2001 Ford F450 Crew Cab 7.3 Diesel Low Miles Runs Perfect 0 Rust Dump Bed on 2040-cars
Wells, Minnesota, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:7.3L V8 Diesel turbocharged
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Private Seller
Make: Ford
Model: F-450
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Crew Cab
Trim: Crew Cab 4 Door Pickup with Dump Bed
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Drive Type: RWD
Power Options: Cruise Control
Mileage: 71,000
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Tan
Number of Doors: 4
Number of Cylinders: 8
2001 Ford F450
71,000 Miles
7.3 Diesel with Automatic Transmission
Truck was purchased from a dealership who obtained it at auction from the county of Orange California, No Rust, Solid Body!
Working Dump Body
Good rubber all around 75% or better
Brakes done within the last 5k
Everything functions as it should
New Starter
Driver and Passenger Airbags
Clean Title
Passes DOT
Bought this truck while I was in California because it was so rare and hard to find, I couldn't pass it up.
This truck runs perfectly and is strong as a bull! Ford's best diesel with Ford's best tranny = in my opinion, Ford's best truck.
I went through the expense of getting this truck for a few reasons, namely the low mileage. This truck was built to work with no "fluff". Manual windows, rubber floors and bench seats are what I wanted, but very hard to come by. The reason being is that it is a WORK truck, and designed to make money, but it seems everyone buys theirs for luxury. I knew I would have dirty boots, dirty hands, dirty everything, so I wanted a truck I could wipe down and have look like new again, and this is it!
I plug the truck in at nights when it is below 40 as I think Ford's glow plugs are unreliable. She starts up with no smoke and no issues. After looking around I think I have this truck priced very fairly as similar trucks are listed around 20k, and I am willing to negotiate for cash buyers.
This truck is like new minus a few minor issues in the paint, no rust, just some paint flaking. It has only been driven in winter twice.
You can spend $50-60k on a new Ford, and it won't be as reliable as this for less than $20k!
For More Information regarding this truck call or text (507)461-zero317 or please use the ebay message system.
Thanks for looking!
Ford F-450 for Sale
2011 ford f-450 lariat diesel drw fx4 4x4 sunroof 20k texas direct auto(US $49,980.00)
2013 drw platinum 4wd crew cab 6.7 v8 diesel! 4x4! navigation! msrp $72,100(US $63,749.00)
2008 ford f450 lariat diesel drw western hauler nav 43k texas direct auto(US $37,980.00)
08 f450 4wd dually lariat crew 6.4 diesel tv/dvd we finance!!(US $34,995.00)
2009 ford f-450 lariat diesel drw 4x4 sunroof nav 63k texas direct auto(US $37,980.00)
2006 ford f-550 crew diesel drw regency hauler bed dvd texas direct auto(US $31,780.00)
Auto Services in Minnesota
Walters Rebuilders ★★★★★
Vic`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★
Toms Mobile RV Service ★★★★★
Tom Kadlec Honda ★★★★★
Ryans Auto Salvage ★★★★★
Auto blog
The 1965 Ford Mustang could have looked a lot different
Fri, May 8 2020The 1965 Ford Mustang is unquestionably an automotive design icon, and nearly every generation of Mustang has some connection to that original car. Because it's such a universally-known vehicle, we were amazed to see all the different designs that were being considered. Head of Ford's archives Ted Ryan recently shared photos of design proposals for the original Mustang on Twitter that he and Jamie Myler found, and we reached out to them to find out more. As Ryan initially noted, the photos were taken on August 19, 1962, and they are proposals for the Ford Mustang. Apparently Ford had committed to doing a Falcon-based youth-oriented car at this point, and it did have plans to launch the car in 1964 for the 1965 model year. But after having little success with early design proposals, the company asked all of its design studios — the Advanced Studio, Lincoln-Mercury Studio and Ford Studio — to submit proposals. With only about two years before the planned launch, Ford was understandably short on time, and it's believed that the studios only had a month to create and present these designs. Lincoln-Mercury design proposal View 8 Photos The majority of the designs, a total of five, came from the Advanced Studio, and part of this was because they already had a couple of concept designs in reserve it could present. Two other models representing three design possibilities came from Lincoln-Mercury, and just one model with two options came from Ford. The Advanced Studio proposals are shown in the gallery at the very top of this article, and the Lincoln-Mercury and Ford proposals are in the gallery directly above this paragraph. The Advanced Studio's most radical design is the one that was clearly related to the Mustang I concept that would be shown later that year with huge wraparound rear glass, turbine-inspired bumpers and enormous side scoops. The other proposals from the studio were more conservative, featuring simple lines, grilles reminiscent of the Falcon, and one even borrowing the jet-thruster-style taillights made famous on the Thunderbird. Lincoln-Mercury had some impressively bold designs, particularly its fastback that had buttresses to extend the shape all the way to the tail. This car had two different side trim possibilities. The other Lincoln-Mercury design was toned down a bit, but had two interesting possibilities for side detailing, as well as some crisp, low-profile tail fins.
Buy Ford and GM stock and make 5%
Tue, Feb 2 2016Want to make a five-percent return when 10-year treasuries are paying around two percent? Ford (F) and General Motors (GM) have solid balance sheets, strong cash flow, solid earnings, and growing markets. By all accounts, they are smart investments. But the market is down on these stocks. Why? Some of the stupid excuses include: They are cyclical companies The Detroit 3 have lost 3.5 million in sales since 2000 The world economy is shaky GM recently filed for bankruptcy Their markets have peaked They haven't changed their ways Let's take these criticisms one by one: They Are Cyclical Companies Yes, they are cyclical. Every company is cyclical. Every industry is cyclical. Some more than others, but not every company is immune from swings in the market. Banks used to be 'non-cyclical' leader, not anymore. Airline stocks are just as cyclical as auto stocks, yet they are trading at multiples greater than the auto industry. Why? And what accounts for the irrational stock price for Tesla (TSLA)? At least Ford (F) and General Motors (GM) make money and have positive cash flows. In fact, both companies have a net positive cash position. They have more cash on hand than liabilities. Auto sales in the United States hit a record 17.5 million vehicles in 2015. During the Great Recession, Ford (F) and General Motors (GM) cut their break even points to 10 million vehicles per year. Anything above an annual U.S. volume of 10 million vehicles is profit. And what a profit they make. Sales of Ford's F-150 continues to be the best-selling vehicle in the United States for over 30 years. Detroit 3 Have Lost 3.5 million in Sales Since 2000 Automotive News reports General Motors (GM), Ford (F) and Chrysler (FCA) have lost a combined 3.5 million vehicles sales since 2000. So how can they be making more money? Two big reasons – Fleet Sales and the UAW. Fleet Sales The Detroit 3 used to own car rental companies to keep their factories running. Ford owned Hertz (HTZ), General Motors owned all of National Car Rental and 29 percent of Avis, and Chrysler, the forerunner to Fiat Chrysler (FCA), used to own Thrifty Car Rental and Dollar Rent-A-Car. The Detroit 3 owned these rental companies to have a place to sell their bad product and keep their factories running. These were low margin sales, and in many cases, were money losers for the Detroit 3. They no longer own auto rental companies.
Experts wonder if aluminum F-150 gives Ford a real advantage
Mon, 17 Mar 2014There's no doubt that Ford is taking a risk in producing the body of its upcoming new F-150 pickup truck in aluminum. What is up for debate, however, is whether aluminum was a wise risk to take in the first place. Wards Auto took the opportunity to poll some experts on the subject of aluminum versus steel in the automotive sector, with somewhat unsurprising results.
Richard Schultz, a project consultant at Ducker Worldwide, which bills itself as "a leading aluminum industry consultant (though they also deal in steels), suggests that the potential drawbacks to aluminum - higher costs, lower supply - aren't really impediments to the auto industry's increased acceptance of the lightweight metal.
Similarly, Randall Scheps, global automotive marketing director for Alcoa, a massive aluminum producer, counters claims that aluminum is less safe for vehicle occupants, suggesting that the use of aluminum can actually increase safety as it could potentially allow for larger vehicles with more crush space than steel.