1964 Ford Fairlane 500 on 2040-cars
Hopewell, Virginia, United States
Body Type:Sedan
Engine:289 Special
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: Fairlane
Drive Type: Automatic
Mileage: 111,097
Exterior Color: White
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Red
Trim: Fairlane 500
|
1964 Ford Fairlane 500 four door sedan. This car was stored in a dairy barn since 1979. The gentleman that originally owned the vehicle replaced the original 260 V8 engine with a 289 Special that he had acquired from a wrecked low mileage 65-66 Mustang. The reason he changed the engine was because the original 260 threw its oil pump through the oil pan. The car has not run since 1979 and appears to be very solid. The floors and the trunk compartment are solid with no rust through. The front fenders have some minor rust holes coming in the lower sections. The inner fender at the battery box is rusted out, but all the shock towers are solid with not signs of visible rust. The left rear quarter panel was damaged in the late 1970s, and the owner attempted to beat the fender back out. There is no sign of rot in the rear quarters. The under carriage including all boxed framing appears to be solid and complete. There are some parts missing from the car and I have no idea what the gentleman did with the parts. The parts that are missing from what I can see is the master cylinder, power steering pump, headlight bezels, hubcaps, spare tire, jack, and the grille. Although there is a grille in the trunk which is in good condition, it appears the grille is from a 1963 Fairlane rather than the 64. There is an extra set of taillights in the trunk as well as a few other parts that goes with the vehicle. All of the glasses are in good shape, but the exhaust system has deteriorated. The car is not running and has not been started since 1979, so please be advised that this is not a vehicle that someone can drive away. It will require towing and time to get it back into running condition. I am including enough pictures to give an accurate depiction of the overall condition of the vehicle. Please take the time to study the pictures and ask questions prior to bidding. All questions will be answered honestly and as accurately as possible.
The vehicle is currently being sold as-is and where-is with no warranty implied or expressed. Make sure to ask any and all questions prior to bidding on this vehicle. A deposit of $200.00 dollars will be required within 3 days from the close of auction. The buyer is responsible for shipping and transport. The high bidder can make additional arrangements with seller if both agree. Full payment is required within 7 days of auction's close. Cash or Cashiers Check/Money Order. |
Ford Fairlane for Sale
1964 ford fairlane 500 2dr hardtop
1962 ford fairlane classic coupe 2 door hard top hot rat rod vintage muscle car
1959 fairlane skyliner-hide away hardtop, 332 c.i. engine, power steering, auto
1959 ford fairlane galaxie 500 sunliner convertible
1964 ford fairlane 500 4 door nice condition 260 cu in engine
1965 ford fairlane ultra rare k code 2 door tri-power hardtop~289/271(US $48,800.00)
Auto Services in Virginia
Wrenches on Wheels ★★★★★
Virginia Tire & Auto ★★★★★
Transmissions of Stafford ★★★★★
Shorty`s Automotive Inc ★★★★★
Shell Rapid Lube ★★★★★
Salem Car Shop Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Consumer Reports: Ford Fusion fun but flawed; Mitsubishi i-MiEV slow, chintzy [w/videos]
Wed, 23 Jan 2013Waiting for a Ford compliment from Consumer Reports these days is like waiting for a low-cost new product from Apple. So we weren't really expecting a glowing review of the 2013 Ford Fusion when CR got its hands on the car. The institute's crew bought three different versions of the Fusion (Hybrid, 1.6-liter EcoBoost and a Titanium with the 2.0-liter EcoBoost) to put through its barrage of tests, and while we aren't too surprised by some of the findings, they're still interesting nonetheless.
CR praises the Fusion for its "eye-catching" design and says that the sportier Titanium trim level is the best-handling midsize sedan they've ever tested, but that's about where the good news ends for Ford. The Fusion Hybrid also posted the best-ever fuel economy CR has recorded in a midsize sedan, but the only problem is that their number was 39 miles per gallon combined - far less than Ford's 47 mpg rating for city, highway and combined. As expected, CR also dinged the Fusion for its MyFord Touch, but some of the other gripes about the car include a cramped cabin and poor fit and finish.
Other Ford products tested this time around include the Focus Electric and C-Max Hybrid. Like the Fusion, CR's observed fuel economy of 37 mpg for the C-Max fell well short of Ford's advertised 47-mpg rating, and both cars were criticized for the use of MyFord Touch. CR notes that the Focus Electric's interior is also cramped, with the battery pack taking up a lot of cargo space.
2015 Shelby GT350 Mustang sounds racy as it revs [UPDATE]
Thu, May 21 2015UPDATE: It seems as though the GT350 exhaust was just too hot for YouTube. The video has been removed, as you can see. We'll keep combing the Interwebs for a new version. If you're somehow still on the fence about the 2015 Ford Shelby GT350 Mustang, then this video should provide some healthy encouragement about the new coupe. There's no high-speed action here, but you get to experience the wonderful sound of the GT350's 5.2-liter V8 with a flat-plane crankshaft start up, idle and throw some revs. At a twist of the key, the engine barks to attention, and a wonderfully crisp shriek comes from the exhaust when the driver blips the throttle. The GT350 even has a growly baritone at idle. According to the YouTube description, this car was on hand at the Carroll Shelby Tribute and Car Show in Gardena, CA. Unfortunately, videos online might be the best chance for many people to hear the wail of the latest GT350 for now. Ford is only building a total of 137 of them for the 2015 model year, but the numbers should pick up when the 2016 model year begins in just a few months.
Ford F-150 extended cab struggles in IIHS small overlap test
Thu, Jul 30 2015Update: Ford issued a statement to Autoblog to clarify the results of the test and dispute the IIHS repair cost estimates. A quote from a Ford representative has been added to the story. See the full statement below the IIHS press release. Of all the vehicles undergoing crash tests this year, few will be as closely watched as the new 2015 Ford F-150. That's not only because it remains the top-selling vehicle in America year after year, but also because it features an aluminum body instead of steel. While the F-150 performed well in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety test, one factor prompted the institute to undertake a second round of testing that uncovered a problem. Like most full-size pickups, the F-150 is available in several cab styles: the regular two-door, the extended SuperCab and the four-door SuperCrew. The IIHS typically takes the most popular version of a particular model for testing, and in the Ford truck's case that meant the SuperCrew. The F-150 performed well in all the tests the IIHS put it through, including the small overlap test in which the vehicle is driven 40 miles per hour into a five-foot-tall barrier impacting the front left corner of the vehicle. Its overall performance in the tests earned the F-150 a Top Safety Pick rating, missing out on the higher Top Safety Pick + rating only because it doesn't have an automatic braking system. But how do the other versions of Ford's best-seller hold up? Given that even less popular versions of the F-150 still sell more than many other vehicles on the market, the IIHS put an extended cab through the same battery of tests. It performed comparably except in one area: the small overlap test. In that case, the extended cab model's steering column was pushed eight inches into the cabin (dangerously close to the crash test dummy's chest), the dummy's head missed the airbag almost entirely and hit the instrument panel, and the dummy's legs would risk sustaining "moderate" injuries. The reason for the disparity is that "Ford added structural elements to the crew cab's front frame to earn a good small overlap rating and a Top Safety Pick award but didn't do the same for the extended cab," according to the Institute's chief research officer David Zuby. "That shortchanges buyers who might pick the extended cab thinking it offers the same protection in this type of crash as the crew cab.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.059 s, 7974 u























