Diesel 2010 "king Ranch" F-350 Truck Dually on 2040-cars
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:6.4L
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Private Seller
Make: Ford
Model: F-350
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Crew Cab 4-door
Trim: King Ranch Edition
Options: Navigation System, Dually, Back-up Camera w/ alarm, Blue Tooth, AM/FM Radio w/ Sirius, Set up for 5th wheel hitch, Line-X Bed Liner, 90 Gallon Auxillary Fuel Tank w/ Tool Box, Loaded w/ Sync System, Home link x3, Diesel, Towing Pkg, Wood Trim, Heated Seats, Leather Seats, CD Player
Drive Type: 2 WD
Safety Features: Exhaust Brakes, Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Mileage: 37,500
Power Options: A/C Dual, Power Folding Mirrors, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Sub Model: Diesel DUALLY
Exterior Color: White w/ Tan Trim
Interior Color: Burgundy Brown
Warranty: 5 year 60,000 mi power train
Number of Cylinders: 8
Ford F-350 for Sale
- 2011 ford f350 power stroke dually diesel v8 4wd with warranty!$$(US $42,500.00)
- 2000 ford f-350 dump truck(US $13,500.00)
- Ford f-350 sd crew cab xlt fx4 172" wheelbase utility body(US $12,500.00)
- Ford crew cab powerstroke diesel lariat 4x4 custom lift wheels tires leather
- 2005 f350 crew cab lariat diesel(US $20,000.00)
- 2008 ford f350 service truck utility 9 ft bed lift gate top open fleet serviced(US $10,450.00)
Auto Services in Louisiana
Winners Circle Car Care Center ★★★★★
Twin Tire ★★★★★
Top 10 Motorsports ★★★★★
Service Plus Auto Glass ★★★★★
Quintin`s Paint And Body Shop ★★★★★
Pupie`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Auto blog
NHTSA closes Ford F-150 EcoBoost acceleration probe
Mon, 14 Apr 2014Typically when we report on the findings of an investigation from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, it's because the government body has discovered a safety issue and prescribed a recall. In this case, however, NHTSA has closed an investigation into a reported performance deficit without ever getting to the recall stage.
The issue revolves around the Ford F-150 - specifically those equipped with the 3.5-liter EcoBoost engine - of which some 360,000 were built in the 2011, 2012 and 2013 model years. After receiving an initial 95 complaints, NHTSA opened an investigation last May - almost a year ago - into the reported issue of reduced engine power under hard acceleration. The agency has since received a total of 525 such complaints, and Ford itself reported receiving over 4,000.
Together, NHTSA and Ford determined that the problem resulted from cylinders misfiring, an issue itself stemming from water getting into the charge air cooler (CAC) mated to the turbochargers. In particularly humid or rainy conditions, water was found to get into the CAC, causing some of the cylinders to misfire, which in turn triggered the ECU to disable those cylinders in order to protect the catalytic converter from damage.
Ford books $2.6B pretax quarterly profit
Thu, 24 Jul 2014While its crosstown competitors at General Motors are smarting over a drastic drop in net income to $200 million in the second quarter, Ford has reason to celebrate. The Blue Oval has announced its own Q2 financial results, including a growing net income of $1.3 billion, a $78 million increase over last year. Pretax profits for the company reached $2.6 billion, up $44 million from 2013, but total revenue dropped slightly to $37.4 billion, down from $37.9 billion. Profits per share before one-time charges totaled 40 cents per share, beating Wall Street analysts' expectations of 36 cents a share.
Regionally, the Blue Oval performed strongly, as well. North America posted a record quarterly pre-tax profit of $2.4 billion, a $119 million increase. Europe also showed signs of turn around with its first profit in three years of $14 million after a loss of $306 million in Q2 2013. Ford is actually predicting profitability in the troubled region in 2015. Asia Pacific operations also performed well with $159 million in profits, up $29 million from last year. The only region where the business posted a loss was South America.
According to Automotive News, Ford also announced more precise plans about the changeover to build the aluminum-intensive 2015 F-150. In August, the Dearborn plant will shutdown for eight weeks to retool and its Kansas City plant will do the same next year.
Ford fights back against patent trolls
Fri, Feb 13 2015Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.