1958 Ford Fairlane 500 4 Door Good Restorable Condition Under 80000 Original Ml on 2040-cars
Lewiston, Idaho, United States
Well, here's where I tell you what's wrong and what's right. It needs a little of this and that. but, it's fairly complete (all the parts are there except for a few tiny pieces) The chromes all there but, some isn't perfect. (see pics) The VIN number says it's a 332 but, when parts were gotten for it, they were the wrong ones so, the 352 parts fit. Must be a 352. The exterior has some surface rust in spots and the rear fenders need repair. The rest of the car has only a little surface rust on it in places. Needs paint terrible bad. The interior is all original, coming unstitched with age. It does run really well. The only thing keeping it off the road is a leaky power steering hose and the slave cylinder needs rebuilt. Now, here's what right. Never been wrecked, all the electric stuff ( power windows, 6 way power seat, radio, etc, ) all work. Got some spare parts for it that I'll throw in the trunk. Runs pretty sound. Third owner. was bought in 1958 by a doctor in my small town, then, grandmother bought it from them. then, I became owner. AT THE END OF THE AUCTION, A DEPOSIT OF 500.00 IS NEEDED TO HOLD THE CAR. THIS DEPOSIT IS NON REFUNDABLE. (keeps the tire kickers away) AND THE BALANCE ON PICKUP OF THE CAR.! NO. CHECKS ! BUYER ARRANGES SHIPPING !!
|
Ford Fairlane for Sale
Auto Services in Idaho
Nampa Auto Repair & Towing ★★★★★
Mountain Home Car Care Center ★★★★★
Major Tire & Hitch Inc ★★★★★
Lund Service ★★★★★
John`s Powertune, Inc. ★★★★★
Custom Car Design Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Suppliers love Toyota and Honda: Why that matters to you
Mon, May 15 2017You might think that a survey of automotive suppliers and their relationship with OEMs is the automotive equivalent of nerd prom. In some ways that's what the North American Automotive OEM-Supplier Working Relations Index (WRI) is. The study, the 17th annual conducted by Planning Perspectives Inc., is based on input from 652 salespeople from 108 Tier One suppliers, or, PPI points out, 40 of the top 50 automotive suppliers in North America. Suppliers to General Motors, Ford, FCA, Toyota, Honda, and Nissan. But the results have consequences in terms of tens of millions of dollars for OEMs - and in the quality, technology, and cost of the next vehicle you buy. There are a couple of ways to look at the results of the WRI. One is, "So what else is new?" And the other is, "Damn! How did that happen?" The study looks at five relationship areas — OEM Supplier Relationship; OEM Communication; OEM Help; OEM Hindrance; Supplier Profit Opportunity — within six purchasing areas — Body-in-White; Chassis; Electrical/Electronics; Exterior; Interior; Powertrain. In the overall rankings, Toyota is on top for the 15 th time in 17 years, with a score of 328. Honda, the only company to best Toyota (in 2009 and 2010), comes in second, at 319. Those two companies, explains John Henke, president of PPI, have collaborative working arrangements with colleagues and suppliers alike built into the very fabric of their cultures. This, however, is not a situation where one can readily conclude it is about "Japanese companies," because the third company with headquarters on the island of Honshu, Nissan, came in dead last. This is the "How did that happen?" portion. The Nissan score of 203 puts it 125 points behind Toyota. There hasn't been a number that low since the then-Chrysler Corp. scored 187 in 2010, when the company was clawing its way out of the recession. Clearly, the suppliers don't feel particularly engaged by the buyers at Nissan. Henke explains that whether a company does well or not on the WRI is rather simple. All people do things based on what they're measured on. "If you're measured on taking 10% out of your annual buy, you immediately know how to do it. But if you're also measured on improving relations, suddenly there is a new dynamic as to what you can do to achieve both.
Motor Trend pits Camaro 1LE vs Mustang with Performance Pack, surprises ensue
Thu, 16 Oct 2014With the 2015 Ford Mustang firmly on the scene, the inevitable comparisons with its arch rival, the 2015 Chevrolet Camaro are just starting to trickle out. Over the next several months, you're likely to be inundated by every outlet's muscle car comparison, whether it be the turbocharged Ford against the V6 Chevy, a V8-powered convertible comparo or what we have here, a competition between each vehicle's performance upgrade.
Motor Trend has pitted the Camaro SS 1LE against a Mustang with the GT Performance Pack for a comprehensive series of comparisons on the test stage, street and finally, at Willow Springs with ace Randy Pobst behind the wheel. As per usual, we aren't about to spoil this one for you.
So, hit the play button, have a look and then let us know what you think in Comments.
2013 Ford Mustang V6
Mon, 10 Jun 2013Secretary Trim, Evolved
There was a time not so long ago when opting for a base Ford Mustang meant getting little more than some sheetmetal, an anemic four-cylinder engine and what may very well have been the world's most disappointing automatic transmission. During the Fox Body years, Ford seemed hell-bent on living up to Carroll Shelby's derogatory description of the coupe as little more than a runabout for demure office assistants, and the result was a base model with fewer sporting intentions than a Dilbert day calendar.
Some 20 years later, hopping behind the wheel of an entry-level pony is an entirely different experience. With all of the menacing aesthetics of the brawnier GT, a well-equipped interior and a drivetrain that toes the line between efficiency and power better than few before it, the 2013 Ford Mustang V6 is an attractive option for buyers in the big coupe market. But is it attractive enough to forgo the beastly GT?