ford Jr. sat down with Trump over the summer. Things apparently weren't resolved to Trump's satisfaction, so he and Bill Ford spoke on the phone yesterday as he claims in this tweet: This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings. Let's pick that apart. First off, it's not a Lincoln plant, per se – the Louisville Assembly Plant currently builds the Ford Escape and Lincoln MKC, two small crossovers that share a platform. Ford was considering moving MKC production out of Kentucky to Mexico, but it would not have resulted in many lost jobs if any – the union had already agreed to moving the MKC in 2015 negotiations, and taking production of the slow-selling Lincoln out of the plant would open up capacity for more Fords. Be that as it may, Ford has decided not to move MKC production out of the plant, either for political reasons of placation or because it didn't make the greatest deal of business sense, maybe a combination of the two. That means Trump isn't really saving any American jobs in the short term. If anything, this move could keep Ford supply-constrained and result in reduced sales, which in turn brings the company less money and affects the bottom line and all employees. But that's speculation, so we won't tweet it. There is of course the possibility that Ford will be convinced, either by sheer will or by a more attractive trade situation, to invest in increased US production, which could bear fruit later on. We are told by Ford that the two men did in fact speak yesterday.