2015 Ford F350 on 2040-cars
12610 Ford Dr, Fishers, Indiana, United States
Engine:6.7L V8 32V DDI OHV Turbo Diesel
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FT8W3BT6FEA38628
Stock Num: NT1135
Make: Ford
Model: F350
Year: 2015
Exterior Color: White
Options: Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 13
Don Hinds Ford is Indiana's Premier Ford Dealer. We offer you the highest quality and lowest prices. Come see for yourself why Don Hinds Ford is "One Of A Kind". Stop by or give us a call at 888-238-8176 and ask for Rick McKenzie Ext.1420. Our sales department hours are Mon,Wed,Thur 8:30am to 8:00pm Tue,Fri,Sat 8:30am to 6:00pm.
Ford F-350 for Sale
- 2015 ford f350(US $52,460.00)
- 2015 ford f350(US $69,795.00)
- 2015 ford f350(US $42,688.00)
- 2014 ford f350(US $57,060.00)
- 2014 ford f350 xl(US $32,000.00)
- 2013 ford f350 xl(US $49,120.00)
Auto Services in Indiana
Williams Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★
Williams Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★
Webb Hyundai ★★★★★
Trusty & Sons Tire Co ★★★★★
Tom Roush Lincoln Mazda ★★★★★
Tire Barn Warehouse ★★★★★
Auto blog
PickupTrucks.com's latest test results in a familiar winner [w/video]
Wed, 19 Jun 2013PickupTrucks.com has gone and thrown the latest batch of half-ton pickups into a cage match to see who would come out on top. The site put the 2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500, GMC Sierra 1500, 2013 Ford F-150, Ram 1500, Toyota Tundra and Nissan Titan through a battery of tests. Those included 0-60 miles per hour acceleration, 60-0 mph deceleration, fuel economy, a hill climb, and payload and towing. They even threw the rigs on an autocross course to evaluate overall handling. Each truck was given points based on how it scored in each evaluation.
Who came out on top? Somewhat surprisingly, the 2013 Ford F-150 walked away with the gold, though fewer than 50 points separated first and fourth place. Head over to PickupTrucks.com to read the full evaluation and the final results. You may be shocked to see exactly where some of the segment's newest additions placed. You can also watch a video on the test below.
'84 MotorWeek Cherokee, Bronco and Blazer comparison indulges your SUV nostalgia
Fri, Jan 16 2015These days, truck-based, full-frame SUVs are somewhat of a rarity on the auto landscape due to the rapid rise in popularity of easier-driving, car-based crossovers. Although, without the gradually building popularity of these chunky, high-riding vehicles decades ago, it's unlikely that America's roads would be filled with so many CUVs today. In its latest dig into the archives, MotorWeek has found a 1984 comparison test of a trio of these early Sport Utility Wagons, as long-time host John Davis called them, that helped get acceptance of this segment going. This is a red, white and blue test of the SUVs from American automakers at the time and pits the Chevrolet Blazer, Ford Bronco and Jeep Cherokee (specifically in Wagoneer guise) against each other. Driving manners and interior usability are considered in the evaluation, but Motorweek actually takes these vehicles off road, too. Among the bigger revelations is the improvement in on-road ability in the past 30 years. While specific 0-60 times aren't given, all three models take around 10 seconds just to get to around 50 miles per hour in the 500-feet on-ramp acceleration test. Check out this clip to see just how far this segment has progressed in the past three decades or just get a blast of nostalgia from these now vintage models. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Ford Jeep SUV Off-Road Vehicles Classics Videos Ford Bronco chevy blazer
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.